skip to main content
10.1145/2470654.2466453acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Beyond digital and physical objects: the intellectual work as a concept of interest for HCI

Published:27 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

To understand activities of personal collecting and preservation, HCI researchers have investigated why people become attached to particular objects. These studies have examined ways that people relate to physical and digital objects, observing, for example, that people tend to cherish physical objects more than digital ones. This paper proposes that the value of digital objects may inhere less in an object's identity as a particular item and more in the object's ability to provide access to an intellectual work. The work, a familiar concept in information studies and textual studies, designates a general product of intellectual creation that may be instantiated in many versions. (For example, Shakespeare's Hamlet exists in many editions and forms, which may differ in both content and carrier and yet still are all Hamlet.) The paper demonstrates how the concept of the work can extend research on the perceived value of digital objects. It also shows how a flexible definition of the work can reveal new aspects of a design situation.

References

  1. Austlit, the Australian Literature Resource. Available at http://www.austlit.edu.au/. Last accessed August 30, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. T. Clement, ed. In transition: selected poems by the Baroness Elsa von Freytag-Loringhoven. Available at: http://digital.lib.umd.edu/transition/index.jsp. Last accessed September 2, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. A. Coleman. Scientific models as works. In Works as Entities for Information Retrieval. R. Smiraglia, ed. New York: Haworth Information Press,129--160, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. C. Cutter. Rules for a dictionary catalog. 4th ed. Washington: Government Printing Office, 1904.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. P. Eggert. Where are we now with authorship and the work? Yearbook of English Studies 88--96, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. E. Folsom and K. Price. Walt Whitman Archive. Available at: http://www.whitmanarchive.org/. Last accessed September 2, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. S. Gegenbauer and E. Huang. Inspiring the design of longer-lived electronics through an understanding of personal attachment. Proceedings of ACM DIS 2012, 635--644, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. C. Golsteijn, E. van den Hoven, D. Frohlich, and A. Sellen. Toward a more cherishable digital object. Proceedings of ACM DIS 2012, 655--644, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. International Federation of Library Associations (IFLA) Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. Final Report. Munich: K.G. Saur, 1998. Available at http://www.ifla.org/publications/functionalrequirements-for-bibliographic-records. Last accessed August 28, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. H. Jung., et al. How deep is your love: deep narratives of ensoulment and heirloom status. International Journal of Design 5(1) 59--71, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. J. Kaye, et al. To have and to hold: Exploring the personal archive. Proceedings ACM CHI 2006, 275-- 284, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. D. S. Kirk and A. Sellen. On human remains: Values and practice in the home archiving of cherished objects. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 17(3): 1--43, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. M. Kirschenbaum. Mechanisms: New media and the forensic imagination. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. A. Leigh. Lucy is "enceinte": the power of an action in defining a work. In Works as Entities for Information Retrieval. R. Smiraglia, ed. New York: Haworth Information Press, 99--127, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. S. Lubetzky. Principles of cataloging. Report for U.S. Office of Education grant OE-1--7-071089--4284. Los Angeles,: UCLA Institute of Library Research, 1969.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. C. Marshall. Digital copies and a distributed notion of reference in personal archives. In Digital Media: Technological and Social Challenges of the Interactive World. M. Winget and B. Aspray, eds. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. J. McDonough, et al. Twisty little passages almost all alike: applying the FRBR model to a classic computer game. Digital Humanities Quarterly 4(2), 2010. Available at http://digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/4/2/000089/00008 9.html. Last accessed August 28, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. S. McEathron. Cartographic materials as works. In Works as Entities for Information Retrieval. R. Smiraglia, ed. New York: Haworth Information Press,181--191, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. J. McGann. A critique of modern textual criticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. J. McGann, ed. Rossetti Archive. Available at: http://www.rossettiarchive.org/. Last accessed September 2, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. OCLC. WorldCat catalog. Available at http://www.oclc.org/worldcat/default.htm. Last accessed August 31, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. W. Odom, et al. Understanding why we preserve some things and discard others in the context of interaction design. Proceedings of ACM CHI 2009, 1053--1062, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. E. O'Neill. and D. Vizine-Goetz. Bibliographic relationships: implications for the structure of the catalog. In The Conceptual Foundations of Descriptive Cataloging. E. Svenonius, ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc., 167--195, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. D. Petrelli and S. Whittaker. Family memories in the home: contrasting physical and digital mementos. Personal Ubiquitous Computing 14(2) 153--169, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. A. Renear and D. Dubin. Three of the FRBR Group 1 entities are roles not types. Proceedings of ASIST 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. R. Smiraglia. The nature of "a work": implications for the organization of knowledge. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. E. Svenonius. The intellectual foundation of information organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. G. T. Tanselle. Textual criticism and scholarly editing. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press., 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. S. Whittaker and J. Hirschberg. The character, value, and management of personal paper archives. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 8(2): 150--170, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. P. Wilson. The second objective. In The Conceptual Foundations of Descriptive Cataloging. E. Svenonius, ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc., 5--16, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. M. Yee. The concept of work for moving image materials. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 18(2): 33--40, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. M. Yee. What is a work? Part 4: cataloging theorists and a definition abstract. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 20(2): 3--24, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Beyond digital and physical objects: the intellectual work as a concept of interest for HCI

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2013
      3550 pages
      ISBN:9781450318990
      DOI:10.1145/2470654

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 April 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate392of1,963submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader