research-article

Challenge and creativity: using .NET gadgeteer in schools

Authors:

Scarlet Schwiderski-GroscheAuthors Info & Claims

WiPSCE '12: Proceedings of the 7th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education

Pages 90 - 100

https://doi.org/10.1145/2481449.2481473

Published: 08 November 2012 Publication History

Abstract

This paper reports on a study carried out in secondary schools in the UK with students learning to use .NET Gadgeteer, a rapid prototyping platform for building small electronic devices [32]. A case study methodology has been used. Some of the students involved in this four-month-long project had some prior background in computer programming whereas for others this was completely new. The teaching materials provided a two-phase model of learning: an instruction phase followed by a creative phase, the latter utilising a bricolage approach to learning programming [30]. The aim of the pilot was to generate an interest in building devices and stimulate creativity. The research found that the tangible nature of the .NET Gadgeteer modules helped to engage the students in becoming creative, and that students valued challenges with which they were not usually presented within the curriculum.

References

[1]

O. Astrachan, J. Cuny, C. Stephenson, and C. Wilson. The CS10K Project: Mobilizing the Community to Transform High School Computing. In Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '11, pages 85--86, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM.

Digital Library

[2]

M. Ben-Ari. Constructivism in Computer Science Education. In Proceedings of the 29th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 257--261. ACM, 1998.

Digital Library

[3]

T. Brinda, H. Puhlmann, and C. Schulte. Bridging ICT and CS - Educational Standards for Computer Science in Lower Secondary Education. Proceedings of ITICSE'09, Paris, France, July 6--9 2009.

Digital Library

[4]

L. Carter. Why Students with an Apparent Aptitude for Computer Science Don't Choose to Major in Computer Science. In Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 27--31. ACM, 2006.

Digital Library

[5]

S. Cooper, W. Dann, and R. Pausch. Alice: a 3-D Tool for Introductory Programming Concepts. J.Comput.Sci.Coll., 15(5):107--116, Apr. 2000.

Digital Library

[6]

T. Crick and S. Sentance. Computing at School: Stimulating Computing Education in the UK. In Proceedings of the 11th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research, Koli Calling '11, pages 122--123, New York, USA, 2011. ACM.

Digital Library

[7]

Q. Cutts, S. Esper, and B. Simon. Computing as the 4th R: a General Education Approach to Computing Education. In Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Computing Education Research, ICER '11, pages 133--138, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM.

Digital Library

[8]

T. Downes and D. Looker. Factors that Influence Students' Plans to Take Computing and Information Technology Subjects in Senior Secondary School. Computer Science Education, 21(2):175--199, 2011.

[9]

A. Fisher and J. Margolis. Unlocking the Clubhouse: the Carnegie Mellon Experience. SIGCSE Bulletin, 34(2):79--83, June 2002.

Digital Library

[10]

O. Hazzan, J. Gal-Ezer, and L. Blum. A Model for High School Computer Science Education: the Four Key Elements that Make It! In Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 281--285. ACM, 2008.

Digital Library

[11]

F. T. Hofstetter. Multimedia Literacy. Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Boston, 2nd edition, 1997.

Digital Library

[12]

M. S. Horn, R. J. Crouser, and M. U. Bers. Tangible Interaction and Learning: the Case for a Hybrid Approach. Personal Ubiquitous Computing, 16(4):379--389, Apr. 2012.

Digital Library

[13]

M. Kordaki, M. Miatidis, and G. Kapsampelis. A Computer Environment for Beginners' Learning of Sorting Algorithms: Design and Pilot Evaluation. Computers and Education, 51:708--723, 2008.

Digital Library

[14]

C. Lévi-Strauss, J. Weightman, and D. Weightman. The Savage Mind. University of Chicago Press, 1966.

[15]

M. Kolling. The Greenfoot Programming Environment. Transactions on Computing Education, 10(4):14:1--14:21, Nov. 2010.

Digital Library

[16]

M. MacLaurin. Kodu: End-User Programming and Design for Games. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Foundations of Digital Games, FDG '09, New York, USA, 2009. ACM.

Digital Library

[17]

J. Maloney, M. Resnick, N. Rusk, B. Silverman, and E. Eastmond. The Scratch Programming Language and Environment. Transactions on Computing Education, 10(4):16:1--16:15, Nov. 2010.

Digital Library

[18]

P. Marshall. Do Tangible Interfaces Enhance Learning? In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction, TEI '07, pages 163--170, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.

Digital Library

[19]

O. Meerbaum-Salant, M. Armoni, and M. Ben-Ari. Habits of Programming in Scratch. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Joint Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE '11, pages 168--172, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM.

Digital Library

[20]

A. Munson, B. Moskal, A. Harriger, T. Lauriski-Karriker, and D. Heersink. Computing at the High School Level: Changing What Teachers and Students Know and Believe. Computing Education, 57(2):1836--1849, Sept. 2011.

Digital Library

[21]

S. Papert. Mindstorms: Children, Computers, And Powerful Ideas. Basic Books, 1993. 92053249.

[22]

L. Pollock and T. Harvey. Combining Multiple Pedagogies to Boost Learning and Enthusiasm. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Joint Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE '11, pages 258--262, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM.

Digital Library

[23]

M. Richards, M. Petre, and A. K. Bandara. Starting with Ubicomp: Using the Senseboard to Introduce Computing. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '12, pages 583--588, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM.

Digital Library

[24]

R. Stake. The Art of Case Study Research. London, Sage, 1995.

[25]

C. Schulte and M. Knobelsdorf. Attitudes Towards Computer Science-Computing Experiences as a Starting Point and Barrier to Computer Science. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Computing Education Research, ICER '07, pages 27--38, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.

Digital Library

[26]

R. E. Stake. The Art of Case Study Research. Sage Publications, 1995. 95004979.

[27]

C. W. Starr, D. Bergman, and P. Zaubi. The Development and Implementation of a Context-Based Curricular Framework for Computer Science Education in High Schools. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, pages 283--287. ACM, 2009.

Digital Library

[28]

E. Stiller. Teaching Programming Using Bricolage. J.Comput.Sci.Coll., 24(6):35--42, June 2009.

Digital Library

[29]

The Royal Society. Shut Down or Restart? The Way Forward for Computing in UK Schools. Technical Report January 2012 DES2448, The Royal Society, 2012.

[30]

S. Turkle and S. Paper. Epistemological Pluralism and the Revaluation of the Concrete. Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 11(1):pp 3--33, 1992.

[31]

N. Villar, J. Scott, and S. Hodges. Prototyping with Microsoft .NET Gadgeteer. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, TEI '11, pages 377--380, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM.

Digital Library

[32]

N. Villar, J. Scott, S. Hodges, K. Hammill, and C. Miller. .NET Gadgeteer: A Platform for Custom Devices. Proceedings of Pervasive 2012, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2012.

Digital Library

[33]

C. Wilson, L. A. Sudol, C. Stephenson, and M. Stehlik. Running on Empty: The Failure to Teach K--12 Computer Science in the Digital Age. Technical report, CSTA, 2010.

[34]

S. Yarosh and M. Guzdial. Narrating Data Structures: the Role of Context in CS2. J.Educ.Resour.Comput., 7(4):6:1--6:20, Jan. 2008.

Digital Library

Cited By

Ranjan KEisenberg AFiedler BGreenberg JSmith TMoore E(2025)Physical Computing with Paper Playground: Exploring a Multimodal PlatformProceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3689050.3705981(1-7)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2025
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3689050.3705981
Beheshti MShah SZhang HBarnett MHira A(2024)Affordances of Technology for Sustainability-Oriented K–12 Informal Engineering EducationSustainability10.3390/su1616671916:16(6719)Online publication date: 6-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/su16166719
Vergara K(2024)A Physical Computing Workshop to Engage Girls from Low-Income BackgroundsCompanion Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces10.1145/3696762.3698039(1-3)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3696762.3698039
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Challenge and creativity: using .NET gadgeteer in schools
1. Social and professional topics
  1. Professional topics
    1. Computing education
      1. Computing education programs
        Computer science education
      2. Model curricula

Recommendations

Engaging School Students with Tangible Devices: Pilot Project with .NET Gadgeteer
LATICE '15: Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering

One of the challenges to promoting computer science in schools is to create and retain interest in programming. We describe a pilot project for primary and secondary students in Macau to introduce .NET Gadgeteer, a rapid prototyping platform for ...
Applying creativity in CS high school education: criteria, teaching example and evaluation
Koli Calling '07: Proceedings of the Seventh Baltic Sea Conference on Computing Education Research - Volume 88

This paper describes an innovative method for teaching computer science in general high school education, illustrated with the example of introductory programming. Analyzing the literature in CS education research we found that creativity is rarely ...
Developing Creativity in Computer Science Initial Teacher Education through Design Thinking
UKICER '20: United Kingdom & Ireland Computing Education Research conference.

Design thinking is a valuable component in teacher education enabling the development of creativity amongst the cohort. Studies have been developed to capture the effects of discipline specific design thinking, however design thinking amongst Computer ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

WiPSCE '12: Proceedings of the 7th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education

November 2012

168 pages

ISBN:9781450317870

DOI:10.1145/2481449

Conference Chairs:
Maria Knobelsdorf
Technische Universität Dortmund, Germany
,
Ralf Romeike
University of Potsdam, Germany

Copyright © 2012 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Universität Hamburg: Universität Hamburg

In-Cooperation

SIGCSE: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 08 November 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

WIPSCE '12

Sponsor:

Universität Hamburg

WIPSCE '12: Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education

November 8 - 9, 2012

Hamburg, Germany

Acceptance Rates

WiPSCE '12 Paper Acceptance Rate 9 of 28 submissions, 32%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 104 of 279 submissions, 37%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

23
Total Citations
View Citations
242
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)19
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Ranjan KEisenberg AFiedler BGreenberg JSmith TMoore E(2025)Physical Computing with Paper Playground: Exploring a Multimodal PlatformProceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3689050.3705981(1-7)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2025
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3689050.3705981
Beheshti MShah SZhang HBarnett MHira A(2024)Affordances of Technology for Sustainability-Oriented K–12 Informal Engineering EducationSustainability10.3390/su1616671916:16(6719)Online publication date: 6-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/su16166719
Vergara K(2024)A Physical Computing Workshop to Engage Girls from Low-Income BackgroundsCompanion Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces10.1145/3696762.3698039(1-3)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3696762.3698039
Yurdakök EKalelioğlu F(2023)The Effect of Teaching Physical Programming on Computational Thinking Skills and Self-Efficacy Perceptions Towards Computational ThinkingJournal of Educational Computing Research10.1177/0735633123122031362:3(785-815)Online publication date: 10-Dec-2023
https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331231220313
Philbin C(2023)Exploring the Potential of Artificial Intelligence Program Generators in Computer Programming Education for StudentsACM Inroads10.1145/361040614:3(30-38)Online publication date: 16-Aug-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610406
Love T(2023)Examining middle school students’ attitudes toward computing after participating in a physical computing unitInteractive Learning Environments10.1080/10494820.2023.219432632:8(3948-3967)Online publication date: 28-Mar-2023
https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2194326
Dagienė VGülbahar YGrgurina NLópez-Pernas SSaqr MApiola MStupurienė G(2023)Computing Education Research in SchoolsPast, Present and Future of Computing Education Research10.1007/978-3-031-25336-2_20(481-520)Online publication date: 18-Apr-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25336-2_20
Grillenberger M(2023)Why and How to Teach Physical Computing: Research and Practice in Computer Science Education at Secondary SchoolsTeaching Coding in K-12 Schools10.1007/978-3-031-21970-2_15(225-243)Online publication date: 28-Feb-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21970-2_15
Schulz SBerg PKnobelsdorf M(2022)Der fachdidaktische Ansatz Physical Computing und sein Einfluss auf die Schülermotivation im Informatikunterricht der SekundarstufeMotivation in unterrichtlichen fachbezogenen Lehr-Lernkontexten10.1007/978-3-658-31064-6_5(113-147)Online publication date: 9-Feb-2022
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31064-6_5
Mouza CSheridan SLavigne NPollock L(2021)Preparing undergraduate students to support K-12 computer science teaching through school-university partnerships: reflections from the fieldComputer Science Education10.1080/08993408.2021.197043533:1(3-28)Online publication date: 29-Aug-2021
https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2021.1970435
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten