skip to main content
10.1145/2452516.2452524acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Using routine geo-coded data to identify geographical heterogeneity to reduce disparities: case studies in UK

Authors Info & Claims
Published:06 November 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper outlines a structured argument for the use of routine health and demographic data to support the delivery of equitable services that are better aligned to the needs of the populations they serve. The paper describes case studies from a nationally funded research and quality improvement programme in London, UK as examples of targeting existing services, without top-down reconfiguration, using quality improvement methodology.

Three case studies are presented each demonstrating a differing use of geocoded routine data. The first demonstrates the use of a novel composite metric for the prospective targeting of service improvement; the second shows how routine geo-coded health data can be used to support the geographical location of services; the third demonstrates how routine data can be used to evaluate the impact of improvement initiatives on disparities in healthcare. All methods provide a novel way of analyzing current service provision to ensure targeting of services where needed and contributing to the quality and cost challenges faced by healthcare providers and commissioners.

References

  1. Bisognano, M, and Kenney, C. Pursuing the Triple Aim: Seven Innovators Show the Way to Better Care, Better Health, and Lower Costs. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Communities and Local Government: The English Indices of Deprivation. 2010. Retrieved 14 July 2012: http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/corporate/statistics/indices2010Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Fremont, A. M, Bierman, A., Wicktrom, S. L., Bird, C. E., Shah, M., Escarce, J. J., Horstman, J., and Rector, T. Use of Geocoding In Managed Care Settings To Identify Disparities. Health Affairs, 24(2):516--526.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Green, S., Poots, A. J., Marcano-Belisario, J., Samarasundera, E., Green, J., Honeybourne, H., and Barnes, R. Mapping mental health service access: Achieving equity through quality improvement. Journal of Public Health, 34 Advance Access http://doi:10.1093/pubmed/fds071Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Green, S. A., Sullivan, P., Bell, D., and Barnes, R. Aligning quality improvement to population health. International Journal for Quality in Healthcare, 24(5):441--442.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Improving Access to Psychological Therapies. Retrieved 01 July 2012: http://www.iapt.nhs.uk/iapt/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. McCrone, P., Thornicroft, G., Boyle, S., Knapp, M., and Aziz. F. The development of a Local Index of Need (LIN) and its use to explain variations in social services expenditures on mental health care in England. Health and Social Care in the Community, 14(3):254--263.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. National Health Service Connecting for Health: the Secondary Uses Service programme. Retrieved 15 Jul 2012: http://www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/systemsandservices/susGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Office for National Statistics: Statistical Bulleting: Retrieved 23 July 2012: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/sape/soa-mid-year-pop-est-engl-wales-exp/mid-2010-release/stb---super-output-area---mid-2010.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Office for National Statistics: Neighbourhood Statistics. Retrieved 12 July 2012: http://neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/dissemination/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Psychological Therapy Patient Management System, Mayden. Retrieved 25 Jul 2012 http://www.iaptus.co.uk/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Quantum GIS Development Team, 2012. Quantum GIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project.Retrieved 26 July 2012: http://qgis.osgeo.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Stead, M., Hastings, G., and Eadie, D. The challenge of evaluating complex interventions: a framework for evaluating media advocacy. Health Education Research 27(4):351--364.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Using routine geo-coded data to identify geographical heterogeneity to reduce disparities: case studies in UK

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        HealthGIS '12: Proceedings of the First ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Use of GIS in Public Health
        November 2012
        93 pages
        ISBN:9781450317030
        DOI:10.1145/2452516

        Copyright © 2012 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 6 November 2012

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader