Robert Clarke
ABSTRACT
The process of contract cheating, the form of academic dishonesty where students outsource the creation of work on their behalf, has been recognised as a serious threat to the quality of academic awards. Unlike student plagiarism, this cheating behaviour is not currently detectable using automated tools.
This paper analyses the monetary value of contract cheating to the different parties who play a role in the contract cheating process. The main analysis is based on a corpus consisting of 14,438 identified attempts to cheat. The corpus was collected between March 2005 and July 2012. The corpus was formed as part of a manual contract cheating detection process identifying students using online agencies. These online agencies are web sites which enable students to contract cheat. The agencies usually benefit from this by receiving a percentage cut of the money raised from the contract cheating that they facilitate. This corpus is used as the basis of an attempt to quantify the monetary value of contract cheating to online agencies.
Other parties exist who benefit from the contract cheating process. The paper identifies several such parties and gives examples of the monetary value of contract cheating to each of them. Most notably this includes the contractors who bid for the opportunity to produce work on behalf of the students. Further, the paper identifies the role of intermediary contractors. These are people who post assignment requests on agency sites but who are not themselves students. These intermediary contractors appear to benefit by first receiving requests to complete work for students and then re-outsourcing this work at a much lower cost than they were paid. The group of frequent workers, that is people who regularly work on student assignments and hence benefit financially, is also identified.
The paper concludes by presenting the changing trends in contract cheating that the authors have observed since they started working against this form of academic misconduct in 2005. Finally, recommendations for academics towards dealing with the issues posed by contract cheating are provided.
- About Freelancer.com. 2013. freelancer.com/info/about.php.Google Scholar
- Chakrabarti, R. 2012. When Essays For Sale Become Contract Cheating. BBC News. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-20298237.Google Scholar
- Clarke, R. and Lancaster, T. 2006. Eliminating The Successor To Plagiarism? Identifying The Usage Of Contract Cheating Sites In Proceedings Of 2nd Plagiarism: Prevention, Practice and Policy Conference 2006, Newcastle, UK, June 2006.Google Scholar
- Clarke, R, and Lancaster, T. 2007. Establishing a Systematic Six-Stage Process for Detecting Contract Cheating In Proceedings Of The Second International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Applications (ICPCA07), Birmingham, United Kingdom, July 2007.Google Scholar
- Culwin F. and Lancaster T. 2001. Plagiarism Issues for Higher Education. Vine, 31, 2, 36--41. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03055720010804005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- EssayBay. Term Papers And Custom Essays | The World's Only Marketplace For Custom Written Papers. 2013. http://essaybay.com.Google Scholar
- Freelancer.com -- Hire Freelancers & Find Freelance Jobs Online. 2013. http://freelancer.com.Google Scholar
- GetACoder -- Quick & Easy Job Outsourcing. Outsource Your Job Today. 2013. http://getacoder.com.Google Scholar
- Lancaster, T. and Clarke, R. 2007. Assessing Contract Cheating Through Auction Sites -- A Computing Perspective In Proceedings Of 8th Annual Higher Education Academy Conference in Information and Computer Sciences, Southampton, United Kingdom, August 2007.Google Scholar
- Kasamba. Trusted Psychics At Your Fingertips. 2013. http://kasamba.com.Google Scholar
- Lancaster, T. and Clarke, R. 2007. The Phenomena of Contract Cheating. In Student Plagiarism in an Online World: Problems And Solutions. Roberts, T., Ed. Idea Group Inc., Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA, 144--159. doi: 10.4018/978-1-59904-801-7.ch010.Google Scholar
- Lancaster, T. and Clarke, R. 2010. Staff-Led Individualised Assessment -- A Case Study. In Proceedings Of 11th Annual Higher Education Academy Conference in Information and Computer Sciences. Durham, United Kingdom, August 2010.Google Scholar
- Lancaster, T. and Clarke, R. 2012. Dealing With Contract Cheating: A Question Of Attribution. In Proceedings Of 1st Annual Higher Education Academy Conference in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics. London, United Kingdom, April 2012.Google Scholar
- Lancaster, T. and Culwin F. 2007. Preserving Academic Integrity -- Fighting Against Non-Originality Agencies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 1 (Jan 2007), 153--157. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00491.x.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lightfoot, L. 2009. Cheating Is A Growing Problem Facing Academia. The Independent, 15 January 2009.Google Scholar
- LivePerson. Expert Advice Online By LivePerson. 2013. http://liveperson.com/experts.Google Scholar
- O'Malley, M. and Roberts, T. 2011. Plagiarism In Science Education: Preventing Cheating Via Online Auctions. In Proceedings Of The Australian Conference on Science and Mathematics Education, Sydney, Australia, August 2011.Google Scholar
- RentACoder. Freelancer Acquires vWorker. 2013. http://freelancer.com.Google Scholar
- ScriptLance. Freelancer.com -- Hire Freelancers & Find Freelance Jobs Online. 2013. http://scriptlance.com.Google Scholar
- StudentOfFortune. Homework Help, Online Tutoring In Math, Science, Physics, Chemistry From StudentOfFortune.com. 2013. http://studentoffortune.com.Google Scholar
- Transtutors. Online Tutoring, Homework Help, Assignment Help -- Transtutors.com. 2013. http://transtutors.com.Google Scholar
- TurnItIn : Leading Plagiarism Checker, Online Grading And Peer Review. 2013. http://turnitin.com.Google Scholar
- vWorker. Freelancer Acquires vWorker. 2013. http://vworker.comGoogle Scholar
Index Terms
- Commercial aspects of contract cheating
Recommendations
Jack Watson: Addressing Contract Cheating at Scale in Online Computer Science Education
L@S '19: Proceedings of the Sixth (2019) ACM Conference on Learning @ ScaleCheating has always been a problem for academic institutions, but the internet has increased access to a form of academic dishonesty known as contract cheating, or "homework for hire." When students purchase work online and submit it as their own, it ...
Detecting Contract Cheaters in Online Programming Classes with Keystroke Dynamics
L@S '20: Proceedings of the Seventh ACM Conference on Learning @ ScaleIn online programming classes, it is tricky to uphold academic honesty in the assessment process. A common approach, plagiarism detection, is not accurate for novice programmers and ineffective for detecting contract cheaters. We present a new approach, ...
An Observational Analysis of the Range and Extent of Contract Cheating from Online Courses Found on Agency Websites
CISIS '14: Proceedings of the 2014 Eighth International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive SystemsAlthough online courses can provide access to higher education through e-learning systems which would not otherwise be available for students, they also pose challenges for academic integrity. Paramount to this is contract cheating, where students have ...
Comments