skip to main content
10.1145/2441776.2441810acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Mining smartphone data to classify life-facets of social relationships

Published: 23 February 2013 Publication History

Abstract

People engage with many overlapping social networks and enact diverse social roles across different facets of their lives. Unfortunately, many online social networking services reduce most people's contacts to "friend". A richer computational model of relationships would be useful for a number of applications such as managing privacy settings and organizing communications. In this paper, we take a step towards a richer computational model by using call and text message logs from mobile phones to classifying contacts according to life facet (family, work, and social). We extract various features such as communication intensity, regularity, medium, and temporal tendency, and classify the relationships using machine-learning techniques. Our experimental results on 40 users showed that we could classify life facets with up to 90.5% accuracy. The most relevant features include call duration, channel selection, and time of day for the communication.

References

[1]
Ackerman, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., and Schaller, M. Is friendship akin to kinship? Evolution and Human Behavior, 28 (2007), 365--374.
[2]
Altshuler, Y., Fire, M., Aharony, N., Elovici, Y., and Pentland, A. How many makes a crowd? On the evolution of learning as a factor of community coverage. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling, and Prediction (2012), 43--52.
[3]
Backstrom, L., Huttenlocher, D., Kleinberg, J., and Lan, X. Group formation in large social networks: membership, growth, and evolution. In Proc. KDD '06 (2006), 44--54.
[4]
Battestini, A., Setlur, V., and Sohn, T. A large scale study of text-messaging use. In Proc. MobileHCI '10 (2010), 229--238.
[5]
Burke, M. Reading, Writing, Relationships: The Impact of Social Network Sites on Relationships and Well-Being. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 2011.
[6]
Chau, M. and Xu, J. Mining communities and their relationships in blogs: A study of online hate groups. Int. J. of Human-Computer Studies, 65 (2007), 57--70.
[7]
Chittaranjan, G., Blom, J., and Gatica-Perez, D. Mining large-scale smartphone data for personality studies. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, (in Press).
[8]
Christakis, N. A. and Fowler, J. H. Connected: The Surprising Power of Our Social Networks and How They Shape Our Lives. Little, Brown and Company, New York, 2009.
[9]
Clark, S. C. Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human Relations, 53, (2000), 747--770.
[10]
Cranshaw, J., Toch, E., Hong, J., Kittur, A., and Sadeh, N. Bridging the gap between physical location and online social networks. In Proc. Ubicomp '10 (2010), 119--128.
[11]
Cummings, J. N., Lee, J. B., and Kraut, R. Communication technology and friendship during the transition from high school to college. New York: Oxford University Press, City, 2006.
[12]
DiMicco, J. M. and Millen, D. R. Identity management: Multiple presentations of self in Facebook. In Proc. GROUP '07 (2007), 383--386.
[13]
Do, T. M. T. and Gatica-Perez, D. Human interaction discovery in smartphone proximity networks. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, (in Press).
[14]
Dong, W., Lepri, B., and Pentland, A. Modeling the co-evolution of behaviors and social relationships using mobile phone data. In Proc. MUM '11 (2011), 134--143.
[15]
Eagle, N. and Pentland, A. Reality mining: Sensing complex social systems. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 10 (2006), 255--268.
[16]
Eagle, N., Pentland, A., and Lazer, D. Inferring social network structure using mobile phone data. Proc. National Academy of Sciences, 106, 36 (2009), 15274--15278.
[17]
Farnham, S. and Churchill, E. F. Faceted identity, faceted lives: Social and technical issues with being yourself online. In Proc. CSCW 2011 (2011), 359--368.
[18]
Gilbert, E. and Karahalios, K. Predicting tie strength with social media. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2009), 211--220.
[19]
Granovetter, M. S. The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78, 6 (1973), 1360--1380.
[20]
Grob, R., Kuhn, M., Wattenhofer, R., and Wirz, M. Cluestr: mobile social networking for enhanced group communication. In. Proc. Group '09 (2009), 81--90.
[21]
Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., and Witten, I. H. The WEKA data mining software: An update. SIGKDD Explorations, 11, 1 (2009), 10--18.
[22]
Hill, R. A. and Dunbar, R. I. M. Social network size in humans. Human Nature, 14 (2003), 53--72.
[23]
Http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-501465_162-20105561-501465.html
[24]
Jones, S. and O'Neill, E. Feasibility of structural network clustering for group-based privacy control in social networks. In Proc. SOUPS (2010), 1--13.
[25]
Kelley, P. G., Brewer, R., Mayer, Y., Cranor, L. F., and Sadeh, N. M. An Investigation into Facebook Friend Grouping. In Proc. INTERACT (2011), 216--233.
[26]
Lampinen, A., Tamminen, S., and Oulasvirta, A. All my people right here, right now: Management of group co-presence on a social networking site. In Proc. GROUP '09 (2009), 281--290.
[27]
Madan, A., Cebrian, M., Lazer, D., and Pentland, A. Social sensing for epidemiological behavior change. In Proc. Ubicomp '10 (2010), 291--300.
[28]
McCarty, C. Structure in personal networks. J. of Social Structure, 3 (2005).
[29]
Mesch, G. S. Social context and communication channels choice among adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 25 (2009), 244--251.
[30]
Min, J.-K. and Cho, S.-B. Mobile human network management and recommendation by probabilistic social mining. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, 41, 3 (2011), 761--771.
[31]
Mok, D., Wellman, B., and Basu, R. Did distance matter before the Internet? Interpersonal contact and support in the 1970s. Social Networks, 29 (2007), 430--461.
[32]
Newman, M. E. J. Detecting community structure in networks. The European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, 38 (2004), 321--330.
[33]
Nippert-Eng, C. E. Home and Work. The University of Chicago Press, 1995.
[34]
Olson, J., Grudin, J., and Horvitz, E. A study of preferences for sharing and privacy. In Proc. CHI '05 (2005), 1985--1988.
[35]
Onnela, J.-P., Saramäki, J., Hyvönen, J., Szabó, G., Lazer, D., Kaski, K., Kertész, J., and Barabási, A.-L. Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks. Proc. National Academy of Sciences, 104 (2007), 7332--7336.
[36]
Ozenc, F. K. and Farnham, S. D. Life "modes" in social media. In Proc. CHI '11 (2011), 561--570.
[37]
Roberts, S. G. B. and Dunbar, R. I. M. Communication in social networks: Effects of kinship, network size, and emotional closeness. Personal Relationships, 18 (2011), 439--452.
[38]
Skeels, M. M. and Grudin, J. When social networks cross boundaries: A case study of workplace use of Facebook and LinkedIn. In Proc. GROUP '09 (2009), 95--104.
[39]
Spencer, L. and Pahl, R. E. Rethinking Friendship: Hidden Solidarities Today. Princeton University Press, 2006.
[40]
Tajfel, H. Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. London: Academic Press, 1978.
[41]
Wiese, J., Kelley, P. G., Cranor, L. F., Dabbish, L., Hong, J. I., and Zimmerman, J. Are you close with me? Are you nearby? Investigating social groups, closeness, and willingness to share. In Proc. UbiComp '11 (2011), 197--206.
[42]
Wilson, C., Boe, B., Sala, A., Puttaswamy, K. P. N., and Zhao, B. Y. User interactions in social networks and their implications. In Proc. the 4th ACM European Conference on Computer Systems (2009), 205--218.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Lengthy early morning instant messages reveal more than you think: Analysing interpersonal relationships using mobile communication metadataPervasive and Mobile Computing10.1016/j.pmcj.2023.10178191(101781)Online publication date: Apr-2023
  • (2023)What makes IM users (un)responsiveInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102983172:COnline publication date: 1-Apr-2023
  • (2022)Lack of access to a phone and high social media use was associated with elevated physiological arousal in college students exposed to an acute laboratory stressorBIOS10.1893/BIOS-D-21-0001093:3Online publication date: 1-Sep-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Mining smartphone data to classify life-facets of social relationships

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CSCW '13: Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work
    February 2013
    1594 pages
    ISBN:9781450313315
    DOI:10.1145/2441776
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 23 February 2013

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. interpersonal relationships mining
    2. life-facets
    3. mobile social network
    4. smartphone

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    CSCW '13
    Sponsor:
    CSCW '13: Computer Supported Cooperative Work
    February 23 - 27, 2013
    Texas, San Antonio, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

    Upcoming Conference

    CSCW '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)24
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
    Reflects downloads up to 07 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Lengthy early morning instant messages reveal more than you think: Analysing interpersonal relationships using mobile communication metadataPervasive and Mobile Computing10.1016/j.pmcj.2023.10178191(101781)Online publication date: Apr-2023
    • (2023)What makes IM users (un)responsiveInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102983172:COnline publication date: 1-Apr-2023
    • (2022)Lack of access to a phone and high social media use was associated with elevated physiological arousal in college students exposed to an acute laboratory stressorBIOS10.1893/BIOS-D-21-0001093:3Online publication date: 1-Sep-2022
    • (2021)“How Come You Don’t Call Me?” Smartphone Communication App Usage as an Indicator of Loneliness and Social Well-Being across the Adult Lifespan during the COVID-19 PandemicInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health10.3390/ijerph1812621218:12(6212)Online publication date: 8-Jun-2021
    • (2021)Distinguishing IM Communication Patterns with Relationship and Conversation TopicsCompanion Publication of the 2021 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1145/3462204.3481752(121-125)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2021
    • (2021)Personal Context from Mobile Phones—Case Study 5Intelligent Computing for Interactive System Design10.1145/3447404.3447424(341-376)Online publication date: 23-Feb-2021
    • (2020)Machine Learning for Phone-Based Relationship EstimationProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/33698203:4(1-23)Online publication date: 14-Sep-2020
    • (2020)Data-driven Computational Social Science: A SurveyBig Data Research10.1016/j.bdr.2020.100145(100145)Online publication date: Aug-2020
    • (2019)NFRR: A Novel Family Relationship Recognition Algorithm Based on Telecom Social Network SpectrumIEICE Transactions on Information and Systems10.1587/transinf.2018DAP0008E102.D:4(759-767)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2019
    • (2019)Connecting IM pattern and selective perceived responsiveness to relationshipAdjunct Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers10.1145/3341162.3344841(1070-1074)Online publication date: 9-Sep-2019
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media