skip to main content
10.1145/2401836.2401853acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesicmi-mlmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Semantic interpretation of eye movements using designed structures of displayed contents

Published:26 October 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a novel framework to interpret eye movements using semantic relations and spatial layouts of displayed contents, i.e., the designed structure. We represent eye movements in a multi-scale, interval-based manner and associate them with various semantic relations derived from the designed structure. In preliminary experiments, we apply the proposed framework to the eye movements when browsing catalog contents, and confirm the effectiveness of the framework via user-state estimation.

References

  1. R. Bednarik, H. Vrzakova, and M. Hradis. What do you want to do next: A novel approach for intent prediction in gaze-based interaction. In ETRA, pages 83--90, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. B. Brandherm, H. Prendinger, and M. Ishizuka. Interest estimation based on dynamic bayesian networks for visual attentive presentation agents. In ICMI, pages 346--349, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. Eivazi and R. Bednarik. Predicting problem-solving behavior and performance levels from visual attention data. In IUI, pages 9--16, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. S. Eivazi, R. Bednarik, M. Tukiainen, M. von und zu Fraunberg, V. Leinonen, and J. E. Jääskeläinen. Gaze Behaviour of Expert and Novice Microneurosurgeons Differs During Observations of Tumor Removal Recordings. In ETRA, pages 377--380, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Y. Nakano and R. Ishii. Estimating user's engagement from eye-gaze behaviors in human-agent conversations. In IUI, pages 139--148, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. P. Qvarfordt and S. Zhai. Conversing with the user based on eye-gaze patterns. In CHI, pages 221--230, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. A. Witkin. Scale-space filtering. In IJCAI, pages 1019--1022, 1983. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. A. Yarbus. Eye movements and vision. Plenum, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. R. Yonetani, H. Kawashima, and T. Matsuyama. Multi-mode saliency dynamics model for analyzing gaze and attention. In ETRA, pages 115--122, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Semantic interpretation of eye movements using designed structures of displayed contents

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        Gaze-In '12: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Eye Gaze in Intelligent Human Machine Interaction
        October 2012
        88 pages
        ISBN:9781450315166
        DOI:10.1145/2401836

        Copyright © 2012 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 26 October 2012

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate19of21submissions,90%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader