skip to main content
10.1145/2441776.2441930acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Trend makers and trend spotters in a mobile application

Published: 23 February 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Media marketers and researchers have shown great interest in what becomes a trend within social media sites. Their interests have focused on analyzing the items that become trends, and done so in the context of Youtube, Twitter, and Foursquare. Here we move away from these three platforms and consider a new mobile social-networking application with which users share pictures of "cool" things they find in the real-world. Besides, we shift focus from items to people. Specifically, we focus on those who generate trends (trend makers) and those who spread them (trend spotters). We analyze the complete dataset of user interactions, and characterize trend makers (spotters) by activity, geographical, and demographic features. We find that there are key characteristics that distinguish them from typical users. Also, we provide statistical models that accurately identify who is a trend maker (spotter). These contributions not only expand current studies on trends in social media but also promise to inform the design of recommender systems, and new products.

References

[1]
Aral, S. and Walker, D. Identifying Influential and Susceptible Members of Social Networks. Science, 337, 2012.
[2]
H. Becker, M. Naaman, and L. Gravano. Learning Similarity Metrics for Event Identification in Social Media. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM), 2010.
[3]
H. Becker, M. Naaman, and L. Gravano. Beyond Trending Topics: Real-world Event Identification on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 5th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM), 2011.
[4]
M. Cha, H. Haddadi, F. Benevenuto, and K. Gummadi. Measuring User Influence in Twitter: The Million Follower Fallacy. In Proceedings of the 4th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM), 2010.
[5]
Z. Cheng, J. Caverlee, and K. Lee. You are Where You Tweet: A Content-based Approach to Geo-locating Twitter Users. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM), 2010.
[6]
Z. Cheng, J. Caverlee, K. Lee, and D. Sui. Exploring Millions of Footprints in Location Sharing Services. In Proceedings of the 5th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM), 2011.
[7]
R. Crane and D. Sornette. Robust Dynamic Classes Revealed by Measuring the Response Function of a Social System. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), volume 105, October 2008.
[8]
danah boyd. The Future of Privacy: How Privacy Norms Can Inform Regulation. Invited Talk at the 32nd International Conference of Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners, October 2010.
[9]
danah boyd. Designing for Social Norms (or How Not to Create Angry Mobs). http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2011/08/05/design-social-norms.html, August 2011.
[10]
C. Droge, M. Stanko, and W. Pollitte. Lead Users and Early Adopters on the Web: The Role of New Technology Product Blogs. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(1), 2010.
[11]
A. Gelman and J. Hill. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge University Press, 2006.
[12]
M. Gladwell. The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. Little, Brown and Company, 2000.
[13]
S. González-Bailón, J. Borge-Holthoefer, A. Rivero, and Y. Moreno. The Dynamics of Protest Recruitment through an Online Network. Scientific reports, 1, 2011.
[14]
A. Goyal, F. Bonchi, and L. V. Lakshmanan. Learning Influence Probabilities in Social Networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM), 2010.
[15]
E. Katz and P. Lazarsfeld. Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications. 1955.
[16]
D. Kempe, J. Kleinberg, and E. Tardos. Influential Nodes in a Diffusion Model for Social Networks. In Automata, Languages and Programming, volume 3580. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, 2005.
[17]
H. Kwak, C. Lee, H. Park, and S. Moon. What is Twitter, a Social Network or a News Media? In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on World Wide Web (WWW), 2010.
[18]
M. Muller, N. S. Shami, D. R. Millen, and J. Feinberg. We are all Lurkers: Consuming Behaviors among Authors and Readers in an Enterprise File-Sharing Service. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP), 2010.
[19]
M. Naaman, H. Becker, and L. Gravano. Hip and Trendy: Characterizing Emerging Trends on Twitter. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 65, May 2011.
[20]
C. Neustaedter, A. Tang, and J. K. Tejinder. The Role of Community and Groupware in Geocache Creation and Maintenance. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), 2010.
[21]
J.-P. Onnela, S. Arbesman, M. C. González, A.-L. Barabási, and N. A. Christakis. Geographic Constraints on Social Network Groups. PloS One, 6, 2011.
[22]
M. Panik. Advanced Statistics From an Elementary Point of View. Academic Press, 2005.
[23]
D. Saez-Trumper, G. Comarela, V. Almeida, R. Baeza-Yates, and F. Benevenuto. Finding Trendsetters in Information Networks. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), 2012.
[24]
C. Steinfield, N. B. Ellison, and C. Lampe. Social Capital, Self-esteem, and Use of Online Social Network Sites: A Longitudinal Analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 2008.
[25]
J. Tang, J. Sun, C. Wang, and Z. Yang. Social Influence Analysis in Large-scale Networks. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), 2009.
[26]
D. Watts. Challenging the Influentials Hypothesis. Measuring Word of Mouth, 3, 2007.
[27]
D. Watts and S. Strogatz. Collective Dynamics of Small-world Networks. Nature, 393(6684), 1998.
[28]
D. J. Watts. Everything Is Obvious: *Once You Know the Answer. Crown Business, March 2011.
[29]
J. Weng, E.-P. Lim, J. Jiang, and Q. He. TwitterRank: Finding Topic-sensitive Influential Twitterers. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM), 2010.
[30]
L. Yu, S. Asur, and B. A. Huberman. What Trends in Chinese Social Media. The 5th Workshop on Social Network Mining and Analysis (SNA-KDD), 2011.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)FORTAGONO: A Model for the Technological Mediation of the Teaching and Learning ProcessesIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.325444111(64294-64323)Online publication date: 2023
  • (2017)Forecasting success via early adoptions analysis: A data-driven studyPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.018909612:12(e0189096)Online publication date: 7-Dec-2017
  • (2014)Evolutionary habits on the webProceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web10.1145/2567948.2580067(1241-1242)Online publication date: 7-Apr-2014

Index Terms

  1. Trend makers and trend spotters in a mobile application

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CSCW '13: Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work
    February 2013
    1594 pages
    ISBN:9781450313315
    DOI:10.1145/2441776
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 23 February 2013

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. mobile
    2. social marketing

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    CSCW '13
    Sponsor:
    CSCW '13: Computer Supported Cooperative Work
    February 23 - 27, 2013
    Texas, San Antonio, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

    Upcoming Conference

    CSCW '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 28 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)FORTAGONO: A Model for the Technological Mediation of the Teaching and Learning ProcessesIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.325444111(64294-64323)Online publication date: 2023
    • (2017)Forecasting success via early adoptions analysis: A data-driven studyPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.018909612:12(e0189096)Online publication date: 7-Dec-2017
    • (2014)Evolutionary habits on the webProceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web10.1145/2567948.2580067(1241-1242)Online publication date: 7-Apr-2014

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media