skip to main content
10.1145/2468356.2468616acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Improving user comfort and office energy efficiency with POEM (personal office energy monitor)

Published:27 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Consensus exists in much of industry and academia that engaging end-users is an essential element for improving energy efficiency in office buildings.

We present our experiences implementing and deploying POEM (Personal Office Energy Monitor) with real office users. POEM is an end-user eco-feedback application. It provides detailed personalized data on energy usage and ambient conditions to each office user, as well as reporting aggregates for building-level management and policy setting. The POEM UI also allows users to state their subjective feeling of comfort. The system aggregates those inputs and informs the building manager to take corrective action if needed - thus closing the control loop between the people and the building. We report our findings from pilot tests of POEM prototype.

References

  1. ASHRAE Standard 55--2004 Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy (ANSI Approved), 2004, pp 35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. G.S. Brager, M.E. Fountain, C.C. Benton, E.A. Arens, F.S. Bauman, "A comparison of methods for assessing thermal sensation and acceptability in the field," in Proc. Thermal Comfort: Past, Present and Future, N.A. Oseland, M.A. Humphreys, Eds., Farston, UK, 1994, pp. 17--37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. A. T. Campbell and et al., "The rise of people centric sensing," IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 12--21, 2008 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. S. Consolvo, P. Klasnja, D. McDonald, D. Avrahami, J. Froehlich, L. LeGrand, R. Libby, K. Mosher, and J. Landay, "Flowers or a robot army? encouraging awareness & activity with personal, mobile displays," in Proc. of the UbiComp08, Seoul, Korea, 2008, pp. 54-- 63. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. C. DiSalvo, P. Sengers, and H. Brynjarsdttir, "Mapping the landscape of sustainable hci," in Proc. of the CHI10, Atlanta, Georgia, 2010, pp. 1975--1984. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. D. Foster, S. Lawson, J.Wardman, M. Blythe, and C. Linehan, "'watts in it for me?' design implications for implementing effective energy interventions in organisations," in Proc. of the CHI 12, Austin, Texas, 2012, pp. 2357--2366. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. Froehlich, L. Findlater, and J. Landay, "The design of eco-feedback technology," in Proc. of the CHI10, Atlanta, Georgia, 2010, pp. 37--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. GIE. (2011) Gie (consortium) enjeu energie positive (eep), positive-energy challenge. http://www.enjeu-energie-positive.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. H. He, S. Greenberg, and E. M. Huang, "One size does not fit all: Applying the transtheoretical model to energy feedback technology design," in Proc. of the CHI10, Atlanta, Georgia, 2010, pp. 1--11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Intel Labs. (2012) Poem video. http://youtu.be/nKS45p5cjd0Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. M. Milenkovic, U. Hanebutte, T. Dang, "POEM - A User-Centric Approach to Energy Efficiency in Office Buildings," Proc. ACM 3rd workshop on Embedded Sensing Systems for Energy-Efficiency in Buildings (BuildSys 11), November 2011, Seattle, Washington, pp 37--38 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. Milenkovic, T. Dang, U. Hanebutte, and Y. Huang, "Platform-integrated sensors and personalized sensing in smart buildings," Proc. 2nd international conference on sensor networks (SENSORNETS) 2013, ScitePress, Feb 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. OSC. (2011) Oregon sustainability center. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oregon_Sustainability_Cen terGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. J. Pierce and E. Paulos, "Beyond energy monitors: interaction, energy, and emerging energy systems," in Proc. of the CHI12, Austin, Texas, 2012, pp. 665--674. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. F. Siero, A. Bakker, G. Dekker, and T. van den Burg, "Changing organizational energy consumption behavior through comparative feedback," Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 16, pp. 235--246, 1996. Demonstration video of POEM prototype {10}Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Improving user comfort and office energy efficiency with POEM (personal office energy monitor)

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '13: CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2013
      3360 pages
      ISBN:9781450319522
      DOI:10.1145/2468356

      Copyright © 2013 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s)

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 April 2013

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI EA '13 Paper Acceptance Rate630of1,963submissions,32%Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader