skip to main content
10.1145/2463372.2463527acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Hybrid POMDP based evolutionary adaptive framework for efficient visual tracking algorithms

Published: 06 July 2013 Publication History

Abstract

This paper presents an evolutionary and adaptive framework for efficient visual tracking based on a hybrid POMDP formulation. The main focus is to guarantee visual tracking performance under varying environments without strongly-controlled situations or high-cost devices. The performance optimization is formulated as a dynamic adaptation of the system control parameters, i.e., threshold and adjusting parameters in a visual tracking algorithm, based on the hybrid of offline and online POMDPs. The hybrid POMDP allows the agent to construct world-belief models under uncertain environments in offline, and focus on the optimization of the system control parameters over the current world model in real-time. Since the visual tracking should satisfy strict real-time constraints, we restrict our attention to simpler and faster approaches instead of exploring the belief space of each world model directly. The hybrid POMDP is thus solved by an evolutionary adaptive framework employing the GA (Genetic Algorithm) and real-time Q-learning approaches in the optimally reachable genotype and phenotype spaces, respectively. Experiments were carried out extensively in the area of eye tracking using videos of various structures and qualities, and yielded very encouraging results. The framework can achieve an optimal performance by balancing the tracking accuracy and real-time constraints.

References

[1]
Yilmaz, O. Javed, and M. Shah, "Object tracking: A survey," ACM Computing Surveys, Vol. 38, No. 4, 2006.
[2]
B.Leibe, et. al., "Coupled object detection and tracking from static cameras and moving vehicles," IEEE Trans. PAMI, 2008, 30, (10), pp. 1683--1698.
[3]
X. Liu, et.al., "Adaptive Object Tracking by Learning Hybrid Template Online," IEEE Trans. on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, Vol. 21, No. 11, Nov. 2011, pp.1588--1598.
[4]
Z. Kadal, et.al., "Tracking-Learning-Detection," IEEE Trans on PAMI, Vol. 34, No. 7, July 2012, pp. 1409--1422.
[5]
R. S. Sutton and A. G. Barto, Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998.
[6]
S. Ross, et.al., "Online Planning Algorithms for POMDPs," Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 32, 2008, pp. 663--704.
[7]
A. Barto, et.al., "Learning to act using real-time dynamic programming," AIJ, Vol. 72, 1995, pp. 81--138.
[8]
S. Ross and B. Chaib-draa et.al., "Aems: An anytime online search algorithm for approximate policy refinement in large POMDPs," In Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-07), 2007, pp. 2592--2598.
[9]
S. Paquet, et.al., "Hybrid POMDP algorithms," Proceedings of The Workshop on Multi-Agent Sequential Decision Making in Uncertain Domains, 2006.
[10]
S. Ross, et.al., "Theoretical analysis of heuristic search methods for online POMDPs," Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2008.
[11]
T. Wang, et.al., "Bayesian sparse sampling for on-line reward optimization," Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on Machine Learning, 2005, pp. 956--963.
[12]
F. Doshi-Velez, et.al., "Reinforcement learning with limited reinforcement: Using Bayes risk for active learning in POMDPs," Artificial Intelligence, 2012, pp.187--188.
[13]
M. Strens, "A Bayesian framework for reinforcement learning," International Conference in Machine Learning, 2000.
[14]
F. Doshi-Velez, "The infinite partially observable Markov decision process," Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 22, 2009, pp. 477--485.
[15]
P. Poupart and N. Vlassis, "Model-based Bayesian reinforcement learning in partially observable domains," ISAIM, 2008.
[16]
C. Wolf and J.-M. Jolion, "Object count/area graphs for the evaluation of object detection and segmentation algorithms," International Journal of Document Analysis (2006) 8(4): 280--296.
[17]
Y. Shen, et.al., "Evolutionary Adaptive Eye Tracking for Low-cost HCI Applications," Submitted to JEI.
[18]
H. Sellahewa and S. A. Jassim, "Image-Quality-Based Adaptive Face Recognition," IEEE Trans. on Instrumentation and Measurement, Vol. 59, No. 4, April 2010, pp. 805--813.
[19]
Q. Li and Z. Wang, "Reduced-Reference Image Quality Assessment Using Divisive Normalization-Based Image Representation," IEEE Journal of Selected Topic in Signal Processing, Vol. 3, No. 2, Apr. 2009, pp. 202--211.

Index Terms

  1. Hybrid POMDP based evolutionary adaptive framework for efficient visual tracking algorithms

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      GECCO '13: Proceedings of the 15th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
      July 2013
      1672 pages
      ISBN:9781450319638
      DOI:10.1145/2463372
      • Editor:
      • Christian Blum,
      • General Chair:
      • Enrique Alba
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 06 July 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. ga
      2. genotype
      3. phenotype
      4. real-time q-learning
      5. visual tracking

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      GECCO '13
      Sponsor:
      GECCO '13: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
      July 6 - 10, 2013
      Amsterdam, The Netherlands

      Acceptance Rates

      GECCO '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 204 of 570 submissions, 36%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 1,669 of 4,410 submissions, 38%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 142
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 25 Feb 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media