skip to main content
10.1145/2463372.2463396acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Right on the MONEE: combining task- and environment-driven evolution

Published: 06 July 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Evolution can be employed for two goals. Firstly, to provide a force for adaptation to the environment as it does in nature and in many artificial life implementations - this allows the evolving population to survive. Secondly, evolution can provide a force for optimisation as is mostly seen in evolutionary robotics research - this causes the robots to do something useful. We propose the MONEE algorithmic framework as an approach to combine these two facets of evolution: to combine environment-driven and task-driven evolution. To achieve this, MONEE employs environment-driven and task-based parent selection schemes in parallel.
We test this approach in a simulated experimental setting where the robots are tasked to collect two different kinds of puck. MONEE allows the robots to adapt their behaviour to successfully tackle these tasks while ensuring an equitable task distribution at no cost in task performance through a market-based mechanism. In environments that discourage robots performing multiple tasks and in environments where one task is easier than the other, MONEE's market mechanism prevents the population completely focussing on one task.

References

[1]
H.-G. Beyer and H.-P. Schwefel. Evolution strategies -- A comprehensive introduction. Natural Computing, 1:3--52, 2002.
[2]
R. Bianco and S. Nolfi. Toward open-ended evolutionary robotics: evolving elementary robotic units able to self-assemble and self-reproduce. Connection Science, 4:227--248, 2004.
[3]
N. Bredeche, J.-M. Montanier, W. Liu, and A. F. Winfield. Environment-driven distributed evolutionary adaptation in a population of autonomous robotic agents. Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems, 18(1):101--129, 2012.
[4]
N. Bredeche, J.-M. Montanier, B. Weel, and E. Haasdijk. Roborobo! a fast robot simulator for swarm and collective robotics. CoRR, 2013.
[5]
M. Burtsev, V. Red'ko, and R. Gusarev. Model of evolutionary emergence of purposeful adaptive behavior. the role of motivation. In J. Kelemen and P. Sosík, editors, ECAL, volume 2159 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 413--416. Springer, 2001.
[6]
M. Dorigo, D. Floreano, L. M. Gambardella, F. Mondada, S. Nolfi, T. Baaboura, M. Birattari, M. Bonani, M. Brambilla, A. Brutschy, D. Burnier, A. Campo, A. Christensen, A. Decugnière, G. Di Caro, F. Ducatelle, E. Ferrante, A. Förster, J. Guzzi, V. Longchamp, S. Magnenat, J. Martinez Gonzales, N. Mathews, M. Montes de Oca, R. O'Grady, C. Pinciroli, G. Pini, P. Rétornaz, J. Roberts, V. Sperati, T. Stirling, A. Stranieri, T. Stützle, V. Trianni, E. Tuci, A. E. Turgut, and F. Vaussard. Swarmanoid: a novel concept for the study of heterogeneous robotic swarms. IEEE J. Robot. Autom., page in press, 2012.
[7]
C. Jones and M. Mataric. Adaptive division of labor in large-scale minimalist multi-robot systems. In Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2003. (IROS 2003). Proceedings. 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on, volume 2, pages 1969 -- 1974, Oct. 2003.
[8]
H. Kurokawa, E. Yoshida, K. Tomita, A. Kamimura, S. Murata, and S. Kokaji. Self-reconfigurable m-tran structures and walker generation. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 54(2):142--149, 2006.
[9]
J. Lehman and K. Stanley. Abandoning objectives: Evolution through the search for novelty alone. Evolutionary computation, 19(2):189--223, 2011.
[10]
S. Mascaro, K. Korb, and A. Nicholson. An alife investigation on the origins of dimorphic parental investments. In H. A. Abbass, T. Bossomaier, and J. Wiles, editors, Advances in Natural Computation, Proceedings of the Australian Conference on Artificial Life (ACAL 2005), volume 3, pages 171--185, 2005.
[11]
F. Menczer and R. Belew. Latent energy environments. In Santa Fe Institute Studies In The Sciences Of Complexity-Proceedings Volume-, volume 26, pages 191--210, 1996.
[12]
F. Menczer, W. Willuhn, and R. Belew. An endogenous fitness paradigm for adaptive information agents. In CIKM Workshop on Intelligent Information Agents. Citeseer, 1994.
[13]
J.-B. Mouret and S. Doncieux. Encouraging behavioral diversity in evolutionary robotics: an empirical study. Evolutionary Computation, 20(1):91--133, 2012.
[14]
Q. Nguyen, X. Nguyen, M. O'Neill, and A. Agapitos. An investigation of fitness sharing with semantic and syntactic distance metrics. In A. Moraglio, S. Silva, K. Krawiec, P. Machado, and C. Cotta, editors, Genetic Programming, volume 7244 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 109--120. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012.
[15]
S. Nolfi and D. Floreano. Evolutionary Robotics: The Biology, Intelligence, and Technology of Self-Organizing Machines. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000.
[16]
S. Rasmussen, C. Knudsen, R. Feldberg, and M. Hindsholm. The coreworld: Emergence and evolution of cooperative structures in a computational chemistry. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 42(1):111--134, 1990.
[17]
T. S. Ray. Is it alive or is it GA. In R. K. Belew and L. B. Booker, editors, Fourth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, pages 527--534, 1991.
[18]
M. Scheutz and P. Schermerhorn. Predicting population dynamics and evolutionary trajectories based on performance evaluations in alife simulations. In H.-G. Beyer and U.-M. O'Reilly, editors, Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO-2005), pages 35--42. ACM, ACM, 2005.
[19]
C. Schwarzer, C. Hösler, and N. Michiels. Artificial sexuality and reproduction of robot organisms. In P. Levi and S. Kernbach, editors, Symbiotic Multi-Robot Organisms: Reliability, Adaptability, Evolution, pages 384--403. Springer-Verlag, Berlin--Heidelberg--New York, May 2010.
[20]
F. Tang and L. Parker. A complete methodology for generating multi-robot task solutions using asymtre-d and market-based task allocation. In Robotics and Automation, 2007 IEEE International Conference on, pages 3351 --3358, Apr. 2007.
[21]
V. Trianni. Evolutionary Swarm Robotics -- Evolving Self-Organising Behaviours in Groups of Autonomous Robots, volume 108 of Studies in Computational Intelligence. Springer-Verlag, Berlin--Heidelberg--New York, 2008.
[22]
J. Ventrella. Genepool: Exploring the interaction between natural selection and sexual selection. Artificial Life Models in Software, pages 81--96, 2005.
[23]
W. Walsh and M. Wellman. A market protocol for decentralized task allocation. In Multi Agent Systems, 1998. Proceedings. International Conference on, pages 325 --332, July 1998.
[24]
R. A. Watson, S. G. Ficici, and J. B. Pollack. Embodied evolution: Distributing an evolutionary algorithm in a population of robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 39(1):1--18, Apr. 2002.
[25]
S. Wischmann, K. Stamm, and F. Wörgötter. Embodied evolution and learning: The neglected timing of maturation. In F. Almeida e Costa, editor, Advances in Artificial Life: 9th European Conference on Artificial Life, volume 4648 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 284--293. Springer-Verlag, Lisbon, Portugal, September 10--14 2007.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Resilient swarm behaviors via online evolution and behavior fusionSwarm Intelligence10.1007/s11721-024-00243-wOnline publication date: 17-Aug-2024
  • (2017)An investigation of environmental influence on the benefits of adaptation mechanisms in evolutionary swarm roboticsProceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference10.1145/3071178.3071232(155-162)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2017
  • (2017)Evolving robot swarm behaviors by minimizing surpriseProceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion10.1145/3067695.3082548(1679-1680)Online publication date: 15-Jul-2017
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Right on the MONEE: combining task- and environment-driven evolution

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    GECCO '13: Proceedings of the 15th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
    July 2013
    1672 pages
    ISBN:9781450319638
    DOI:10.1145/2463372
    • Editor:
    • Christian Blum,
    • General Chair:
    • Enrique Alba
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 06 July 2013

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. embodied evolution
    2. evolutionary swarm robotics
    3. multi-objective optimization
    4. on-line evolution
    5. open-ended evolution
    6. task distribution

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    GECCO '13
    Sponsor:
    GECCO '13: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
    July 6 - 10, 2013
    Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Acceptance Rates

    GECCO '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 204 of 570 submissions, 36%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,669 of 4,410 submissions, 38%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 02 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Resilient swarm behaviors via online evolution and behavior fusionSwarm Intelligence10.1007/s11721-024-00243-wOnline publication date: 17-Aug-2024
    • (2017)An investigation of environmental influence on the benefits of adaptation mechanisms in evolutionary swarm roboticsProceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference10.1145/3071178.3071232(155-162)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2017
    • (2017)Evolving robot swarm behaviors by minimizing surpriseProceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion10.1145/3067695.3082548(1679-1680)Online publication date: 15-Jul-2017
    • (2016)Assessing the effect of self-assembly ports in evolutionary swarm robotics2016 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI)10.1109/SSCI.2016.7850181(1-8)Online publication date: Dec-2016
    • (2016)Understanding Environmental Influence in an Open-Ended Evolutionary AlgorithmParallel Problem Solving from Nature – PPSN XIV10.1007/978-3-319-45823-6_86(921-931)Online publication date: 31-Aug-2016
    • (2015)Improving Survivability in Environment-driven Distributed Evolutionary Algorithms through Explicit Relative Fitness and Fitness Proportionate CommunicationProceedings of the 2015 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation10.1145/2739480.2754688(169-176)Online publication date: 11-Jul-2015
    • (2014)Beyond black-box optimization: a review of selective pressures for evolutionary roboticsEvolutionary Intelligence10.1007/s12065-014-0110-x7:2(71-93)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2014
    • (2014)In Vivo Veritas: Towards the Evolution of ThingsParallel Problem Solving from Nature – PPSN XIII10.1007/978-3-319-10762-2_3(24-39)Online publication date: 2014

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media