ABSTRACT
Financial variables such as asset returns in the massive market contain various hierarchical and horizontal relationships forming complicated dependence structures. Modeling and mining of these structures is challenging due to their own high structural complexities as well as the stylized facts of the market data. This paper introduces a new canonical vine dependence model to identify the asymmetric and non-linear dependence structures of asset returns without any prior independence assumptions. To simplify the model while maintaining its merit, a partial correlation based method is proposed to optimize the canonical vine. Compared with the original canonical vine, the new model can still maintain the most important dependence but many unimportant nodes are removed to simplify the canonical vine structure. Our model is applied to construct and analyze dependence structures of European stocks as case studies. Its performance is evaluated by measuring portfolio of Value at Risk, a widely used risk management measure. In comparison to a very recent canonical vine model and the 'full' model, our experimental results demonstrate that our model has a much better quality of Value at Risk, providing insightful knowledge for investors to control and reduce the aggregation risk of the portfolio.
- K. Aas and D. Berg. Models for construction of multivariate dependence--a comparison study. The European Journal of Finance, 15(7--8):639--659, 2009.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. Alexander. Market Risk Analysis, Value at Risk Models, volume 4. Wiley, 200Google Scholar
- T. Andersen, R. Davis, and J. Kreis. Handbook of financial time series. Springer Verlag, 2009.Google Scholar
- L. Cao, Y. Ou, P. YU, and G. Wei. Detecting abnormal coupled sequences and sequence changes in group-based manipulative trading behaviors. In KDD2010, pages 85--94, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Chollete, A. Heinen, and A. Valdesogo. Modeling international financial returns with a multivariate regime-switching copula. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 7(4):437--480, 2009.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. Christoffersen. Evaluating interval forecasts. International economic review, pages 841--862, 1998.Google Scholar
- C. Erb, C. Harvey, and T. Viskanta. Forecasting international equity correlations. Financial Analysts Journal, pages 32--45, 1994.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. Guermat. Robust conditional variance estimation and value-at-risk. Journal of Risk, 2007:11--21, 2007.Google Scholar
- B. E. Hansen. Autoregressive conditional density estimation. International Economic Review, 35(3):705--730, 1994.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Heinen. Asymmetric capm dependence for large dimensions: the canonical vine autoregressive model. ECORE Discussion Papers, 2009.Google Scholar
- P. Kupiec. Techniques for verifying the accuracy of risk measurement models. The Journal of Derivatives, 3(02), 1995.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Kurowicka. Optimal truncation of vines. Dependence Modeling: Vine Copula Handbook, page 233, 2011.Google Scholar
- D. Kurowicka and R. Cooke. Uncertainty analysis with high dimensional dependence modelling. John Wiley & Sons Inc, 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Kurowicka, R. Cooke, and U. Callies. Vines inference. Brazilian Journal of Probability and Statistics, 20:103--120, 2006.Google Scholar
- A. McLeod and W. Li. Diagnostic checking arma time series models using squared-residual autocorrelations. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 4(4):269--273, 1983.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Min and C. Czado. Bayesian inference for multivariate copulas using pair-copula constructions. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 8(4):511--546, 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Patton. On the out-of-sample importance of skewness and asymmetric dependence for asset allocation. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 2(1):130--168, 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Sklar. Fonctions de répartition à n dimensions et leurs marges. Publ. Inst. Statist. Univ. Paris, 8(1), 1959.Google Scholar
- M. Smith, A. Min, C. Almeida, and C. Czado. Modeling longitudinal data using a pair-copula decomposition of serial dependence. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105(492):1467--1479, 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Model the complex dependence structures of financial variables by using canonical vine
Recommendations
Tail dependence functions and vine copulas
Tail dependence and conditional tail dependence functions describe, respectively, the tail probabilities and conditional tail probabilities of a copula at various relative scales. The properties as well as the interplay of these two functions are ...
Analyzing Contagion Effect in Markets During Financial Crisis Using Stochastic Autoregressive Canonical Vine Model
Using the multivariate dynamic framework, we study the contagion effect through the change in the dependence structure of major stock markets of the USA, China, Japan, Russia, Hong Kong and India, during the recent (2015) slowdown in China market, the ...
Vine-copula GARCH model with dynamic conditional dependence
Constructing multivariate conditional distributions for non-Gaussian return series has been a major research agenda recently. Copula GARCH models combine the use of GARCH models and a copula function to allow flexibility on the choice of marginal ...
Comments