skip to main content
10.1145/2465958.2465976acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseuroitvConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Vox populi: enabling community-based narratives through collaboration and content creation

Published:24 June 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

The traditional models of content delivery and creation as well as the roles of content producer and content consumer are being challenged in an environment of increasing user generated content. While the amount of user generated content is growing, there is an imbalance with respect to its quality and variety. In this paper, we discuss our research into two real collaborative documentary productions. We present two collaborative models of digital narrative content creation that demonstrate the way in which users have more control over their content and have a more immersive experience with the content. Curation of crowdsourced assets after a major natural disaster is explored in the production of "lenses + landscapes". We discuss crowdsourcing as a means to utilize existing media assets to deliver a narrative experience that consists of many small parts, but whose overall impact as a whole is greater than the sum. Co-located collaborative content creation is examined in the production of "places + perspectives". The implementation of large, remotely located touchscreens in collaborative sessions is illustrated and analyzed. By presenting the findings and details of our two experiments on collaborative storytelling, our goal is to demonstrate different methods for creating and curating collaborative content in and over remote locations to allow for a unique and enhanced user experience for content creators, collaborators and viewers.

References

  1. "4K Resolution". 2013. PCMAG.com Encylopedia. n.d. Web. (Jan. 26, 2013) http://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhimani, J. Mahdia, A. Almahr, A. Shirai D. and Ohta, N. 2012. Growing Documentary: Creating a Collaborative Computer-Supported Story Telling Environment, SIGGRAPH 2012, Los Angeles. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Buffone, J. 2012. Internet Connected TVs Are Used To Watch TV, And That?s About All. The NPD Group Blog (Dec 26, 2012). https://www.npdgroupblog.com/internetconnected-tvs-are-used-to-watch-tv-and-thats-about-all/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Cesar, P. and Chorianopoulos, K . 2008. Interactivity and user participation in the television lifecycle: creating, sharing, and controlling content. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Designing interactive user experiences for TV and video (UXTV '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, (2008) 125--128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. CineGrid 2011. http://www.cinegrid.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Cisco White Papers. 2012. Cisco Visual Networking Index: Forecast and Methodology, 2011--2016 White Paper, (May 30, 2012). www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns341/ns525/ns537/ns705/ns827/white_paper_c11--481360.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Cioccaa, G., Olivob, P., and Schettinia, R. 2012. Browsing museum image collections on a multi-touch table. Information Systems, Volume 37, Issue 2 (April 2012), 169--182. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Howe, J. 2006. The Rise of Crowdsourcing. Wired Magazine, 14, 6 (June, 2006). http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.06/crowds.html Figure 12. Network configuration and settings used between UME Board (Berlin, Germany) and SAGE (Japan).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jenkins, H. 2006. Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Kaplan, A. and Haenlein, M. 2010. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, Volume 53, Issue 1 (Jan.-Feb., 2010), 59--68.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Landau, M. 1984. Human Evolution as Narrative. American Scientist, 72 (May-June, 1984), 262--268.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. "lenses + landscapes". 2011. http://vimeo.com/31093347Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Pimenta, S. and Poovaiah, R. 2010. On Defining Visual Narratives. Design Thoughts (August 2010), 25--46.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. PIX System. http://www.pixsystem.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. "places + perspectives". 2012. http://vimeo.com/47917016Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Prensky, M. 2001. Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, 9, 5 (Oct. 2001). http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/prensky%20-%20digital%20natives,%20digital%20immigrants%20-%20part1.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Renambot, L., Rao, A., Singh, R., Jeong, B., Krishnaprasad, N., Vishwanath, V., Chandrasekhar, V., Schwarz, N., Spale, A., Zhang, C., Goldman, G., Leigh, J. and Johnson, A. 2004. SAGE: the Scalable Adaptive Graphics Environment. In Proceedings of WACE 2004 (4th Workshop on Advanced Collaborative Environments, Nice, France, Sept. 23-24, 2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Reyes, A. 2010. Towards Crowdsourcing for Disaster Management. UbiComp10 (2010) - Workshop.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Scalable Adaptive Graphics Environment. http://www.sagecommons.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Shirai D., Kitamura, M., Fuji, M., Takahara, A., Kaneko, K. and Ohta. N. 2011. Multi-point 4K/2K layered video streaming for remote collaboration. Future Generation Computer Systems, Volume 27, Issue 7 (July, 2011), 986--990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Sørensen, K., Bahnsen, M., Holch, H., Hvid, G. and Otte, L. 2002 Guidelines for producing a short documentary, p.o.v.: A Danish Journal of Film Studies, No. 13 (March 2002),126--127.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Starbird, K. and Palen, L. 2011. "Voluntweeters": Self-Organizing by Digital Volunteers in Times of Crisis. Proc of CHI 2011, 1071--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Whitelaw, B. 2011. Almost all YouTube views come from just 30% of films. The Telegraph. (April 20, 2011). http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/8464418/Almost-all-YouTube-views-come-from-just-30-of-films.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Wigley, S. 2012. Eastern thinking: Philip Martin on Japan in a Day. British Film Institute. (Oct. 19, 2012). http://www.bfi.org.uk/news/eastern-thinking-philip-martin-japan-dayGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Willett, R. 2009. In the Frame: Mapping Camcorder Cultures in Video Cultures: Media Technology and Everyday Creativity edited by David Buckingham and Rebekah Willet(New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan), 1--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. YouTube Statistics. http://www.youtube.com/t/press_statisticsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Vox populi: enabling community-based narratives through collaboration and content creation

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          EuroITV '13: Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Interactive TV and Video
          June 2013
          188 pages
          ISBN:9781450319515
          DOI:10.1145/2465958

          Copyright © 2013 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 24 June 2013

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          EuroITV '13 Paper Acceptance Rate21of58submissions,36%Overall Acceptance Rate52of149submissions,35%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader