skip to main content
10.1145/2445196.2445290acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

On the nature of fires and how to spark them when you're not there

Published:06 March 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Traditionally, computer science education research contributes new tools, techniques, and theories to improve institutionalized learning spaces e.g. classrooms. However, we take the position that the study and improvement of computer science learning spaces outside the classroom are just as important. We take a step toward illuminating the critical qualities of non-institutional computer science learning spaces by engaging in a grounded-theoretical examination of first-hand accounts of non-institutional learning. To further study the topic, we attempted to recreate (in the lab) a learning environment with many qualities that characterize non-institutional learning. To make this possible, we employed a modified version of CodeSpells -- a video game designed to teach Java programming in a way that engenders the sense of sustained, playful, creative exploration driven entirely by the learner. This study introduced 40 girls, ages 10 to 12, to programming for the first time. We use the results of both studies to develop a theoretical framework which we use to examine existing tools such as Scratch, Alice, and educational games in a new light.

References

  1. Eric Mazur. 2009. Farewell, Lecture? Science, 323, 50--51 (2009).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Christopher D. Hundhausen, N Hari Narayanan, and Martha E. Crosby. 2008. Exploring studio-based instructional models for computing education. In Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 392--396. DOI=10.1145/1352135.1352271 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Andrew Luxton-Reilly and Paul Denny. 2009. A simple framework for interactive games in CS1. SIGCSE Bull. 41, 1 (March 2009), 216--220. DOI=10.1145/1539024.1508947 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Julian Sefton-Green. 2004. Literature Review in Informal Learning with Technology Outside School, 2004. A NESTA Futurelab Series -report 7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Kylie A. Peppler and Yasmin B. Kafai. 2007. From supergoo to scratch: exploring creative digital media production in informal learning. Learning, Media and Technology 32, 2 (2007), 149--166.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. John H. Maloney, Kylie Peppler, Yasmin Kafai, Mitchel Resnick, and Natalie Rusk. 2008. Programming by choice: urban youth learning programming with scratch. In Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 367--371. DOI=10.1145/1352135.1352260. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. CEOHP. 2008. Computing Educators Oral History Project. (April 2012). www.ceohp.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Michael Hewner and Mark Guzdial. 2008. Attitudes about computing in postsecondary graduates. In Proceedings of the Fourth international Workshop on Computing Education Research (ICER '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 71--78. DOI=10.1145/1404520.1404528. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Anselm Strauss and Juliet Corbin. 1990. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, Calif.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. http://sarahesper.ucsd.edu/CodeSpells, August 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. John Maloney, Mitchel Resnick, Natalie Rusk, Brian Silverman, and Evelyn Eastmond. 2010. The Scratch Programming Language and Environment. Trans. Comput. Educ. 10, 4, Article 16 (November 2010), 15 pages. DOI=10.1145/1868358.1868363. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Stephen Cooper, Wanda Dann, and Randy Pausch. 2000. Alice: a 3-D tool for introductory programming concepts. J. Comput. Small Coll. 15, 5 (April 2000), 107--116. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Matthew Dickerson. 2011. Multi-agent simulation and netlogo in the introductory computer science curriculum. J. Comput. Sci. Coll. 27, 1 (October 2011), 102--104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Michael Kölling. The greenfoot programming environment. 2010, Trans. Comput. Educ. 10, 4 (November 2010), 14:1--14:21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. William H. Bares, Luke S. Zettlemoyer, and James C. Lester. 1998. Habitable 3d learning environments for situated learning. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, ITS '98, Springer-Verlag (London, UK, UK, 1998), 76--85. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. http://robocode.sourceforge.net/, August 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Clare Richards. 2003. Teach the world to twitch: An interview with Marc Prensky, CEO and founder Games2train.com. Futurelab. www.futurelab.org.uk/resources/publications_reports_articles/web_articles/Web_Article578.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Amy Bruckman. 1999. "Can Educational Be Fun?" Game Developer's Conference, San Jose, California. (March 17th, 1999).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. On the nature of fires and how to spark them when you're not there

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGCSE '13: Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education
      March 2013
      818 pages
      ISBN:9781450318686
      DOI:10.1145/2445196

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 March 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGCSE '13 Paper Acceptance Rate111of293submissions,38%Overall Acceptance Rate1,595of4,542submissions,35%

      Upcoming Conference

      SIGCSE Virtual 2024
      SIGCSE Virtual 2024: ACM Virtual Global Computing Education Conference
      November 30 - December 1, 2024
      Virtual Event , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader