skip to main content
10.1145/2466533.2466534acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesweb3dConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

3D animated agent for tutoring based on WebGL

Published:20 June 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

The goal of the work presented in this paper is to develop a 3D web based online tutoring system that enhances the motivation and cognitive development of students. To achieve this, a virtual assistant will be integrated to the e-learning platform; this 3D modeled e-tutor will evaluate each student individually, it will react to their learning progress by empathetic gestures and it will guide them through the lectures according to their personal needs. The accomplishment of these tasks will imply a thorough study of the latest techniques on artificial intelligence, multi-agent architectures and their representation by means of 3D emotional avatars.

References

  1. Abrilian, S., Devillers, L., Buisine, S., and Martin, J.-C. 2005. Emotv1: Annotation of real-life emotions for the specification of multimodal affective interfaces. In HCI International.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Adkins, 2013. The worldwide market for self-paced elearning products and services: 2011-2016 forecast and analysis, January.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmed, K. S. 2005. Animated pedagogical agents in web-based intelligent learning environment.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. André, E., Rist, T., and Müller, J. 1997. WebPersona: A Life-Like Presentation Agent for Educational Applications on the World-Wide Web. In Workshop on "Intelligent Educational Systems on the World Wide Web", 8th World Conference of the AIED Society.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Baylor, A., and Ebbers, S. 2003. The pedagogical agent split-persona effect: When two agents are better than one. In World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, vol. 2003, 459--462.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Baylor, A. L., and Ryu, J. 2003. The effects of image and animation in enhancing pedagogical agent persona. Journal of Educational Computing Research 28, 4, 373--394.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Benin, A., Leone, G. R., and Cosi, P. 2012. A 3d talking head for mobile devices based on unofficial ios webgl support. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on 3D Web Technology, ACM, 117--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Bloom, B. S. 1984. The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher 13, 6, 4--16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Buisine, S., and Martin, J.-C. 2007. The effects of speech--gesture cooperation in animated agents behavior in multimedia presentations. Interacting with Computers 19, 4, 484--493. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Carretero, M., Ardanza, A., García, S., Díez, H., Oyarzun, D., and Ruiz, N. 2012. Improving gestural communication in virtual characters. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Articulated Motion and Deformable Objects, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, AMDO'12, 69--81. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Cassell, J., Pelachaud, C., Badler, N., Steedman, M., Achorn, B., Becket, T., Douville, B., Prevost, S., and Stone, M. 1994. Animated conversation: rule-based generation of facial expression, gesture & spoken intonation for multiple conversational agents. In Proceedings of the 21st annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, ACM, 413--420. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Dehn, D. M., and Van Mulken, S. 2000. The impact of animated interface agents: a review of empirical research. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 52, 1, 1--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. D'mello, S., and Graesser, A. 2012. Autotutor and affective autotutor: Learning by talking with cognitively and emotionally intelligent computers that talk back. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS) 2, 4, 23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Ekman, P., and Friesen, W. V. 1981. The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage, and coding. Nonverbal communication, interaction, and gesture, 57--106.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Gulz, A., and Haake, M. 2006. Design of animated pedagogical agentsa look at their look. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64, 4, 322--339. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Hu, X. 2011. Autotutor lite (interactive event).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnson, W. L., and Rickel, J. 1997. Steve: An animated pedagogical agent for procedural training in virtual environments. ACM SIGART Bulletin 8, 1-4, 16--21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Johnson, W. L., Rickel, J. W., and Lester, J. C. 2000. Animated pedagogical agents: Face-to-face interaction in interactive learning environments. International Journal of Artificial intelligence in education 11, 1, 47--78.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson, W. L. 1998. Pedagogical agents. In Proceedings of ICCE98, 13--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Kohar, H., and Ginn, I. 1997. Mediators: guides through online tv services. In CHI'97 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems: looking to the future, ACM, 38--39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Lepper, M. R., Woolverton, M., Mumme, D. L., and Gurtner, J. L. 1993. Motivational techniques of expert human tutors: Lessons for the design of computer-based tutors. In Computers as Cognitive Tools, S. P. Lajoie and S. J. Derry, Eds. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 75--105.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Lester, J. C., and Stone, B. A. 1997. Increasing believability in animated pedagogical agents. In Proceedings of the first international conference on Autonomous agents, ACM, New York, NY, USA, AGENTS '97, 16--21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Lester, J. C., Converse, S. A., Kahler, S. E., Barlow, S. T., Stone, B. A., and Bhogal, R. S. 1997. The persona effect: affective impact of animated pedagogical agents. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, 359--366. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Leung, C., and Salga, A. 2010. Enabling webgl. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web, ACM, 1369--1370. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. McCloud, S. 1994. Understanding comics. William Morrow Paperbacks.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Mlakar, I., and Rojc, M. 2011. Towards ecas animation of expressive complex behaviour. Analysis of Verbal and Nonverbal Communication and Enactment. The Processing Issues, 185--198. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Moundridou, M., and Virvou, M. 2002. Evaluating the persona effect of an interface agent in a tutoring system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 18, 3, 253--261.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Nass, C., Isbister, K., and Lee, E.-J. 2000. Truth is beauty: Researching embodied conversational agents. Embodied conversational agents, 374--402. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Pandzic, I. S., and Forchheimer, R., Eds. 2003. MPEG-4 Facial Animation: The Standard, Implementation and Applications. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Piesk, and Trogermann. 1998. Presenting educational contents in nonlinear narrative structures by conventional virtual actors. In Proceedings of ED-MEDIA98, 1885--1888.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Rieger, T., et al. 2003. Avatar gestures. Journal of WSCG 2003 11, 379--386.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Schöch V, S. M., and G, W. 1998. adi an empirical evaluation of a tutoring agent. In Proceedings of ED-MEDIA98, 1271--1282.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Shaw, E., Johnson, W. L., and Ganeshan, R. 1999. Pedagogical agents on the web. In Proceedings of the third annual conference on Autonomous Agents, ACM, 283--290. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Van Mulken, S., André, E., and Müller, J. 1998. The persona effect: How substantial is it? People and Computers, 53--66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. 3D animated agent for tutoring based on WebGL

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            Web3D '13: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on 3D Web Technology
            June 2013
            220 pages
            ISBN:9781450321334
            DOI:10.1145/2466533

            Copyright © 2013 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 20 June 2013

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate27of71submissions,38%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader