skip to main content
10.1145/2463372.2463419acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Design of test problems for discrete estimation of distribution algorithms

Published: 06 July 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Two types of problem structures, overlapping and conflict structures, are challenging for the estimation of distribution algorithms (EDAs) to solve. To test the capabilities of different EDAs of dealing with overlapping and conflict structures, some test problems have been proposed. However, the upper-bound of the degree of overlap and the effect of conflict have not been fully investigated. This paper investigates how to properly define the degree of overlap and the degree of conflict to reflect the difficulties of problems for the EDAs. A new test problem is proposed with the new definitions of the degree of overlap and the degree of conflict. A framework for building the proposed problem is presented, and some model-building genetic algorithms are tested by the problem. This test problem can be applied to further researches on overlapping and conflict structures.

References

[1]
F. Barahona. On the computational complexity of ising spin glass models. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, pages 3241--3253, 1982.
[2]
J.-H. Chang, C.-H. Hsueh, H. Lee, T.-L. Yu, and T.-Y. Ho. A test function with full controllability over overlapping and confliction between sub-problems. TEIL Report No. 2011003, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, July 2011.
[3]
W.-M. Chen, C.-Y. Shao, P.-C. Hsu, and T.-L. Yu. A test problem with adjustable degrees of overlap and conflict among subproblems. Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO-2012), 2012.
[4]
H. Chernoff. A measure of asymptotic efficiency for tests of a hypothesis based on the sum of observations. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 23:493--507, 1952.
[5]
K. Deb and D. E. Goldberg. Analyzing deception in trap functions. Foundations of Genetic Algorithms 2, pages 93--108, 1993.
[6]
G. R. Harik. Finding multimodal solutions using restricted tournament selection. In ICGA, pages 24--31, 1995.
[7]
G. R. Harik, F. G. Lobo, and K. Sastry. Linkage learning via probabilistic modeling in the extended compact genetic algorithm (ECGA). In Scalable Optimization via Probabilistic Modeling, chapter 3, pages 39--61. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, 2006.
[8]
H. Lee and T.-L. Yu. Off-line building block identification: Detecting building blocks directly from fitness without genetic algorithms. Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO-2012), pages 641--648, 2012.
[9]
M. Pelikan and D. E. Goldberg. Escaping hierarchical traps with competent genetic algorithms. Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO-2001), pages 511--518, 2001.
[10]
M. Pelikan and D. E. Goldberg. Hierarchical BOA solves Ising spin glasses and MAXSAT. Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO-2003), pages 1271--1282, 2003.
[11]
M. Pelikan, K. Sastry, D. E. Goldberg, M. V. Butz, and M. Hauschild. Performance of evolutionary algorithms on NK landscapes with nearest neighbor interactions and tunable overlap. Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO-2009), pages 851--858, 2009.
[12]
K. Sastry. Evaluation-relaxation schemes for genetic and evolutionary algorithms. Master thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 2002.
[13]
M. Tsuji, M. Munetomo, and K. Akama. A crossover for complex building blocks overlapping. Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO-2006), pages 1337--1344, 2006.
[14]
T.-L. Yu and D. E. Goldberg. Quality and efficiency of model building for genetic algorithms. Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO-2004), pages 367--378, 2004.
[15]
T.-L. Yu, D. E. Goldberg, K. Sastry, C. F. Lima, and M. Pelikan. Dependency structure matrix, genetic algorithms, and effective recombination. Evolutionary Computation, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 595--626, 2009.
[16]
T.-L. Yu, D. E. Goldberg, A. Yassine, and Y.-p. Chen. Genetic algorithm design inspired by organizational theory: Pilot study of a dependency structure matrix driven genetic algorithm. Proceedings of Artificial Neural Networks in Engineering (ANNIE-2003), pages 327--332, 2003.
[17]
T.-L. Yu, K. Sastry, and D. E. Goldberg. Linkage learning, overlapping building blocks, and systematic strategy for scalable recombination. Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO-2005), pages 1217--1224, 2005.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Deep Optimisation: Multi-scale Evolution by Inducing and Searching in Deep RepresentationsApplications of Evolutionary Computation10.1007/978-3-030-72699-7_32(506-521)Online publication date: 7-Apr-2021

Index Terms

  1. Design of test problems for discrete estimation of distribution algorithms

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    GECCO '13: Proceedings of the 15th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
    July 2013
    1672 pages
    ISBN:9781450319638
    DOI:10.1145/2463372
    • Editor:
    • Christian Blum,
    • General Chair:
    • Enrique Alba
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 06 July 2013

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. building blocks
    2. genetic algorithms
    3. non-separable problems
    4. performance measures

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    GECCO '13
    Sponsor:
    GECCO '13: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
    July 6 - 10, 2013
    Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Acceptance Rates

    GECCO '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 204 of 570 submissions, 36%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,669 of 4,410 submissions, 38%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 28 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2021)Deep Optimisation: Multi-scale Evolution by Inducing and Searching in Deep RepresentationsApplications of Evolutionary Computation10.1007/978-3-030-72699-7_32(506-521)Online publication date: 7-Apr-2021

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media