skip to main content
10.1145/2470654.2466447acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Predicting postpartum changes in emotion and behavior via social media

Published:27 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

We consider social media as a promising tool for public health, focusing on the use of Twitter posts to build predictive models about the forthcoming influence of childbirth on the behavior and mood of new mothers. Using Twitter posts, we quantify postpartum changes in 376 mothers along dimensions of social engagement, emotion, social network, and linguistic style. We then construct statistical models from a training set of observations of these measures before and after the reported childbirth, to forecast significant postpartum changes in mothers. The predictive models can classify mothers who will change significantly following childbirth with an accuracy of 71%, using observations about their prenatal behavior, and as accurately as 80-83% when additionally leveraging the initial 2-3 weeks of postnatal data. The study is motivated by the opportunity to use social media to identify mothers at risk of postpartum depression, an underreported health concern among large populations, and to inform the design of low-cost, privacy-sensitive early-warning systems and intervention programs aimed at promoting wellness postpartum.

References

  1. Bagehahl-Strindlund, M. & Borjesson, K. M. (1998). Postnatal depression: A hidden illness. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 98, 272--275.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Beck, C. T. (1998). A checklist to identify women at risk for developing postpartum depression. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 27, 39--46.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Beck, C. T. (2001). Predictors of Postpartum Depression: An Update. Nursing Research, 50 (5), 275--285.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1999). Affective norms for English words (ANEW). Gainesville, FL. The NIMH Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Brubaker, J. R., Kivran-Swaine, F., Taber, L., and Hayes, G. R. (2012). Grief-Stricken in a Crowd: The language of bereavement and distress in social media. In Proc. ICWSM 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bucci, W., Freedman, N. (1981). The language of depression. Bull. Menninger Clin. 45:334--58.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Chung, C. K., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2007). The psychological functions of function words. In K. Fielder (Ed.), Social communication (pp. 343--359).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. De Choudhury, M., Counts, S., and Horvitz, E. (2013). Major Life Changes and Behavioral Markers in Social Media: Case of Childbirth. In Proc. CSCW 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Doherty, G., Coyle, D., & Sharry, J. (2012). Engagement with Online Mental Health Interventions: An Exploratory Clinical Study of a Treatment for Depression. In Proc. CHI'12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Duda, Richard O., Hart, Peter E., & Stork, David G. (2000). Pattern Classification. 2nd Edition, Wiley. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Fleming, A. S., Klein, E. and Corter, C. (1992). The Effects of a Social Support Group on Depression, Maternal Attitudes and Behavior in New Mothers. Journal of Child Psych. & Psychiatry, 33: 685--698.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Golder, S. A., & Macy, M. W. (2011). Diurnal and Seasonal Mood Vary with Work, Sleep and Daylength Across Diverse Cultures. Science. 30 Sep 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Kapoor, A., Horvitz, E. & Basu, S. (2007). Selective Supervision: Guiding Supervised Learning with Decision-Theoretic Active Learning. In Proc. IJCAI. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Kramer, A. (2010). An Unobtrusive Behavioral Model of "Gross National Happiness". In Proc. CHI 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. MacLennan, A., Wilson, D., & Taylor, A. (1996). The self-reported prevalence of postnatal depression in Australia and New Zealand. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 36, 313.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Miller, Laura J. (2002). Postpartum Depression. J. of American Med. Association (JAMA) 287 (6): 762--765.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Neuman, Y., Cohen, Y., Assaf, D., & Kedma, G. (2012). Proactive screening for depression through metaphorical and automatic text analysis. (2012). Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 56 (1), 19--25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Nielson, Forman D., Videbech, P., Hedegaard, M., Dalby Slavig, J. & Secher, N. J. (2000). Postnatal depression: identification of women at risk. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (BJOG) 107 (10): 1210--1217.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. O'Hara, M. W. (1995). Postpartum Depression: Causes and Consequences. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. O'Hara, M. W., & Swain, A. M. (1996). Rates and risks of postpartum depression - a meta-analysis. Intl. Review of Psychiatry, 8 (1), 37--54.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Oxman T. E., Rosenberg S. D., & Tucker G. J. (1982). The language of paranoia. American J. Psychiatry 139:275--82.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Paul, M. J., & Dredze, M. (2011). You are What You Tweet: Analyzing Twitter for Public Health. In Proc. ICWSM '11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Pennebaker, J. W., Mehl, M. R., and Niederhoffer, K. G. (2002). Pyschological aspects of natural language use: Our words, ourselves. Annual Review of Psychology 54: 547--477.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Ramsay, R. (1993). Postnatal depression. Lancet, 341, 1358.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Sadilek, A., Kautz, H., & Silenzio, V. (2012). Modeling Spread of Disease from Social Interactions. In Proc. ICSWM '11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Scott, K. D., Klaus, P. H., Klaus, M. H. (1999). The obstetrical and postpartum benefits of continuous support during childbirth. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 8(10):1257--64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Spera, S. P., Buhrfeind, E. D., Pennebaker, J. W. (1994). Expressive writing and coping with job loss. Acad. Manag. J. 37:722--33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Steinfeld, C., Ellison, N., Lampe, C. (2008). Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal study. J. of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29, 434--445.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Tarkka, M.-T. & Paunonen, M. (1996). Social support and its impact on mothers' experiences of childbirth. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 23: 70--75.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Weintraub, W. (1981). Verbal Behavior: Adaptation and Psychopathology. New York: Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Predicting postpartum changes in emotion and behavior via social media

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
            April 2013
            3550 pages
            ISBN:9781450318990
            DOI:10.1145/2470654

            Copyright © 2013 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 27 April 2013

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            CHI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate392of1,963submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

            Upcoming Conference

            CHI '24
            CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
            May 11 - 16, 2024
            Honolulu , HI , USA

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader