skip to main content
10.1145/2396761.2398489acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Unsupervised discovery of opposing opinion networks from forum discussions

Published: 29 October 2012 Publication History

Abstract

With more and more people freely express opinions as well as actively interact with each other in discussion threads, online forums are becoming a gold mine with rich information about people's opinions and social behaviors. In this paper, we study an interesting new problem of automatically discovering opposing opinion networks of users from forum discussions, which are subset of users who are strongly against each other on some topic. Toward this goal, we propose to use signals from both textual content (e.g., who says what) and social interactions (e.g., who talks to whom) which are both abundant in online forums. We also design an optimization formulation to combine all the signals in an unsupervised way. We created a data set by manually annotating forum data on five controversial topics and our experimental results show that the proposed optimization method outperforms several baselines and existing approaches, demonstrating the power of combining both text analysis and social network analysis in analyzing and generating the opposing opinion networks.

References

[1]
R. Agrawal, S. Rajagopalan, R. Srikant, and Y. Xu. Mining newsgroups using networks arising from social behavior. In WWW '03, pages 529--535. ACM.
[2]
M. Bansal, C. Cardie, and L. Lee. The power of negative thinking: Exploiting label disagreement in the min-cut classification framework. COLING'08: Companion volume: Posters, pages 13--16.
[3]
C. Burfoot, S. Bird, and T. Baldwin. Collective classification of congressional floor-debate transcripts. In ACL'11: Human Language Technologies, pages 1506--1515.
[4]
H. Cui, V. Mittal, and M. Datar. Comparative experiments on sentiment classification for online product reviews. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, page 1265, 2006.
[5]
K. Dave, S. Lawrence, and D. Pennock. Mining the peanut gallery: opinion extraction and semantic classification of product reviews. In WWW'03, pages 519--528. ACM.
[6]
M. Galley, K. McKeown, J. Hirschberg, and E. Shriberg. Identifying agreement and disagreement in conversational speech: use of bayesian networks to model pragmatic dependencies. In ACL '04.
[7]
A. Goldberg and X. Zhu. Seeing stars when there aren't many stars: graph-based semi-supervised learning for sentiment categorization. In TextGraphs-1, pages 45--52. ACL, 2006.
[8]
T. Hofmann. Probabilistic latent semantic indexing. In SIGIR'99.
[9]
S. Kim and E. Hovy. Determining the sentiment of opinions. In COLLING'04, pages 1367--1373. ACL, 2004.
[10]
B. Liu. Sentiment analysis and subjectivity. Handbook of Natural Language Processing Second Edition, pages 1--38, 2010.
[11]
A. Murakami and R. Raymond. Support or oppose?: classifying positions in online debates from reply activities and opinion expressions. In COLING '10: Posters, pages 869--875.
[12]
B. Pang and L. Lee. Seeing stars: Exploiting class relationships for sentiment categorization with respect to rating scales. In ACL'05, pages 115--124. Association for Computational Linguistics.
[13]
B. Pang, L. Lee, and S. Vaithyanathan. Thumbs up?: sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. In ACL'02, pages 79--86. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2002.
[14]
S. Park, K. S. Lee, and J. Song. Contrasting opposing views of news articles on contentious issues. In ACL'11, pages 340--349, 2011.
[15]
S. Somasundaran and J. Wiebe. Recognizing stances in online debates. In ACL/AFNLP'09, pages 226--234.
[16]
S. Somasundaran and J. Wiebe. Recognizing stances in ideological on-line debates. In CAAGET'10, NAACL-HLT'10, pages 116--124. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2010.
[17]
M. Thomas, B. Pang, and L. Lee. Get out the vote: Determining support or opposition from Congressional floor-debate transcripts. In Proceedings of EMNLP, pages 327--335, 2006.
[18]
D. Tversky, Amos; Kahneman. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. pages 453--458, 1981.
[19]
A. Yessenalina, Y. Yue, and C. Cardie. Multi-level structured models for document-level sentiment classification. In EMNLP'10, pages 1046--1056. Association for Computational Linguistics.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Course Scheduling Made Easier: A User-Friendly Web-Based Timetabling Tool Using PyGLPKCooperative Design, Visualization, and Engineering10.1007/978-3-031-71315-6_26(243-252)Online publication date: 15-Sep-2024
  • (2020)Text Mining in Big Data AnalyticsBig Data and Cognitive Computing10.3390/bdcc40100014:1(1)Online publication date: 16-Jan-2020
  • (2018)Review on Recent Advances in Information Mining From Big Consumer Opinion Data for Product DesignJournal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering10.1115/1.404108719:1(010801)Online publication date: 17-Sep-2018
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Unsupervised discovery of opposing opinion networks from forum discussions

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CIKM '12: Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management
        October 2012
        2840 pages
        ISBN:9781450311564
        DOI:10.1145/2396761
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Sponsors

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 29 October 2012

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. linear programming
        2. online forums
        3. opinion analysis
        4. optimization
        5. social network analysis

        Qualifiers

        • Short-paper

        Conference

        CIKM'12
        Sponsor:

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate 1,861 of 8,427 submissions, 22%

        Upcoming Conference

        CIKM '25

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
        Reflects downloads up to 28 Feb 2025

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2024)Course Scheduling Made Easier: A User-Friendly Web-Based Timetabling Tool Using PyGLPKCooperative Design, Visualization, and Engineering10.1007/978-3-031-71315-6_26(243-252)Online publication date: 15-Sep-2024
        • (2020)Text Mining in Big Data AnalyticsBig Data and Cognitive Computing10.3390/bdcc40100014:1(1)Online publication date: 16-Jan-2020
        • (2018)Review on Recent Advances in Information Mining From Big Consumer Opinion Data for Product DesignJournal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering10.1115/1.404108719:1(010801)Online publication date: 17-Sep-2018
        • (2018)Identifying comparative customer requirements from product online reviews for competitor analysisEngineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence10.1016/j.engappai.2015.12.00549:C(61-73)Online publication date: 27-Dec-2018
        • (2018)DICHWorld Wide Web10.1007/s11280-014-0279-z18:4(795-818)Online publication date: 25-Dec-2018
        • (2018)Debate Stance Classification Using Word EmbeddingsBig Data Analytics and Knowledge Discovery10.1007/978-3-319-98539-8_29(382-395)Online publication date: 8-Aug-2018
        • (2017)We Make Choices We Think are Going to Save UsProceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion10.1145/3041021.3055134(1073-1081)Online publication date: 3-Apr-2017
        • (2015)BiasWatchProceedings of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management10.1145/2806416.2806573(213-222)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2015
        • (2015)Identifying Controversial Wikipedia Articles Using Editor Collaboration NetworksACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/26300756:1(1-24)Online publication date: 27-Mar-2015
        • (2015)Visual Opinion Analysis of Threaded DiscussionsProceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshop (ICDMW)10.1109/ICDMW.2015.65(646-651)Online publication date: 14-Nov-2015
        • Show More Cited By

        View Options

        Login options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Figures

        Tables

        Media

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media