skip to main content
research-article

Surface-level path loss modeling for sensor networks in flat and irregular terrain

Published:01 April 2013Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Many wireless sensor network applications require sensor nodes to be deployed on the ground or other surfaces. However, there has been little effort to characterize the large- and small-scale path loss for surface-level radio communications. We present a comprehensive measurement of path loss and fading characteriztics for surface-level sensor nodes in the 400 MHz band in both flat and irregular outdoor terrain in an effort to improve the understanding of surface-level sensor network communications performance and to increase the accuracy of sensor network modeling and simulation. Based on our measurement results, we characterize the spatial small-scale area fading effects as a Rician distribution with a distance-dependent K-factor. We also propose a new semi-empirical path loss model for outdoor surface-level wireless sensor networks called the Surface-Level Irregular Terrain (SLIT) model. We verify our model by comparing measurement results with predicted values obtained from high-resolution digital elevation model (DEM) data and computer simulation for the 400 MHz and 2.4 GHz band. Finally, we discuss the impact of the SLIT model and demonstrate through simulation the effects when SLIT is used as the path loss model for existing sensor network protocols.

References

  1. Abdi, A., Tepedelenlioglu, C., Kaveh, M., and Giannakis, G. 2001. On the estimation of the k parameter for the rice fading distribution. IEEE Commun. Lett. 5, 3, 92--94.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Andersen, J. B., Rappaport, T. S., and Yoshida, S. 1995. Propagation measurements and models for wireless communications channels. IEEE Commun. Mag. 33, 1, 42--49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Buettner, M., Yee, G. V., Anderson, E., and Han, R. 2006. X-MAC: A short preamble MAC protocol for duty-cycled wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. 307--320. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bullington, K. 1947. Radio propagation at frequencies above 30 megacycles. IRE 35, 10, 1122--1136.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Cerpa, A., Busek, N., and Estrin, D. 2003. SCALE: A tool for simple connectivity assessment in lossy environments. Tech. rep., University of California, Los Angeles, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Cerpa, A., Wong, J. L., Potkonjak, M., and Estrin, D. 2005. Temporal properties of low power wireless links: Modeling and implications on multi-hop routing. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing MobiHoc'05. 414--425. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Chong, P. K., Yoo, S., Kim, S. H., and Kim, D. 2011. Wind-blown foliage and human induced fading in ground-surface narrowband communications at 400 mhz. IEEE Trans. Vehicular Technol. 60, 4, 1326--1336.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Cox, D. C., Murray, R. R., and Norris, A. W. 1983. Measurements of 800mhz radio transmission into buildings with metallic walls. Bell Sys. Tech. J. 9, 62, 2695--2717.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Deepak, G., Krishnamachari, B., Woo, A., Culler, D., Estrin, D., and Wicker, S. 2002. Complex behavior at scale: An experimental study of low-power wireless sensor networks. Tech. rep. UCLA/CSD-TR 02-0013, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Edwards, R. and Durkin, J. 1969. Computer prediction of service areas for v.h.f. mobile radio networks. Proc. Insti. Elect. Eng. 116, 9, 1493--1500.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Egli, J. J. 1957. Radio propagation above 40 mc over irregular terrain. Proc. IRE 45, 10, 1383--1391.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Foran, R. A., Welch, T. B., and Walker, M. J. 1999. Very near ground radio frequency propagation measurements and analysis for military applications. In IEEE Military Communications Conference Proceedings. Vol. 1. 336--340.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Hashim, M. H. and Stavrou, S. 2005. Wind influence on radio waves propagating through vegetation at 1.8 ghz. IEEE Antenna Wirel. Propagation Lett. 4, 143--146.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Hoffman, H. and Cox, D. 1982. Attenuation of 900 mhz radio waves propagating into a metal building. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagation 30, 4, 808--811.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. IEEE. 1998. IEEE standard definitions of terms for radio wave propagation. IEEE Std 211-1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Joshi, G. G., Dietrich, C. B., Anderson, C. R., Newhall, W. G., Davis, W. A., Isaacs, J., and Barnett, G. 2005. Near-ground channel measurements over line-of-sight and forested paths. In IEE Proceedings—Microwave, Antennas and Propagation. 589--596.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Kajiwara, A. 2000. Lmds radio channel obstructed by foliage. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications. Vol. 3. 1583--1587.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Karp, B. N. 2000. Geographic routing for wireless networks. Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Kim, H.-S. and Narayanan, R. A. 2002. A new measurement technique for obtaining the complex relative permittivity of terrain surfaces. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 40, 5, 1190--1194.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Lee, W. C. 1982. Mobile Communications Engineering. McGraw-Hill Professional. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Liu, S., Fan, K.-W., and Sinha, P. 2009. Cmac: An energy-efficient mac layer protocol using convergent packet forwarding for wireless sensor networks. ACM Trans. Sen. Netw. 5, 1--34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Longley, A. G. and Rice, P. L. 1968. Prediction of tropospheric radio transmission over irregular terrain, a computer method-1968. Tech. rep., U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. July. ESSA Tech. Rep. ERL 79-ITS 67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Martfnez-Sala, A., Molina-Garcia-Pardo, J.-M., Egea-Lopez, E., Vales-Alonso, J., Juan-Llacer, L., and Garcia-Haro, J. 2005. An accurate radio channel model for wireless sensor networks simulation. J. Communi. Netw. 7, 4, 401--407.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Norton, K. A. 1937. The physical reality of space and surface waves in the radiation field of radio antennas. IRE 25, 9, 1192--1202.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. NS2. 2009. NS-2. http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Parsons, J. D. 1992. The Mobile Radio Propagation Channel. Wiley, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Perkins, C., Belding-Royer, E., and Das, S. 2003. Ad hoc on-demand distance vector (aodv) routing. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3561.txt. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Qualnet. 2009. Qualnet. http://www.scalable-networks.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Rappaport, T. S. 2001. Wireless Communications: Principles and Practice. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Sohrabi, K., Manriquez, B., and Pottie, G. J. 1999. Near ground wideband channel measurement in 800-1000 mhz. In Proceedings of the 49th IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference. Vol. 1. 571--574.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Sommerfeld, A. 1909. Propagation of waves in wireless telegraphy. Ann. Physics 28, 665--737.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Su, W. and Alzaghal, M. 2009. Channel propagation characteristics of wireless micaz sensor nodes. Ad Hoc Netw. 7, 6, 1183--1193. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Texas Instruments. 2008a. Cc1101 data sheet (rev. d). http://focus.ti.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Texas Instruments. 2008b. Design Note DN505: RSSI Interpretation and Timing. http://focus.ti.com/lit/an/swra114b/swra114b.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Wait, J. R. 1998. The ancient and modern history of em ground-wave propagation. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Mag. 40, 5, 7--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Welch, T. B., Wood, J. R., McParlin, R. W., Schulze, L. K., Flaherty, T P., I., Carlone Hanson, S. G., Cahill, R. J., and Foran, R. A. 2000. Very near ground rf propagation measurements for wireless systems. In IEEE Military Communications Conference Proceedings. Vol. 3. 2556--2558.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Wong, K. J. and Arvind, D. K. 2005. Specknets: New challenges for wireless communication protocols. In Proceedigns of the 3rd International Conference on Information Technology and Applications (ICITA'05). 2, 728--733. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Woo, A., Tong, T., and Culler, D. 2003. Taming the underlying challenges of reliable multihop routing in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys'03). 14--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Woyach, K., Puccinelli, D., and Haenggi, M. 2006. Sensorless sensing in wireless networks: Implementation and measurements. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc and Wireless Networks. 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Yoo, S., Chong, P. K., and Kim, D. 2009. S3: School zone safety system based on wireless sensor network. Sensors 9, 8, 5968--5988.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Zenneck, J. 1907. Propagation of plane em waves along a plane conducting surface. Ann. Physics 23, 846--866.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Zhao, J. and Govindan, R. 2003. Understanding packet delivery performance in dense wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems SenSys'03. 1--13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Zhou, G., He, T., Krishnamurthy, S., and Stankovic, J. A. 2004. Impact of radio irregularity on wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services MobiSys'04. 125--138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Zhou, G., He, T., Krishnamurthy, S., and Stankovic, J. A. 2006. Models and solutions for radio irregularity in wireless sensor networks. ACM Trans. Sen. Netw. 2, 221--262. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Zorzi, M. and Rao, R. R. 2003. Geographic random forwarding (GeRaF) for ad hoc and sensor networks: Energy and latency performance. IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput. 2, 4, 349--365. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Surface-level path loss modeling for sensor networks in flat and irregular terrain

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks
          ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks  Volume 9, Issue 2
          March 2013
          532 pages
          ISSN:1550-4859
          EISSN:1550-4867
          DOI:10.1145/2422966
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2013 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 April 2013
          • Accepted: 1 January 2012
          • Revised: 1 January 2011
          • Received: 1 April 2010
          Published in tosn Volume 9, Issue 2

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader