skip to main content
10.1145/2396761.2398443acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Model the complex dependence structures of financial variables by using canonical vine

Authors Info & Claims
Published:29 October 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Financial variables such as asset returns in the massive market contain various hierarchical and horizontal relationships forming complicated dependence structures. Modeling and mining of these structures is challenging due to their own high structural complexities as well as the stylized facts of the market data. This paper introduces a new canonical vine dependence model to identify the asymmetric and non-linear dependence structures of asset returns without any prior independence assumptions. To simplify the model while maintaining its merit, a partial correlation based method is proposed to optimize the canonical vine. Compared with the original canonical vine, the new model can still maintain the most important dependence but many unimportant nodes are removed to simplify the canonical vine structure. Our model is applied to construct and analyze dependence structures of European stocks as case studies. Its performance is evaluated by measuring portfolio of Value at Risk, a widely used risk management measure. In comparison to a very recent canonical vine model and the 'full' model, our experimental results demonstrate that our model has a much better quality of Value at Risk, providing insightful knowledge for investors to control and reduce the aggregation risk of the portfolio.

References

  1. K. Aas and D. Berg. Models for construction of multivariate dependence--a comparison study. The European Journal of Finance, 15(7--8):639--659, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. C. Alexander. Market Risk Analysis, Value at Risk Models, volume 4. Wiley, 200Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. T. Andersen, R. Davis, and J. Kreis. Handbook of financial time series. Springer Verlag, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. L. Cao, Y. Ou, P. YU, and G. Wei. Detecting abnormal coupled sequences and sequence changes in group-based manipulative trading behaviors. In KDD2010, pages 85--94, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. L. Chollete, A. Heinen, and A. Valdesogo. Modeling international financial returns with a multivariate regime-switching copula. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 7(4):437--480, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. P. Christoffersen. Evaluating interval forecasts. International economic review, pages 841--862, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. C. Erb, C. Harvey, and T. Viskanta. Forecasting international equity correlations. Financial Analysts Journal, pages 32--45, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. C. Guermat. Robust conditional variance estimation and value-at-risk. Journal of Risk, 2007:11--21, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. B. E. Hansen. Autoregressive conditional density estimation. International Economic Review, 35(3):705--730, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. A. Heinen. Asymmetric capm dependence for large dimensions: the canonical vine autoregressive model. ECORE Discussion Papers, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. P. Kupiec. Techniques for verifying the accuracy of risk measurement models. The Journal of Derivatives, 3(02), 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. D. Kurowicka. Optimal truncation of vines. Dependence Modeling: Vine Copula Handbook, page 233, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. D. Kurowicka and R. Cooke. Uncertainty analysis with high dimensional dependence modelling. John Wiley & Sons Inc, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. D. Kurowicka, R. Cooke, and U. Callies. Vines inference. Brazilian Journal of Probability and Statistics, 20:103--120, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. A. McLeod and W. Li. Diagnostic checking arma time series models using squared-residual autocorrelations. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 4(4):269--273, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. A. Min and C. Czado. Bayesian inference for multivariate copulas using pair-copula constructions. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 8(4):511--546, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. A. Patton. On the out-of-sample importance of skewness and asymmetric dependence for asset allocation. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 2(1):130--168, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. A. Sklar. Fonctions de répartition à n dimensions et leurs marges. Publ. Inst. Statist. Univ. Paris, 8(1), 1959.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. M. Smith, A. Min, C. Almeida, and C. Czado. Modeling longitudinal data using a pair-copula decomposition of serial dependence. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105(492):1467--1479, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Model the complex dependence structures of financial variables by using canonical vine

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CIKM '12: Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management
      October 2012
      2840 pages
      ISBN:9781450311564
      DOI:10.1145/2396761

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 29 October 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader