- Apte 1993 A. Apte and T. D. Kimura, "A Comparison Study of the Pen and the Mouse in Editing Graphic Diagrams," in Proc. IEEE 1993 Symposium on Visual Languages. 1993. Bergen, Norway, 352-357.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Baker 1993 M. J. Baker and S. G. Eick, "Space-filling software visualization." Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 1995. 6(2): 119-135.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Citrin 1993 W. Citrin, "Requirements for Graphical Front Ends for Visual Languages," in Proc. IEEE 1993 Workshop on Visual Languages. 1993. Bergen, Norway, 142-151.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Citrin 1994 W. Citrin, D. Brodsky, and J. McWhirter, "Style-Based Cut-and-Paste in Graphical Editors," in Proc. Workshop on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI '94). 1994. Bari, Italy, 105-112. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Citrin 1996a W. Citrin and M. Gross, "Distributed Architectures for Pen-Based Input and Diagram Recognition," in ACM Workshop on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI '96). 1996. Gubbio, Italy, to appear. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Citrin 1996b W. Citrin and C. Santiago, "Incorporating Fisheyeing into a Visual Programming Environment," in IEEE Workshop on Visual Languages (VL '96). 1996. Boulder, CO, 20-27. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Citrin 1996c W. Citrin, C. Santiago, and B. Zorn, "Scalable Interfaces to Support Program Comprehension," in IEEE Workshop on Program Comprehension. 1996. Berlin, 123-132. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cox 1989 P. T. Cox, F. R. Giles, and T. Pietrzykowski, "Prograph: a step towards liberating programming from textual conditioning," in IEEE Workshop on Visual Languages (VL '89). 1989. Rome, 150-156.Google Scholar
- Green 1996 T. R. G. Green and M. Petre, "Usability Analysis of Visual Programming Environments: a 'cognitive dimensions' framework." Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 1996. 7(2): 131-174.Google Scholar
- Kodosky 1991 J. Kodosky, J. MacCrisken, and G. Rymar, "Visual Programming Using Structured Dataflow," in IEEE Workshop on Visual Languages (VL '91). 1991, Kobe, Japan. 34-39.Google Scholar
- Lamping 1996 J. Lamping and R. Rao, "The hyperbolic browser: a focus+context technique for visualizing large hierarchies," Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 1996. 7(1): 33-56.Google Scholar
- Meyer 1994a B. Meyer, "Pictorial Deduction in Spatial Information Systems," in IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages (VL '94). 1994. St. Louis, 23-30.Google Scholar
- Meyer 1994b B. Meyer, "Visuelle logische Sprachen zur Behandlung raeumlicher Information," Doctoral dissertation, FernUniversitaet Hagen, 1994.Google Scholar
- Muthukumarasamy 1995 J. Muthukumarasamy and J. T. Stasko, "Visualizing Program Executions on Large Data Sets Using Semantic Zooming," Technical Report GIT-GVU-95-02, Graphics, Visualization, and Usability Center, College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, 1995.Google Scholar
- Robertson 1993 G. G. Robertson, S. K. Card, and J. D. Mackinlay, "Information visualization using 3d interactive animation." Communications of the ACM, 1993. 36(4): 57-71. Google ScholarDigital Library
- von Kaenel 1992 J. von Kaenel, Cut and Paste of Complex, Interrelated Objects. Vol. 34. 1992, Zuerich: Verlag der Fachvereine.Google Scholar
Recommendations
Organizational entrepreneurship: Theoretical background, some empirical tests, and directions for future research: Research Article
Festschrift to Professor Wieslaw M. GrudzewskiThe widely held contemporary perspective on entrepreneurship is dangerously premature. Currently existing theories are insufficient to understand the dynamic interplay among entrepreneurship, the state, and external environment forces, as well as the ...
Resource-based View of Strategic Alliance Formation: Strategic and Social Effects in Entrepreneurial Firms
<P>Why do firms form strategic alliances? The traditional theoretical answer has been transaction cost explanations. Yet, these explanations which center on transaction characteristics, static efficiency, and routine situations do not capture the ...
Strategic Spillovers and Incentives for Research and Development
This paper develops a model in which a monopolist supplier can contribute to downstream product improvements by creating knowledge spillovers which downstream firms use as a substitute for their own R&D efforts. Although a market for R&D information ...
Comments