skip to main content
10.1145/2460296.2460324acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageslakConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Improving retention: predicting at-risk students by analysing clicking behaviour in a virtual learning environment

Published: 08 April 2013 Publication History

Abstract

One of the key interests for learning analytics is how it can be used to improve retention. This paper focuses on work conducted at the Open University (OU) into predicting students who are at risk of failing their module. The Open University is one of the worlds largest distance learning institutions. Since tutors do not interact face to face with students, it can be difficult for tutors to identify and respond to students who are struggling in time to try to resolve the difficulty. Predictive models have been developed and tested using historic Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) activity data combined with other data sources, for three OU modules. This has revealed that it is possible to predict student failure by looking for changes in user's activity in the VLE, when compared against their own previous behaviour, or that of students who can be categorised as having similar learning behaviour. More focused analysis of these modules applying the GUHA (General Unary Hypothesis Automaton) method of data analysis has also yielded some early promising results for creating accurate hypothesis about students who fail.

References

[1]
Arnold, K. E. and Pistilli, M. D. (2012) Course Signals at Purdue: Using Learning Analytics to increase student success. LAK '12, 29 April -- 2 May, Vancouver, Canada
[2]
Campbell, J. P. and Oblinger, D. G. (2007) Academic Analytics. White paper. Educause. http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/pub6101.pdf
[3]
Dekker, G., Pechenizkiy, M. and Vleeshouwers, J. (2009) Predicting Students Drop Out: a Case Study, In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM'09), pp. 41--50
[4]
Diaz, D. P. (2000). Comparison of student characteristics, and evaluation of student success, in an online health education course. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Retrieved from http://academic.cuesta.edu/ltseries/sitepgs/pdf/dissertn.pdf
[5]
Frankola, K. (2002). Why online learners drop out. Crain Communications, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.kfrankola.com/Documents/Why%20online%20learners%20drop%20out_Workforce.pdf
[6]
Fusch, D. (2011) Identifying At-Risk Students: What Data Are You Looking At? Retrieved from http://www.academicimpressions.com/news/identifying-risk-students-what-data-are-you-looking
[7]
Galusha, J. M. (1997). Barriers to learning in distance education. Retrieved from http://www.infrastruction.com/barriers.htm.
[8]
Hájek, P., Havel, I., and Chytil, M. (1966). The GUHA method of automatic hypotheses determination. Computing, 1, 293--308
[9]
Hájek P., Holena and Rauch J. (2010) The GUHA method and its meaning for data mining. J. Computer and System Sciences, 76, 34--48.
[10]
Hammang, J. M., Campbell, J. P., Smith, V. C., Sweeley, D., Ushveridze, A. and Woosley, S. (2010) Predictive Analytics: Building a Crystal Ball for Student Success. Webinar. http://www.uregina.ca/orp/PapersPresentations/SCUP_Webinar_Sept29_2010.pdf
[11]
Mazza, R. and Dimitrova, V. (2004) Visualising Student Tracking Data to Support Instructors in Web-Based Distance Education, 13th International World Wide Web Conference - Alter-nate Educational Track, 154--161.
[12]
Pistilli, M. D. and Arnold, K. E. (2010) Purdue Signals: Mining real-time academic data to enhance student success. About Campus, July-August, 22--24
[13]
Quinlan, J. R. (1993) C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
[14]
Rivera, J. C. and Rice, M. L. (2002). A comparison of student outcomes & satisfaction between traditional & web based course offerings. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration. The State University of West Georgia, 5(3).
[15]
Simpson, O. (2004) The impact on retention of interventions to support distance learning students, Open Learning: The Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 19, 1, 79--95
[16]
Simpson, O. (2008) Motivating learners in open and distance learning: do we need a new theory of learner support? Open Learning: the journal of open and distance learning, 23, 3, 159--170
[17]
Smith, V. C. and Sweeley, D. (2010) Predictive Analytics: Increasing Online Student Engagement and Success. Retrieved from http://www.uregina.ca/orp/PapersPresentations/SCUP_Webinar_Sept29_2010.pdf
[18]
Thompson, M. M. (1998). Distance learners in higher education. In C. C. Gibson (Ed.), Distance learners in higher education (pp. 9--24). Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Transforming Education With Predictive AnalyticsDriving Quality Education Through AI and Data Science10.4018/979-8-3693-8292-9.ch019(433-456)Online publication date: 28-Feb-2025
  • (2024)Empowering Teachers With Generative AI Tools and SupportTransforming Education With Generative AI10.4018/979-8-3693-1351-0.ch011(214-238)Online publication date: 29-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Simplify, Consolidate, Intervene: Facilitating Institutional Support with Mental Models of Learning Management System UseProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36870518:CSCW2(1-23)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Improving retention: predicting at-risk students by analysing clicking behaviour in a virtual learning environment

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      LAK '13: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge
      April 2013
      300 pages
      ISBN:9781450317856
      DOI:10.1145/2460296
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 08 April 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. distance learning
      2. predictive modelling
      3. retention
      4. student data
      5. virtual learning environment

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Funding Sources

      Conference

      LAK '13
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      LAK '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 16 of 58 submissions, 28%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 236 of 782 submissions, 30%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)49
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
      Reflects downloads up to 28 Feb 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2025)Transforming Education With Predictive AnalyticsDriving Quality Education Through AI and Data Science10.4018/979-8-3693-8292-9.ch019(433-456)Online publication date: 28-Feb-2025
      • (2024)Empowering Teachers With Generative AI Tools and SupportTransforming Education With Generative AI10.4018/979-8-3693-1351-0.ch011(214-238)Online publication date: 29-Mar-2024
      • (2024)Simplify, Consolidate, Intervene: Facilitating Institutional Support with Mental Models of Learning Management System UseProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36870518:CSCW2(1-23)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
      • (2024)Prototyping an Adaptive Learning Platform's Learning Analytic Dashboards on Behavioral Data to Support Teachers' Pedagogical Actions2024 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication, Electrical, and Smart Systems (iCACCESS)10.1109/iCACCESS61735.2024.10499493(1-6)Online publication date: 8-Mar-2024
      • (2024)Learning Environment Interoperability in Software Engineering Education2024 36th International Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T)10.1109/CSEET62301.2024.10663056(1-5)Online publication date: 29-Jul-2024
      • (2024)What distance learning students want from an AI Digital AssistantDistance Education10.1080/01587919.2024.2338717(1-17)Online publication date: 28-May-2024
      • (2024)Die Ethik der KI in Universitäten: Im Spannungsfeld zwischen Qualität, Identität und PrivatsphäreVertrauen in Künstliche Intelligenz10.1007/978-3-658-43816-6_7(117-135)Online publication date: 19-Sep-2024
      • (2023)20 years of interactive tasks in large‐scale assessments: Process data as a way towards sustainable change?Journal of Computer Assisted Learning10.1111/jcal.1284739:6(1852-1859)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2023
      • (2023)Learning Analytics to Support Education for All: Learning from the Past2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE58773.2023.10343491(1-8)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2023
      • (2023)The Role of Machine Learning in Identifying Students At-Risk and Minimizing FailureIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2022.323298411(1224-1243)Online publication date: 2023
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media