research-article

An architecture for ethical and privacy-sensitive social network experiments

Authors:

Tristan HendersonAuthors Info & Claims

ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review, Volume 40, Issue 4

Pages 90 - 95

https://doi.org/10.1145/2479942.2479954

Published: 29 April 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Social Network Sites (SNSs) are used for sharing personal data and delivering personalised services to hundreds of millions of users, and thus represent an important sector of the Digital Economy. Measuring and collecting data from SNSs is crucial for research and development of new services, but the sensitive and personal nature of these data means that great care must be taken by researchers when conducting SNS studies.

This paper presents a work-in-progress architecture for conducting experiments across multiple SNSs while acknowledging and preserving participant privacy. We evaluate the architecture by conducting an experiment using live SNS data, exploring willingness to share sensitive data with researchers. We also outline some outstanding challenges as we finalise the implementation of the architecture.

References

[1]

A. Alazzawe, A. Alazzawe, D. Wijesekera, and R. Dantu. A testbed for mobile social computing. In Proc. TridentCom, Apr. 2009.

[2]

J. Angwin and J. Valentino-Devries. Google's iPhone tracking. The Wall Street Journal, page A1, 17 Feb. 2012.

[3]

F. Ben Abdesslem, I. Parris, and T. Henderson. Reliable online social network data collection. In A. Abraham and A. Ella Hassanien, editors, Computational Social Networks: Mining and Visualization. Springer-Verlag, London, 2012.

[4]

G. Cormode, B. Krishnamurthy, and W. Willinger. A manifesto for modeling and measurement in social media. First Monday, 15(9), Sept. 2010.

[5]

M. de Leon, M. Eriksson, S. Balasubramaniam, and W. Donnelly. Creating a distributed mobile networking testbed environment - through the Living Labs approach. In Proc. TridentCom, Mar. 2006.

[6]

D. De Roure, C. Goble, S. Aleksejevs, S. Bechhofer, J. Bhagat, D. Cruickshank, P. Fisher, D. Hull, D. Michaelides, D. Newman, R. Procter, Y. Lin, and M. Poschen. Towards open science: the myExperiment approach. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 22(17):2335--2353, Dec. 2010.

Digital Library

[7]

J. Froehlich, M. Y. Chen, S. Consolvo, B. Harrison, and J. A. Landay. MyExperience: a system for in situ tracing and capturing of user feedback on mobile phones. In Proc. MobiSys, June 2007.

Digital Library

[8]

A. Halavais. Social science: Open up online research. Nature, 480(7376):174--175, Dec. 2011.

[9]

A. Iamnitchi, J. Blackburn, and N. Kourtellis. The Social Hourglass: an infrastructure for socially-aware applications and services. IEEE Internet Computing, 16(3):13--23, 2012.

Digital Library

[10]

P. G. Leon, L. F. Cranor, A. M. McDonald, and R. McGuire. Token attempt: the misrepresentation of website privacy policies through the misuse of P3P compact policy tokens. In Proc. WPES, Oct. 2010.

Digital Library

[11]

K. Lewis, J. Kaufman, M. Gonzalez, A. Wimmer, and N. Christakis. Tastes, ties, and time: A new social network dataset using Facebook.com. Social Networks, 30(4):330--342, Oct. 2008.

[12]

C. Millard and W. K. Hon. Defining 'personal data' in E-Social Science. Information, Communication & Society, 15(1):66--84, 2012.

[13]

A. Narayanan and V. Shmatikov. De-anonymizing social networks. In Proc. IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, May 2009.

Digital Library

[14]

F. Neuhaus and T. Webmoor. Agile ethics for massified research and visualization. Information, Communication & Society, 15(1):43--65, Feb. 2012.

[15]

L. Solberg. Data mining on Facebook: A free space for researchers or an IRB nightmare? University of Illinois Journal of Law, Technology & Policy, 2010(2), 2010.

[16]

J. Thom-Santelli and D. Millen. Characterizing social data sets: Why so hard to share? In Revisiting Research Ethics in the Facebook Era: Challenges in Emerging CSCW Research, Feb. 2010.

[17]

D. Waltemath, R. Adams, D. A. Beard, F. T. Bergmann, U. S. Bhalla, R. Britten, V. Chelliah, M. T. Cooling, J. Cooper, E. J. Crampin, A. Garny, S. Hoops, M. Hucka, P. Hunter, E. Klipp, C. Laibe, A. K. Miller, I. Moraru, D. Nickerson, P. Nielsen, M. Nikolski, S. Sahle, H. M. Sauro, H. Schmidt, J. L. Snoep, D. Tolle, O. Wolkenhauer, and N. Le Nov`ere. Minimum Information About a Simulation Experiment (MIASE). PLoS Computational Biology, 7(4):e1001122, Apr. 2011.

[18]

R. E. Wilson, S. D. Gosling, and L. T. Graham. A review of Facebook research in the social sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(3):203--220, May 2012.

[19]

M. Zimmer. "But the data is already public": on the ethics of research in Facebook. Ethics and Information Technology, 12(4):313--325, Dec. 2010.

Digital Library

Cited By

Mannheimer SMannheimer S(2024)Big Social Research in PracticeScaling Up: How Data Curation Can Help Address Key Issues in Qualitative Data Reuse and Big Social Research10.1007/978-3-031-49222-8_4(47-72)Online publication date: 2-Jan-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49222-8_4
Mannheimer S(2021)Data Curation Implications of Qualitative Data Reuse and Big Social ResearchJournal of eScience Librarianship10.7191/jeslib.2021.121810:4Online publication date: 10-Nov-2021
https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2021.1218
Norval CHenderson T(2019)Automating Dynamic Consent Decisions for the Processing of Social Media Data in Health ResearchJournal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics10.1177/155626461988371515:3(187-201)Online publication date: 6-Nov-2019
https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619883715
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

An architecture for ethical and privacy-sensitive social network experiments

Recommendations

Social network activity and social well-being
CHI '10: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Previous research has shown a relationship between use of social networking sites and feelings of social capital. However, most studies have relied on self-reports by college students. The goals of the current study are to (1) validate the common self-...
Digital privacy and social capital on social network sites. friends or foes?
STAST '16: Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Socio-Technical Aspects in Security and Trust

Previous¹ literature indicates that SNSs users, and especially Facebook ones, are willing to share information and consequently "sacrifice" their digital privacy in order to obtain bonding or bridging social capital. Additionally, most of the previous ...
Practices of balancing privacy and publicness in social network services
GROUP '10: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work

While social media is all about sharing content with a community, few people wish to share everything, with everyone, all the time. This means that users balance between making some things public and keeping other content private. The presented ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review

ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review Volume 40, Issue 4

March 2013

105 pages

ISSN:0163-5999

DOI:10.1145/2479942

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2013 Authors.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 29 April 2013

Published in SIGMETRICS Volume 40, Issue 4

Check for updates

Qualifiers

Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

13
Total Citations
View Citations
430
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)10
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

Reflects downloads up to 03 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Mannheimer SMannheimer S(2024)Big Social Research in PracticeScaling Up: How Data Curation Can Help Address Key Issues in Qualitative Data Reuse and Big Social Research10.1007/978-3-031-49222-8_4(47-72)Online publication date: 2-Jan-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49222-8_4
Mannheimer S(2021)Data Curation Implications of Qualitative Data Reuse and Big Social ResearchJournal of eScience Librarianship10.7191/jeslib.2021.121810:4Online publication date: 10-Nov-2021
https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2021.1218
Norval CHenderson T(2019)Automating Dynamic Consent Decisions for the Processing of Social Media Data in Health ResearchJournal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics10.1177/155626461988371515:3(187-201)Online publication date: 6-Nov-2019
https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619883715
Hutton LHenderson T(2018)Toward Reproducibility in Online Social Network ResearchIEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing10.1109/TETC.2015.24585746:1(156-167)Online publication date: Jan-2018
https://doi.org/10.1109/TETC.2015.2458574
Valente TPitts S(2017)An Appraisal of Social Network Theory and Analysis as Applied to Public Health: Challenges and OpportunitiesAnnual Review of Public Health10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-04452838:1(103-118)Online publication date: 20-Mar-2017
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044528
Zhao YYe JHenderson TNichols JMahmud JO'Donovan JConati CZancanaro M(2016)The Effect of Privacy Concerns on Privacy RecommendersProceedings of the 21st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces10.1145/2856767.2856771(218-227)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2016
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2856767.2856771
Vitak JShilton KAshktorab ZGergle DMorris MBjørn PKonstan J(2016)Beyond the Belmont PrinciplesProceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing10.1145/2818048.2820078(941-953)Online publication date: 27-Feb-2016
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2818048.2820078
Mannheimer SYoung SRossmann D(2016)On the ethics of social network research in librariesJournal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society10.1108/JICES-05-2015-001314:2(139-151)Online publication date: 9-May-2016
https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-05-2015-0013
Alim S(2015)Automated Data Extraction from Online Social Network ProfilesHuman Rights and Ethics10.4018/978-1-4666-6433-3.ch023(389-408)Online publication date: 2015
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6433-3.ch023
Hutton LHenderson TZevenbergen B(2015)Some Challenges for Ethics in Social Network ResearchProceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Ethics in Networked Systems Research10.1145/2793013.2793023(13-15)Online publication date: 21-Aug-2015
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2793013.2793023
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Issue’s Table of Contents