skip to main content
10.1145/2414536.2414602acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Using galvanic skin response for cognitive load measurement in arithmetic and reading tasks

Authors Info & Claims
Published:26 November 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Galvanic Skin Response (GSR) has recently attracted researchers' attention as a prospective physiological indicator of cognitive load and emotions. However, it has commonly been investigated through single or few measures and in one experimental scenario. In this research, aiming to perform a comprehensive study, we have assessed GSR data captured from two different experiments, one including text reading tasks and the other using arithmetic tasks, each imposing multiple cognitive load levels. We have examined temporal and spectral features of GSR against different task difficulty levels. ANOVA test was applied for the statistical evaluation. Obtained results show the strong significance of the explored features, especially the spectral ones, in cognitive workload measurement in the two studied experiments.

References

  1. Berka, C., Levendowski, D. J., Lumicao, M. N., Yau, A., Davis, G., Zivkovic, V. T., Olmstead, R. E., Tremoulet, P. D., Craven, P. L. EEG Correlates of Task Engagement and Mental Workload in Vigilance, Learning, and Memory Tasks. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 78, 5 (2007), B231--44.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Chandler, P., Sweller, J. Cognitive Load While Learning to Use a Computer Program. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 2 (1996), 151--170.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Engstrom, J., Johansson, E., Ostlund, J. Effects of Visual and Cognitive Load in Real and Simulated Motorway Driving. Transportation Research Part F, 8, 2 (2005), 97--120.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Haapalainen, E., Seungjun, K., Forlizzi, J. F., Dey, A. K. Psycho-Physiological Measures for Assessing Cognitive Load, In Proc. Ubicomp 2010, ACM Press (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Huttunen, K., Keränen, H., Väyrynen, E., Pääkkönen, R., Leino, T. Effect of Cognitive Load on Speech Prosody in Aviation: Evidence from Military Simulator Flights. Applied Ergonomics, 42 (2011), 348--357.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Ikehara, C. S., Crosby, M. E. Assessing Cognitive Load with Physiological Sensors. In Proc. HICSS 38 (2005), 295a -- 295a. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Leyman, E., Mirka, G., Kaber, D., Sommerich, C., (2004). Cervicobrachial Muscle Response to Cognitive Load in a Dual-Task Scenario. Ergonomics, 47(6), 625--45.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Nakasone, A.; Prendinger, H. & Ishizuka, M. Emotion Recognition from Electromyography and Skin Conductance, In Proc. BSI 2005 (2005), 219--222.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Paas, F. G. W. C. Training Strategies for Attaining Transfer of Problem-Solving Skill in Statistics: A Cognitive-Load Approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 4 (1992), 429--434.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Paas, F. G. W. C., Van Merriënboer, J. G. Instructional Control of Cognitive Load in the Training of Complex Cognitive Tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 4 (1994), 351--371.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Saadé, R. G. & Otrakji, C. A. First impressions last a lifetime: effect of interface type on disorientation and cognitive load. Computers in Human Behaviour, 23, 1 (2007), 525--535.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Setz, C., Arnrich, B., Schumm, J., La Marca, R., Tröster, G. Discriminating Stress from Cognitive Load Using a Wearable EDA Device. Technology, 14, 2 (2010), 410--417. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Shi, Y., Ruiz, N., Taib, R., Choi, E. H., Chen, F. Galvanic Skin Response (GSR) as an Index of Cognitive Load. In Proc. CHI 2007 Work-in-Progress, (2007), 2651--2656. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Sweller, J., Cognitive Load Theory, Learning Difficulty, and Instructional Design. Learning and Instruction, 4, 4 (1994), 295--312.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Wilson, G. F. An Analysis of Mental Workload in Pilots During Flight Using Multiple Psychophysiological Measures. The International Journal of Aviation 12, 1 (2009), 3--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Xu, J., Wang, Y., Chen, F., Choi, H., Li, G., Chen, S., Hussain, S. Pupillary Response Based Cognitive Workload Index Under Luminance and Emotional Changes. In Proc. CHI 2011, ACM Press (2011), 1627--1632. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Using galvanic skin response for cognitive load measurement in arithmetic and reading tasks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      OzCHI '12: Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference
      November 2012
      692 pages

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 November 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate362of729submissions,50%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader