skip to main content
10.1145/2468356.2468513acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Persuasive dialogue for older adults: promoting and encouraging social interaction

Published:27 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

We describe a persuasive dialogue component for promoting and encouraging social interaction for older adults. In order to identify effective persuasive strategies we conducted an interview study with formal carers for older adults. From the results of our study we have identified 6 persuasive strategies, information requirements and developed a model using rules for assessing older adult profiles and applying persuasive strategies.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Alaoui, M., and Lewkowicz, M. Struggling against social isolation of the elderlythe design of smarttv applications. From Res. to Pract. in the Des. of Coop. Sys.: Results and Open Challenges (2012), 261--275.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Biordi, D., and Nicholson, N. Social isolation. Chronic Illn. (2012), 97.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Chan, M., Campo, E., Est'eve, D., and Fourniols, J.-Y. Smart homes - current features and future perspectives. Maturitas 64, 2 (Oct. 2009), 90--7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Dabrowska, E., and Cornford, T. Policy and telehealth: Social implications of telehealth and telecare technologies. AMCIS 1998 Proceedings (1998), 20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. E.Grundy. Care for older people in the UK: problems, provision and policy. In Proc. Seminario Internacional: Experiencas internationalces propuestas para consolidar la red nacio, Costa Rica (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Finch, T., Mort, M., May, C., and Mair, F. Telecare: perspectives on the changing role of patients and citizens. J. Telemed. Telecare 11, suppl 1 (2005), 51--53.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Grenade, L., and Boldy, D. Social isolation and loneliness among older people: issues and future challenges in community and residential settings. Aust. Health Rev. 32, 3 (2008), 468--478.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Harley, D., and Fitzpatrick, G. Appropriation of social networking by older people: two case studies.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Hicks Jr, T. What is your life like now? loneliness and elderly individuals residing in nursing homes. J. Gerontol. Nurs. 26, 8 (2000), 15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Lee, D., Helal, S., Anton, S., De Deugd, S., and Smith, A. Participatory and persuasive telehealth. Geront. 58, 3 (2012), 269--281.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Lee, D., Helal, S., and Johnson, B. An action-based behavior model for persuasive telehealth. Aging Friendly Techn. for Health and Indep. (2010), 121--129. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Oinas-Kukkonen, H., and Harjumaa, M. Persuasive systems design: Key issues, process model, and system features. Comm of the Assoc for I. S. 24, 1 (2009), 28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Perry, J., Beyer, S., Francis, J., and Holmes, P. Ethical issues in the use of telecare. Soc. Car. Inst. for Excell., Lon. (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Petty, R., and Cacioppo, J. Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Pfeil, U., and Zaphiris, P. Investigating social network patterns within an empathic online community for older people. Comp. in Hum. Beh. 25, 5 (2009), 1139--1155. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Sethi, R., Bagga, G., Carpenter, D., Azzi, D., and Khusainov, R. Telecare: Legal, ethical and socioeconomic factors. In Biomed. Eng./765: Teleh./766: Assist. Techn., ACTA Press (2012).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Sun, H., De Florio, V., Gui, N., and Blondia, C. Promises and challenges of ambient assisted living systems. In I. T: New Gen, 2009. ITNG'09. 6th Int. Conf. on, IEEE (2009), 1201--1207. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Todorov, A., Chaiken, S., and Henderson, M. The heuristic-systematic model of social information processing. The pers. hnbk: Dev. in theory and practice (2002), 195--211.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Persuasive dialogue for older adults: promoting and encouraging social interaction

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '13: CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2013
      3360 pages
      ISBN:9781450319522
      DOI:10.1145/2468356

      Copyright © 2013 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s)

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 April 2013

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI EA '13 Paper Acceptance Rate630of1,963submissions,32%Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader