Hana Vrzakova
ABSTRACT
Interaction error prevention needs to start from a good understanding of the context of an error. One of the central issues in gaze-interaction research is the suppression of the so-called Midas touch: the interface's incorrect evaluation of user gaze as a purposeful interaction command. We conduct a detailed analysis of numerous instances of these events during interactive problem-solving. By developing and applying an annotation scheme we present a taxonomy of the errors and remedial strategies users employ. We present the nuances, richness and development of the user behavior when dealing with the outcomes of the error, and uncover two major coping strategies. The knowledge will be used to design automatic error-prevention mechanisms for gaze-based interaction.
- Bednarik, R., Gowases, T., and Tukiainen, M. Gaze interaction enhances problem solving: Eects of dwell-time based, gaze-augmented, and mouse interaction on problem-solving strategies and user experience. Journal of Eye Movement Research 3, 1 (2009), 1--10.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Ferrez, P. W., and Millán, J. D. R. You are wrong!: automatic detection of interaction errors from brain waves. In Proc. of the 19th int. joint conference on Artificial intelligence, IJCAI'05, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. (San Francisco, CA, USA, 2005), 1413--1418. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jacob, R. J. K. What you look at is what you get: Eye movement-based interaction techniques. In ACM CHI '90: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (1990), 11--18. ISBN: 0--201--50932--6. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, The Language Archive, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Elan. http://tla.mpi.nl/tools/tla-tools/elan/, 2008.Google Scholar
- Norman, D. A. The Design of Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York, 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Prabhu, P., V., and Prabhu, G., V. Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction Chapter 22 Human Error and User-Interface Design. Elsevier Science B. V., 1997.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tobii Technology AB. Clearview 2.7 eye gaze analysis software. http://www.tobii.com/scientific_research/, 2008.Google Scholar
- Vi, C., and Subramanian, S. Detecting error-related negativity for interaction design. In Proc. of the SIGCHI 2012, CHI '12, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2012), 493--502. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- That's not norma(n/l): a detailed analysis of midas touch in gaze-based problem-solving
Recommendations
GAWSCHI: gaze-augmented, wearable-supplemented computer-human interaction
ETRA '16: Proceedings of the Ninth Biennial ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & ApplicationsRecent developments in eye tracking technology are paving the way for gaze-driven interaction as the primary interaction modality. Despite successful efforts, existing solutions to the "Midas Touch" problem have two inherent issues: 1) lower accuracy, ...
Designing for the eye: design parameters for dwell in gaze interaction
OzCHI '12: Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction ConferenceEye gaze tracking provides a natural and fast method of interacting with computers. Many click alternatives have been proposed so far, each with their own merits and drawbacks. We focus on the most natural selection method, i.e. the dwell, with which a ...
Gaze and Touch Interaction on Tablets
UIST '16: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and TechnologyWe explore how gaze can support touch interaction on tablets. When holding the device, the free thumb is normally limited in reach, but can provide an opportunity for indirect touch input. Here we propose gaze and touch input, where touches redirect to ...
Comments