skip to main content
10.1145/2463372.2463418acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Effects of discrete hill climbing on model building forestimation of distribution algorithms

Published: 06 July 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Hybridization of global and local searches is a well-known technique for optimization algorithms. Hill climbing is one of the local search methods. On estimation of distribution algorithms (EDAs), hill climbing strengthens the signals of dependencies on correlated variables and improves the quality of model building, which reduces the required population size and convergence time. However, hill climbing also consumes extra computational time. In this paper, analytical models are developed to investigate the effects of combining two different hill climbers with the extended compact genetic algorithm and the dependency structure matrix genetic algorithm. By using the one-max problem and the 5-bit non-overlapping trap problem as the test problems, the performances of different hill climbers are compared. Both analytical models and experiments reveal that the greedy hill climber reduces the number of function evaluations for EDAs to find the global optimum.

References

[1]
D. H. Ackley. An empirical study of bit vector function optimization. Genetic Algorithms ans Simulated Annealing, pages 170--204, 1987.
[2]
U. Aickelin, E. K. Burke, and J. Li. An estimation of distribution algorithm with intelligent local search for rule-based nurse rostering. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58(12):1574--1585, 2007.
[3]
T. Blickle and L. Thiele. A mathematical analysis of tournament selection. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms (ICGA'95), pages 9--16, 1995.
[4]
P. A. Bosman and D. Thierens. The roles of local search, model building and optimal mixing in evolutionary algorithms from a bbo perspective. Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO-2011), pages 663--670, 2011.
[5]
K. Deb and D. E. Goldberg. Sufficient conditions for deceptive and easy binary functions. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 10(4):385--408, 1993.
[6]
D. E. Goldberg. The design of innovation: Lessons from and for competent genetic algorithms. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, 2002.
[7]
D. E. Goldberg, K. Deb, and J. H. Clark. Genetic algorithms, noise, and the sizing of populations. Complex Systems, 6:333--362, 1992.
[8]
D. E. Goldberg, K. Sastry, and T. Latoza. On the supply of building blocks. Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO-2001), pages 336--342, 2001.
[9]
D. E. Goldberg and S. Voessner. Optimizing global-local search hybrids. Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO-1999), pages 220--228, 1999.
[10]
G. Harik, E. Cantú-Paz, D. E. Goldberg, and B. L. Miller. The gambler's ruin problem, genetic algorithms, and the sizing of populations. Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, pages 7--12, 1997.
[11]
G. R. Harik. Finding multimodal solutions using restricted tournament selection. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, pages 24--31, 1995.
[12]
G. R. Harik, F. G. Lobo, and K. Sastry. Linkage learning via probabilistic modeling in the extended compact genetic algorithm (ECGA). In Scalable Optimization via Probabilistic Modeling, chapter 3, pages 39--61. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, 2006.
[13]
W. E. Hart. Adaptive global optimization with local search. PhD thesis, La Jolla, CA, USA, 1994. UMI Order No. GAX94--32928.
[14]
M. Hutter and M. Zaffalon. Distribution of mutual information from complete and incomplete data. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 48(3):633--657, 2005.
[15]
D. Icl\uanzan and D. Dumitrescu. Overcoming hierarchical difficulty by hill-climbing the building block structure. Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO-2007), pages 1380--1387, 2007.
[16]
C. F. Lima, M. Pelikan, F. G. Lobo, and D. E. Goldberg. Loopy substructural local search for the bayesian optimization algorithm. Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Engineering Stochastic Local Search Algorithms. Designing, Implementing and Analyzing Effective Heuristics (SLS '09), pages 61--75, 2009.
[17]
P. Moscato. On evolution, search, optimization, genetic algorithms and martial arts: Towards memetic algorithms. Technical Report C3P Report 826, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 1989.
[18]
M. Pelikan, E. Cantú-Paz, and D. E. Goldberg. Bayesian optimization algorithm, population sizing, and time to convergence. Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO-2000), pages 275--282, 2000.
[19]
M. Pelikan and D. E. Goldberg. Hierarchical BOA solves Ising spin glasses and MAXSAT. Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO-2003), pages 1271--1282, 2003.
[20]
M. Pelikan, K. Sastry, D. E. Goldberg, M. V. Butz, and M. Hauschild. Performance of evolutionary algorithms on nk landscapes with nearest neighbor interactions and tunable overlap. Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO-2009), pages 851--858, 2009.
[21]
E. Radetic, M. Pelikan, and D. E. Goldberg. Effects of a deterministic hill climber on hboa. Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO-2009), pages 437--444, 2009.
[22]
K. Sastry. Evaluation-relaxation schemes for genetic and evolutionary algorithms. Master thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 2002.
[23]
K. Sastry and D. E. Goldberg. Let's get ready to rumble: Crossover versus mutation head to head. Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO-2004), pages 126--137, 2004.
[24]
K. Sastry and D. E. Goldberg. Let's get ready to rumble redux: crossover versus mutation head to head on exponentially scaled problems. Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO-2007), pages 1380--1387, 2007.
[25]
C. E. Shannon. A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27:379--423, 1948.
[26]
D. Sherrington and S. Kirkpatrick. Solvable model of a spin-glass. Phys. Rev. Lett., 35:1792--1796, 1975.
[27]
A. Sinha and D. E. Goldberg. Verification and extension of the theory of global-local hybrids. Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO-2001), pages 591--597, 2001.
[28]
D. Thierens and D. E. Goldberg. Convergence models of genetic algorithm selection schemes. Parallel Problem Solving fron Nature (PPSN III), pages 119--129, 1994.
[29]
S. Tsutsui, M. Pelikan, and A. Ghosh. Edge histogram based sampling with local search for solving permutation problems. International Journal of Hybrid Intelligent Systems, 3(1):11--22, 2006.
[30]
T.-L. Yu, D. E. Goldberg, A. Yassine, and Y.-p. Chen. Genetic algorithm design inspired by organizational theory: Pilot study of a dependency structure matrix driven genetic algorithm. Proceedings of Artificial Neural Networks in Engineering (ANNIE 2003), pages 327--332, 2003.
[31]
T.-L. Yu, K. Sastry, D. E. Goldberg, and M. Pelikan. Population sizing for entropy-based model building in discrete estimation of distribution algorithms. Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO-2007), pages 601--608, 2007.
[32]
Q. Zhang, J. Sun, E. Tsang, and J. Ford. Estimation of distribution algorithm with 2-opt local search for the quadratic assignment problem. Towards a New Evolutionary Computation, 192:281--292, 2006.

Cited By

View all
  • (2017)A diversity preservation scheme for DSMGA-II to conquer the hierarchical difficultyProceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference10.1145/3071178.3071253(841-848)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2017
  • (2015)Optimization by Pairwise Linkage Detection, Incremental Linkage Set, and Restricted / Back MixingProceedings of the 2015 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation10.1145/2739480.2754737(519-526)Online publication date: 11-Jul-2015
  • (2014)Multimodality and the linkage-learning difficulty of additively separable functionsProceedings of the 2014 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation10.1145/2576768.2598281(365-372)Online publication date: 12-Jul-2014

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
GECCO '13: Proceedings of the 15th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
July 2013
1672 pages
ISBN:9781450319638
DOI:10.1145/2463372
  • Editor:
  • Christian Blum,
  • General Chair:
  • Enrique Alba
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 06 July 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. genetic algorithms
  2. local search
  3. performance measures
  4. theory

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

GECCO '13
Sponsor:
GECCO '13: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
July 6 - 10, 2013
Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Acceptance Rates

GECCO '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 204 of 570 submissions, 36%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,669 of 4,410 submissions, 38%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 28 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2017)A diversity preservation scheme for DSMGA-II to conquer the hierarchical difficultyProceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference10.1145/3071178.3071253(841-848)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2017
  • (2015)Optimization by Pairwise Linkage Detection, Incremental Linkage Set, and Restricted / Back MixingProceedings of the 2015 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation10.1145/2739480.2754737(519-526)Online publication date: 11-Jul-2015
  • (2014)Multimodality and the linkage-learning difficulty of additively separable functionsProceedings of the 2014 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation10.1145/2576768.2598281(365-372)Online publication date: 12-Jul-2014

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media