skip to main content
research-article

Contextual and active learning-based affect-sensing from virtual drama improvisation

Published:30 January 2013Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Affect interpretation from open-ended drama improvisation is a challenging task. This article describes experiments in using latent semantic analysis to identify discussion themes and potential target audiences for those improvisational inputs without strong affect indicators. A context-based affect-detection is also implemented using a supervised neural network with the consideration of emotional contexts of most intended audiences, sentence types, and interpersonal relationships. In order to go beyond the constraints of predefined scenarios and improve the system's robustness, min-margin-based active learning is implemented. This active learning algorithm also shows great potential in dealing with imbalanced affect classifications. Evaluation results indicated that the context-based affect detection achieved an averaged precision of 0.826 and an averaged recall of 0.813 for affect detection of the test inputs from the Crohn's disease scenario using three emotion labels: positive, negative, and neutral, and an averaged precision of 0.868 and an average recall of 0.876 for the test inputs from the school bullying scenario. Moreover, experimental evaluation on a benchmark data set for active learning demonstrated that active learning was able to greatly reduce human annotation efforts for the training of affect detection, and also showed promising robustness in dealing with open-ended example inputs beyond the improvisation of the chosen scenarios.

References

  1. Batliner, A., Steidl, S., Hacker, C., and Nöth, E. 2008. Private emotions vs. social interaction—A data-driven approach towards analysing emotions in speech. In User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 175--206. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bischoping, K. 1993. Gender differences in conversation topics, 1922--1990. Sex Roles 28, 1/2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Chen, J., Schein, A., Ungar, L., and Palmer, M. 2006. An empirical study of the behavior of active learning for word sense disambiguation. In Proceedings of the Main Conference on Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association of Computational Linguistics. 120--127. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Ekman, P. 1992. An argument for basic emotions. Cognition Emotion 6, 169--200.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Endrass, B., Rehm, M., and André, E. 2011. Planning small talk behavior with cultural influences for multiagent systems. Comput. Speech Lang. 25, 2, 158--174. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Haffner, P., Tur, G., and Wright, J. 2003. Optimizing SVMs for complex call classification. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Hareli, S. and Rafaeli, A. 2008. Emotion cycles: On the social influence of emotion in organizations. Res. Organiz. Behav. 28, 35--59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Holub, A., Perona, P., and Burl, M.C. 2008. Entropy-based active learning for object recognition. In Proceedings CVPRW. 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Kappas, A. 2010. Smile when you read this, whether you like it or not: Conceptual challenges to affect detection. IEEE Trans. Affective Comput. 1, 1, 38--41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Landauer, T.K. and Dumais, S. 2008. Latent semantic analysis. Scholarpedia 3, 11, 43--56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Lewis, D. and Gale, W. 1994. A sequential algorithm for training text classifiers. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, New York, 3--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Li, H. and Yamanishi, K. 1997. Document classification using a finite mixture model. In Proceedings of Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-97). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Li, S., Ju, S., Zhou, G., and Li, X. 2012. Active learning for imbalanced sentiment classification. In Proceedings of EMNLP-CoNLL. 139--148. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Manning, C.D. 2011. Part-of-speech tagging from 97% to 100%: Is it time for some linguistics? In Proceedings of CICLing. Lectur Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6608. Springer, Berlin, 171--189. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Mower, E., Metallinou, A., Lee, C., Kazemzadeh, A., Busso, C., Lee, S., and Narayanan, S.S. 2009. Interpreting ambiguous emotional expressions. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Nahm, U.Y. and Mooney, R.J. 2000. A mutually beneficial integration of data mining and information extraction. In Proceedings of the 17th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 00). 627--632. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Neviarouskaya, A., Prendinger, H., and Ishizuka, M. 2010. Recognition of affect, judgment, and appreciation in text. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 806--814. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Olsson, F. 2008. Bootstrapping named entity recognition by means of active machine learning. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Gothenburg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Ortony, A., Clore, G.L., and Collins, A. 1988. The Cognitive Structure of Emotions. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Potts, C. and Schwarz, F. 2008. Exclamatives and heightened emotion: Extracting pragmatic generalizations from large corpora. Ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Ptaszynski, M., Dybala, P., Shi, W., Rzepka, R., and Araki, K. 2009. Towards context aware emotional intelligence in machines: Computing contextual appropriateness of affective states. In Proceedings of IJCAI. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Russell, J. 1980. A circumplex model of affect. J. Personal.Social Psychol. 39, 6, 1161--1178.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Russell, J.A., Bachorowski, J.A., and Fernandez-Dols, J.M. 2003. Facial and vocal expressions of emotion, Ann. Rev. Psychol. 42, 329--349.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Scherer. K.R. 2003. Vocal communication of emotion: A review of research paradigms. Speech Comm. 40, 227--256. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Shepherd, P. 2012. The emotional response indicator. http://www.trans4mind.com/spiritual/gsr.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Sun, X. Lichtenauer, J. Valstar, M.F., Nijholt, A., and Pantic, M. 2011. A multimodal database for mimicry analysis. In Proceedings of ACII., 367--376. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Turing, A.M. 1950. Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59, 433--460.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Wang, Z. Lee, J., and Marsella, S. 2011. Towards more comprehensive listening behavior: Beyond the bobble head. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Weber, J.S. and Pollack, M.E. 2007. Entropy-driven online active learning for interactive calendar management. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 141--150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Widdows, D. and Cohen, T. 2010. The semantic vectors package: New algorithms and public tools for distributional semantics. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing, IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Yu, H. 2005. SVM selective sampling for ranking with application to data retrieval. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD). ACM, New York, 354--363. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Zhang, L. 2010. Exploitation on contextual affect sensing and dynamic relationship interpretation. ACM Comput. Entertain. 8, 3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Zhang, L., Gillies, M., Dhaliwal, K., Gower, A., Robertson, D., and Crabtree, B. 2009. E-drama: Facilitating online role-play using an AI actor and emotionally expressive characters. Int. J. Artif. Intell .Edu. 19, 1, 5--38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Zhu, J., Wang, H., Yao, T., and Tsou, B.K. 2008. Active learning with sampling by uncertainty and density for word sense disambiguation and text classification. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (Coling '08). 1137--1144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Contextual and active learning-based affect-sensing from virtual drama improvisation

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Speech and Language Processing
        ACM Transactions on Speech and Language Processing   Volume 9, Issue 4
        January 2013
        56 pages
        ISSN:1550-4875
        EISSN:1550-4883
        DOI:10.1145/2407736
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2013 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 30 January 2013
        • Accepted: 1 October 2012
        • Revised: 1 August 2012
        • Received: 1 March 2012
        Published in tslp Volume 9, Issue 4

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader