skip to main content
10.1145/2460296.2460315acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageslakConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Towards the development of multimodal action based assessment

Published:08 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we describe multimodal learning analytics techniques for understanding and identifying expertise as students engage in a hands-on building activity. Our techniques leverage process-oriented data, and demonstrate how this temporal data can be used to study student learning. The proposed techniques introduce useful insights in how to segment and analyze gesture- and action-based generally, and may also be useful for other sources of process rich data. Using this approach we uncover new ideas about how experts engage in building activities. Finally, a primary objective of this work is to motivate additional research and development in the area of authentic, automated, process-oriented assessments.

References

  1. Pea, R. (1987). Programming and problem-solving: Children's experiences with Logo. In T. O'Shea & E. Scanlon (Eds.), Educational computing (An Open University Reader). London: John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Barron, B., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Prospects and challenges for inquiry-based approaches to learning: OECD PublishingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Dewey, J. (1897). My Pedagogic Creed. School Journal 54, 77--80.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Dewey, J. (1913). Interest and effort in education. Cambridge, MA: The Riverside Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. diSessa, A. A. 2002. Why "conceptual ecology" is a good idea. In M. Limón & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice (pp. 29--60). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Siegler, R. S., & Crowley, K. (1991). The microgenetic method: A direct means for studying cognitive development. American Psychologist, 46, 606--620.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Kirsh, D. (2009). Problem Solving and Situated Cognition. In Philip Robbins & M. Aydede (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition. Cambridge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Wagner, S., Nusbaum, H., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2004) Probing the mental representation of gesture: Is handwaving spatial? Journal of Memory and Language. 50, 395--407.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Siemens, G. and Baker, R. (2012). Learning analytics and educational data mining: towards communication and collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK '12), Simon Buckingham Shum, Dragan Gasevic, and Rebecca Ferguson (Eds.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 252--254. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. US Department of Education (2012) Enhancing Teaching and Learning through Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics: An Issue Brief. Washington, D.C.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Worsley, M. and Blikstein P. (2011). What's an Expert? Using learning analytics to identify emergent markers of expertise through automated speech, sentiment and sketch analysis. In Proceedings for the 4th Annual Conference on Educational Data Mining. Eindhoven, Netherlands.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Worsley, M. (2012). Multimodal Learning Analytics: Enabling the Future of Learning Through Multimodal Data Analysis and Interfaces. 2012 IEEE International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI). Santa Monica, California, USA Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Blikstein, P. (2013). Multimodal Learning Analytics: a research agenda. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Learning Analytics Knowledge Conference (LAK 2013), Leuven, Belgium. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 252--254. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Needleman S. & Wunsch C. (1970). A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. Journal of Molecular BiologyGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Anderson, J. R. & Schunn, C. D. (2000). Implications of the ACT-R Learning Theory: No Magic Bullets in R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 5). Mahwah, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Hoppe, K. D. (1988). Hemispheric specialization and creativity. The Psychiatric Clinics of North America 11, 3, 303--315.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Towards the development of multimodal action based assessment

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        LAK '13: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge
        April 2013
        300 pages
        ISBN:9781450317856
        DOI:10.1145/2460296

        Copyright © 2013 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 8 April 2013

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        LAK '13 Paper Acceptance Rate16of58submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate236of782submissions,30%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader