skip to main content
10.1145/2463372.2463539acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Vehicular mobility model optimization using cooperative coevolutionary genetic algorithms

Published:06 July 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

A key factor for accurate vehicular ad hoc networks (VANET) simulation is the quality of its underlying mobility model. VehILux is a recent vehicular mobility model that generates traces using traffic volume counts and real-world map data. This model uses probabilistic attraction points which values require optimization to provide realistic traces. Previous sensitivity analysis and application of genetic algorithms (GAs) on the Luxembourg problem instance have outlined this model's limitations. In this article, we first propose an extension of the model using a higher number of auto-generated attraction points. Then its decomposition on the Luxembourg instance using geographical information is proposed as a way to break epistatic links and hence make its optimization using cooperative coevolutionary genetic algorithms (CCGAs) more efficient. Experimental results demonstrate the significant realism increase brought by both the VehILux model enhancements and the CCGA compared to the generational and cellular GAs.

References

  1. The cabspotting project, {online}. http://cabspotting.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. OpenStreetMap project, {online}. http://www.openstreetmap.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Traffic volume counts in Luxembourg, Luxembourg ministry of transportation, {online}. http://www.pch.public.lu/trafic/comptage/index.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. E. Alba and B. Dorronsoro. Cellular Genetic Algorithms. Operations Research/Compuer Science Interfaces. Springer-Verlag Heidelberg, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. Behrisch, L. Bieker, J. Erdmann, and D. Krajzewicz. SUMO - Simulation of Urban MObility: An Overview. In Proc. 3rd International Conference on Advances in System Simulation, SIMUL, pages 63--68, Spain, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. T. Camp, J. Boleng, and V. Davies. A survey of mobility models for ad hoc network research. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2(5):483--502, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. C. Gawron. An iterative algorithm to determine the dynamic user equilibrium in a traffic simulation model. International Journal of Modern Physics C, 9(3):393--407, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. A. Grzybek, G. Danoy, and P. Bouvry. Generation of realistic traces for vehicular mobility simulations. In Proceedings of the second ACM international symposium on Design and analysis of intelligent vehicular networks and applications, DIVANet '12, pages 131--138, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. V. Naumov, R. Baumann, and T. Gross. An evaluation of inter-vehicle ad hoc networks based on realistic vehicular traces. In 7th ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking and computing, MobiHoc '06, pages 108--119, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Y. Pigné, G. Danoy, and P. Bouvry. Sensitivity analysis for a realistic vehicular mobility model. In ACM international symposium on Design and analysis of intelligent vehicular networks and applications (DIVANet 2011), pages 31--38. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Y. Pigné, G. Danoy, and P. Bouvry. A vehicular mobility model based on real traffic counting data. In Proc. 3rd International Workshop on Communication Technologies for Vehicles (Nets4Cars 2011), volume 6596, pages 131--142. Springer, LNCS, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. Potter and K. De Jong. A cooperative coevolutionary approach to function optimization. In Parallel Problem Solving from Nature (PPSN III), pages 249--257. Springer, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. M. A. Potter. The design and analysis of a computational model of cooperative coevolution. PhD thesis, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. M. Seredynski, G. Danoy, M. Tabatabaei, P. Bouvry, and Y. Pigné. Generation of realistic mobility for vanets using genetic algorithms. In IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pages 1--8. IEEE, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. S. Uppoor and M. Fiore. Large-scale urban vehicular mobility for networking research. In O. Altintas, W. Chen, and G. J. Heijenk, editors, VNC, pages 62--69. IEEE, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. F. Wilcoxon. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bulletin, 1(6):80--83, 1945.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Vehicular mobility model optimization using cooperative coevolutionary genetic algorithms

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          GECCO '13: Proceedings of the 15th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
          July 2013
          1672 pages
          ISBN:9781450319638
          DOI:10.1145/2463372
          • Editor:
          • Christian Blum,
          • General Chair:
          • Enrique Alba

          Copyright © 2013 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 6 July 2013

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          GECCO '13 Paper Acceptance Rate204of570submissions,36%Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

          Upcoming Conference

          GECCO '24
          Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
          July 14 - 18, 2024
          Melbourne , VIC , Australia
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader