skip to main content
10.1145/2470654.2466112acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

IllumiRoom: peripheral projected illusions for interactive experiences

Authors Info & Claims
Published:27 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

IllumiRoom is a proof-of-concept system that augments the area surrounding a television with projected visualizations to enhance traditional gaming experiences. We investigate how projected visualizations in the periphery can negate, include, or augment the existing physical environment and complement the content displayed on the television screen. Peripheral projected illusions can change the appearance of the room, induce apparent motion, extend the field of view, and enable entirely new physical gaming experiences. Our system is entirely self-calibrating and is designed to work in any room. We present a detailed exploration of the design space of peripheral projected illusions and we demonstrate ways to trigger and drive such illusions from gaming content. We also contribute specific feedback from two groups of target users (10 gamers and 15 game designers); providing insights for enhancing game experiences through peripheral projected illusions.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

chi1187-file3.mp4

mp4

54.8 MB

References

  1. Aides, A., Avraham, T., and Schechner, Y.Y. Multiscale Ultrawide Foveated Video Extrapolation. IEEE ICCP, (2011).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Batlle, J., Mouaddib, E., and Salvi, J. Recent progress in coded structured light as a technique to solve the correspondence problem: a survey. Pattern recognition 31, 7 (1998), 963--982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Baudisch, P., Good, N., and Stewart, P. Focus Plus Context Screens: Combining Display Technology with Visualization Techniques. ACM UIST, (2001). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Benko, H., Jota, R., and Wilson, A. MirageTable: Freehand Interaction on a Projected Augmented Reality Tabletop. ACM CHI, (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bimber, O., Coriand, F., Kleppe, A., Bruns, E., Zollmann, S., and Langlotz, T. Superimposing pictorial artwork with projected imagery. IEEE Multimedia 12, 1 (2005), 16--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bimber, O., Emmerling, A., and Klemmer, T. Embedded entertainment with smart projectors. IEEE Computer 38, 1 (2005), 16--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Bimber, O. and Iwai, D. Superimposing dynamic range. ACM Trans. on Graphics 27, 5 (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Bimber, O. and Raskar, R. Spatial augmented reality: Merging real and virtual worlds. AK Peters Ltd, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Cockburn, A., Karlson, A., and Bederson, B.B. A review of overview+detail, zooming, and focus+context interfaces. ACM Computing Surveys 41, 1 (2008), 1--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Cruz-Neira, C., Sandin, D.J., and Defanti, T.A. SurroundScreen Projection-Based Virtual Reality: The Design and Implementation of the CAVE. SIGGRAPH, (1993). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Flagg, M. and Rehg, J.M. Projector-Guided Painting. ACM UIST, (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Gibson, J.J. The Perception of the Visual World. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1950.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Henderson, J. Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7, 11 (2003).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Hou, J., Nam, Y., Peng, W., and Lee, K.M. Effects of screen size, viewing angle, and players' immersion tendencies on game experience. Computers in Human Behavior 28, 2 (2012), 617--623. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Jones, B., Sodhi, R., Campbell, R., Garnett, G., and Bailey, B.P. Build Your World and Play In It: Interacting with Surface Particles on Complex Objects. IEEE ISMAR, (2010).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Kennedy, R.S., Lane, N.E., Kevin, S., and Lilienthal, M.G. Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An Enhanced Method for Quantifying Simulator Sickness. Aviation Psychology 3, 3 (1993), 203--220.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Milgram, P., Takemura, H., Utsumi, A., and Kishino, F. Augmented Reality: A class of displays on the realityvirtuality continuum. Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies 2351, (1994).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Mine, M., Rose, D., Yang, B., Jeroen van Baar, and Grundhöfer, A. Projection-Based Augmented Reality in Disney Theme Parks. IEEE Computer 45, 7 (2012), 32--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Novy, D. and Jr., V.M.B. Infinity-by-nine. http://obm.media.mit.edu/, (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Pinhanez, C. The Everywhere Displays Projector: A Device to Create Ubiquitous Graphical Interfaces. ACM UbiComp, (2001). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Projection Mapping Central. www.projection-mapping.org. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Quirk, P., Johnson, T., Skarbez, R., Towles, H., Gyarfas, F., and Fuchs, H. RANSAC-Assisted Display Model Reconstruction for Projective Display. IEEE VR, (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Raskar, R., Welch, G., Cutts, M., Lake, A., Stesin, L., and Fuchs, H. The Office of the Future: A Unified Approach to Image-Based Modeling and Spatially Immersive Displays. ACM SIGGRAPH, (1998). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Raskar, R., Welch, G., Low, K.L.K., and Bandyopadhyay, D. Shader lamps: Animating real objects with image-based illumination. Eurographics Workshop on Rendering Techniques, (2001), 89. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Raskar, R., Ziegler, R., and Willwacher, T. Cartoon dioramas in motion. ACM NPAR, (2002), 7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Schild, J., Laviola, J.J., and Masuch, M. Understanding User Experience in Stereoscopic 3D Games. ACM CHI, (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Sekular, R. and Blake, R. Perception, 2nd Edition. 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Tan, D.S., Gergle, D., Scupelli, P., and Pausch, R. With similar visual angles, larger displays improve spatial performance. ACM CHI, (2003). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Weffers-Albu, a., De Waele, S., Hoogenstraaten, W., and Kwisthout, C. Immersive TV Viewing with Advanced Ambilight. IEEE ICCE, (2011), 753--754.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Wilson, A., Benko, H., Izadi, S., and Hilliges, O. Steerable Augmented Reality with the Beamatron. ACM UIST, (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. IllumiRoom: peripheral projected illusions for interactive experiences

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2013
      3550 pages
      ISBN:9781450318990
      DOI:10.1145/2470654

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 April 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate392of1,963submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader