skip to main content
10.1145/2466627.2466647acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesc-n-cConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Indirect control and making actions explicit in 3D drawing

Published:17 June 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper aims to broaden the understanding of computer mediated creativity from a material perspective, by emphasizing the qualities of resistance and making users' actions explicit in the design process. Resistance of material refers to the challenging nature of realizing one's intention through material during the design process. Materials are also instrumental in making user actions of creating artifacts explicit through temporary structures, residues and tools. By drawing on the accounts of craft work and design, the paper discusses how these two qualities can be deliberately addressed in the design of tools to support creative activity. The design approach is operationalized in a 3D drawing tool with the use of indirect control to control curves. The prototype was evaluated with industrial design students and practitioners in two stages, in recorded sessions and through self-documentation. The participant responses give insights into the concept of materiality in creativity support tools and in which cases these features were embraced or dismissed.

References

  1. Beaudouin-Lafon, M. Instrumental Interaction: An interaction model for designing post-wimp user interfaces. In Proc. CHI 2000, ACM Press (2000), 446--453. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bertelsen, O. W., Breinbjerg, M., and Pold, S. Instrumentness for Creativity Mediation, Materiality & Metonymy. C&C 2007, ACM Press (2007), 233--242. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Cohen, E., Lyche, T., and Riesenfeld, R. MCAD: Key Historical Developments. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 199 (2010), 224--228.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Dormer, P. The art of the maker: Skill and its meaning in art, craft and design. Thames and Hudson, London, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Farin, G. A History of Curves and Surfaces in CAGD. In Handbook of Computer Aided Geometry Design. 2002, 1--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Gaver, B., Dunne, T. and Pacenti, E. Design: Cultural probes. Interactions 6, 1 (1999), 21--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Grossman, T., Matejka, J. and Fitzmaurice, G. Chronicle: capture, exploration and playback of document workflow histories. In Proc. UIST 2010, ACM Press (2010), 143--152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Henderson, K. On line and on paper: Visual representations, visual culture, and computer graphics in design engineering. The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Ingold, T. The textility of making. Cambridge Journal of Economics 34, 1 (2010), 91--102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Jacucci, C., Jacucci, G., Wagner, I., and Psik, T. A manifesto for the performative development of ubiquitous media. In Proc.CC 2005, ACM Press (2005), 19--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jacucci, G. and Wagner, I. Performative roles of materiality for collective creativity. In Proc. C&C 2007, ACM Press (2007), 73--82. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Klemmer, R. S., Thomsen, M., Phelps-Goodman, E., Lee, R. and Landay, J. A. Where do web sites come from? Capturing and interacting with design history. In Proc. CHI 2002, ACM Press (2002), 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Laurel, B. K. Toward the design of a computer-based interactive fantasy system. Diss. Ohio State University, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Löwgren, J. and Slolterman, E. Thoughtful Interaction Design: A Design Perspective on Information Technology. The MIT Press, Cambridge, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Mattelmäki, T. Design Probes. UIAH, Helsinki, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. McCullough, Malcolm. Abstracting Craft: The Practiced Digital Hand. The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Ozenc, F. K., Kim, M., Zimmerman, J., Oney, S., and Myers, B. How to support designers in getting hold of the immaterial material of software. In Proc. CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 2513--2522. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Pye, D. The nature and art of workmanship. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1968.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Raisamo, R. An Alternative Way of Drawing. In Proc. CHI 1999, ACM Press (1999), 175--182. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Rieman, J. The Diary Study: A Workplace-Oriented Research Tool to Guide Laboratory Efforts. In Proc. INTERCHI'03, ACM Press (1993), 321--326. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Rosner, D. K., Ikemiya, M., Kim, D. and Koch, K. Designing with Traces. In Proc. CHI 2013, ACM Press (2013), 1649--1658. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Schön, D, A. Designing as Reflective Conversation with the Materials of a Design Situation. Knowledge-Based Systems, 5, 1 (1992), 3--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. St. Amant, R. and Horton, T. E. Characterizing tool use in an interactive drawing environment. In. Proc SMARTGRAPH 2002, (2002), 86--93. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Suchman, L. Embodied practices of engineering work. Mind, Culture & Activity 7 (2000), 4--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Sundström, P. and Höök, K. Hand in Hand with the Material?: Designing for Suppleness. In Proc. CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 463--472. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Terry, M. and Mynatt, E. D. Recognizing creative needs in user interface design. In Proc. C&C 2002, ACM Press (2002), 38--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Terry, M. et al. Variation in Element and Action: Supporting Simultaneous Development of Alternative Solutions. In Proc. CHI 2004, ACM Press (2004), 711--718. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Tholander, J., Normark, M., and Rossitto, C. Understanding agency in interaction design materials. In Proc. CHI 2012, ACM Press (2012), 2499--2508. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Tillyard, S. The Impact of Modernism 1900-1920: Early Modernism and the Arts and Craft Movement in Edwardian England. Routledge, London, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Vallgårda, A. and Sokoler, T. A Material Strategy?: Exploring Material Properties of Computers. International Journal of Design 4, 3 (2010), 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Yamamoto, Y. and Nakakoji, K. Interaction design of tools for fostering creativity in the early stages of information design. International Journal of HumanComputer Studies 63, 4-5 (2005), 513--535. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Zilczer, J. The Theory of Direct Carving in Modern Sculpture. Oxford Art Journal 4, 2 (1981), 44--49.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Indirect control and making actions explicit in 3D drawing

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      C&C '13: Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Creativity & Cognition
      June 2013
      433 pages
      ISBN:9781450321501
      DOI:10.1145/2466627

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 17 June 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      C&C '13 Paper Acceptance Rate28of88submissions,32%Overall Acceptance Rate108of371submissions,29%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader