skip to main content
10.1145/2465958.2465970acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseuroitvConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Viewer behaviors and practices in the (new) television environment

Published:24 June 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents the main results of a study conducted in Portugal with the aim of identifying the current trends of the television ecosystem, with special relevance to understand the cognitive processes of viewers when selecting what to watch on TV. To this end, an online survey targeted mainly to young adults with mid to high academic degrees was designed. The survey gathered more than 600 responses, of which 550 were validated and taken into account in the data analysis. The results provide a detailed insight about the habits, dynamics and behaviors of spectators regarding the actual scenario of television. It also allowed the identification of the most relevant criteria considered by viewers when deciding what to watch on TV. The most important ones include the program genre followed by the state of mind (mood), the people who share the couch with and the time available to watch TV. The results also provide a structuring framework for the design of interactive television applications, targeted to this audience in the areas of personalization, recommendation and search and discovery of TV content.

References

  1. Adomavicius, G., & Tuzhilin, A. (2005). Toward the Next Generation of Recommender Systems: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art and Possible Extensions. IEEE Trans. on Knowl. and Data Eng., 17(6), 734--749. doi:10.1109/TKDE.2005.99 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Anacom. (2012). Serviço de Televisão por subscrição - 3o trimestre 2012. Retrieved January 20, 2013, from http://www.anacom.pt/streaming/3T2012servTVsubscricao.pdf?contentId=1143782&field=ATTACHED_FILEGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Aroyo, L., Nixon, L., & Miller, L. (2011). NoTube: The television experience enhanced by online social and semantic data. 2011 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (pp. 269--273). Berlin.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Bär, A., Berger, A., Egger, S., & Schatz, R. (2008). A Lightweight Mobile TV Recommender. In M. Tscheligi, M. Obrist, & A. Lugmayr (Eds.), Changing Television Environments (Vol. 5066, pp. 143--147). Springer Berlin / Heidelberg. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Blanco, Y., Pazos, J. J., Gil, A., Ramos, M., Fernández, A., Díaz, R. P., López, M., et al. (2005). AVATAR: an approach based on semantic reasoning to recommend personalized TV programs. Special interest tracks and posters of the 14th international conference on World Wide Web (pp. 1078--1079). New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/1062745.1062877 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bueno, D., Conejo, R., Martín, D., León, J., & Recuenco, J. (2008). What Can I Watch on TV Tonight? In W. Nejdl, J. Kay, P. Pu, & E. Herder (Eds.), Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems (Vol. 5149, pp. 271--274). Springer Berlin / Heidelberg. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Cesar, P., Bulterman,D., & Jansen, A. (2008). Usages of the Secondary Screen in an Interactive Television Environment: Control, Enrich, Share, and Transfer Television Content. In Tscheligi, M., Obrist, M. & Lugmayr, A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th European conference on Changing Television Environments (EUROITV '08). (pp. 168--177) Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg,. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. ContentWise. (n.d.). Content Discovery, Relevance and Engagement. Retrieved January 16, 2013, from http://www.contentwise.tv/product/discovery/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Denicoli, S. (2012). A implementação da Televisão Digital Terrestre em Portugal. Universidade do Minho. Retrieved January 20, 2013, from http://www.lasics.uminho.pt/ojs/index.php/TDT_Portugal/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Digitalsmiths. (2012). Personalized Video Discovery: Best Practices for Optimizing Revenue Streams. Retrieved from http://www.digitalsmiths.com/downloads/Tips_to_Optimize_Revenue_with_Personalized_Video_Discovery.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Digitalsmiths. (2012). Q4 2012 Video Discovery Trends Report: Consumer Behavior Across Pay-TV, VOD, OTT and Next-Gen Features. Retrieved January 14, 2013, from http://www.digitalsmiths.com/downloads/Digitalsmiths_Q4_2012_Video_Discovery_Trends_Report.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Doughty, M., Rowland, D. & Lawson, S. (2012). Who is on your sofa?: TV audience communities and second screening social networks. In Proceedings of the 10th European conference on Interactive tv and video (EuroiTV '12). (pp. 79--86) ACM, New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Ericsson ConsumerLab. (2011). TV & Video 2011: Consumer Trends. Retrieved January 14, 2013, from http://www.ericsson.com/res/docs/2011/11_1650_RevB_TV_Video_Consumer_Trends_2011_Global_Version.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Ericsson ConsumerLab. (2012). TV and Video: An analysis of evolving consumer habits. Retrieved January 14, 2013, from http://www.ericsson.com/res/docs/2012/consumerlab/tv_video_consumerlab_report.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Fox International Channels (UK). (2011). The Walking Dead - Walkers Kill Count. Apple Store. Retrieved January 21, 2013, from https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/walking-dead-walkers-kill/id498529661?mt=8Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Fraunhofer FOKUS. (2012). TV Predictor: Personalized Program Recommendations to be displayed on Hybrid TVs. International Broadcasting Fair (IFA).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Gregory-Clarke, R. (2012). Subjective Assessment of a User-controlled Interface for a TV Recommender System. In EuroITV 2012 -- Adjunct Proceedings (pp. 76--79).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Gregory-Clarke, R., & Newell, C. (2012). TV Recommender System Field Trial Using Dynamic Collaborative Filtering. In EuroITV 2012 -- Adjunct Proceedings (pp. 123--126).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Hsu, S., Wen, M.-H., Lin, H.-C., Lee, C.-C., & Lee, C.-H. (2007). AIMED - A Personalized TV Recommendation System. In P. Cesar, K. Chorianopoulos, & J. Jensen (Eds.), Interactive TV: a Shared Experience (Vol. 4471, pp. 166--174). Springer Berlin / Heidelberg. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Jinni. (n.d.). Jinni. Retrieved January 12, 2013, from http://www.jinni.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Obercom. (2011). Anuário da Comunicação 2010--2011. Retrieved January 20, 2013, from http://www.obercom.pt/client/?newsId=28&fileName=anuario1011.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Oliveira, E., Martins, P. & Chambel, T. (2011). Ifelt: accessing movies through our emotions. In Proceddings of the 9th international interactive conference on Interactive television (EuroITV '11). (pp. 105--114) ACM, New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Orca Interactive. (2011). Recommendations 360o: A Holistic Approach to Content Discovery. Retrieved January 18, 2013, from http://www.orcainteractive.com/images/stories/pdf/ORCA_WP_Recommendations_360.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. PT Comunicações. (2011). MEO Remote. Apple Store. Retrieved January 21, 2013, from https://itunes.apple.com/pt/app/meo-remote/id400895046?mt=8Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. PT Comunicações. (2013). Vantagens TV Fibra e ADSL - MEO - É Outra Vida. Retrieved January 22, 2013, from http://meo.pt/conhecer/tv/vantagens-fibra-e-adslGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Quico, C., Damásio, M. J., & Henriques, S. (2012). Digital TV adopters and non-adopters in the context of the analogue terrestrial TV switchover in Portugal. In Proceedings of the 10th European conference on Interactive tv and video - EuroiTV '12 (p. 213). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Red Bee Media. (2012). An Integrated Approach to TV & VOD Recommendations. Retrieved January 12, 2013, from http://www.redbeemedia.com/sites/all/files/downloads/an_integrated_approach_to_tv_vod_recommendations__white_paper_red_bee_media.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Red Bee Media. (2012). Second Screen Series - Paper 1: Setting The Scene. Retrieved January 12, 2013, from http://www.redbeemedia.com/sites/all/files/downloads/second_screen_series_paper_1_whitepaper_red_bee_media.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Red Bee Media. (2012). The Content Discovery Revolution. Retrieved January 12, 2013, from http://www.redbeemedia.com/insights/content-discovery-revolutionGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. The Nielsen Company. (2012). State of the Media: The Cross-Platform Report Q2 2012 - US. Retrieved January 15, 2013, from http://www.nielsen.com/content/dam/corporate/us/en/reports-downloads/2012-Reports/Nielsen-Cross-Platform-Report-Q2--2012-final.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. The Nielsen Company. (2013). State of the Media: The Cross-Platform Report Q3 2012 - US. Retrieved January 15, 2013, fromhttp://nielsen.com/content/dam/corporate/us/en/reports-downloads/2013 Reports/Nielsen Cross Platform Report_Q3_2012.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Zeebox. (2012). Zeebox. Retrieved January 21, 2013, from http://zeebox.com/welcomeGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. ZON Multimedia. (2013). IRIS - A melhor experiência TV do mundo | Residencial. Retrieved January 22, 2013, from http://www.zon.pt/tv/iris/vantagens1/Pages/default.aspxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Viewer behaviors and practices in the (new) television environment

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        EuroITV '13: Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Interactive TV and Video
        June 2013
        188 pages
        ISBN:9781450319515
        DOI:10.1145/2465958

        Copyright © 2013 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 24 June 2013

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        EuroITV '13 Paper Acceptance Rate21of58submissions,36%Overall Acceptance Rate52of149submissions,35%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader