skip to main content
10.1145/2482991.2483006acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesc-n-tConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The role of community in exercise: cross-cultural study of online exercise diary users

Published:29 June 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

This study investigates users of a newly launched website aimed at tracking exercise activities. The data was collected through an online questionnaire with 282 respondents. Three nationalities, Spanish, Germans and Americans, were compared, and the results show that their relation to community aspects of the service was significantly different. The Spanish showed most interest in collaboration and creation of new contacts, whereas Germans were the least interested in these activities. The finding may be explained by the differences of these national cultures along the individualism-collectivism dimension of Hofstede's cultural theory. Across the nationalities, the users were foremost motivated by using the website for promoting their individual goals in exercise.

References

  1. Ahtinen, A., Isomursu, M., Huhtala, Y., Kaasinen, J, Salminen, J., and Häkkilä, J. 2008. Tracking Outdoor Sports - User Experience Perspective. In Proceedings of Ambient Intelligence (Nuremberg, Germany, November 19--22, 2008) AmI '08, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 192--209. DOI=10.1007/978-3-540-89617-3_13 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89617-3_13 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Armstrong, A., and Hagel, J. 2000. The real value of online communities. In Lesser, E. L, Fontaine, M. A., and Slusher, J. A. (eds.) Knowledge and communities. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, MA. 85--95.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Baym, N. 2007. The new shape of online community: The example of Swedish independent music fandom. First Monday 12, 8--6, August 2007. http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1978/1853 DOI=10.5210/fm.v12i8.1978.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Baym, N. 2010. Personal Connections in the Digital Age. Polity Press, Cambridge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. boyd, d. m., and Ellison, N. B. 2007. Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), article 11. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Burke, M. and Settles, B. 2011. Plugged in to the Community: Social Motivators in Online Goal-Setting Groups. In Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Communities & Technologies (Brisbane, Australia 29 June -- 2 July 2011) C&T '11. ACM Press (2011), 1-10. DOI=10.1145/2103354.2103356 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2103354.2103356 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Consolvo, S., Everitt, K., Smith, I., and Landay, J. A. 2006. Design requirements for technologies that encourage physical activity. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. (Montréal, Québec, Canada, April 22--27, 2006) CHI '06. ACM Press (2006), 457--466. DOI=10.1145/1124772.1124840 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1124772.1124840 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Dou, X. 2011. The Influence of Cultures on SNS Usage: Comparing Mixi in Japan and Facebook in the U.S. Public Relations Journal 5, 4 (2011). http://www.prsa.org/intelligence/prjournal/documents/2011dou.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Estephan, M. 2008. Online Communities of Practice. In Knowledge about Knowledge. Knowledge Management in Organizations. The State University, New Jersey, Rutgers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Gil-Castiñeira, F., Fernández-López, A., López Bravo, C., Cid-Vieytes, N., Conde-Lagoa, D., Costa-Montenegro, E. and González-Castaño, F. J. 2011. RunWithUs: a social sports application in the ubiquitous Oulu environment. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (Beijing, China, December 07 - 09, 2011) MUM '11, ACM Press (2011), 195--204. DOI=10.1145/2107596.2107621 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2107596.2107621 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Golbeck, J. 2011. The more people I meet, the more I like my dog: A study of pet--oriented social networks on the Web. First Monday 16, 2--7, February 2011. http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2859 DOI=10.5210/fm.v16i2.2859Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Granovetter, M. S. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American journal of sociology 78, 6 (1973), 1360--1380.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Harjumaa, M., Segerståhl, K. and Oinas-Kukkonen, H. 2009. Understanding pervasive software functionality in practice: A field trial of Polar FT60. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology (Claremont, California, USA, April 26--29) Persuasive '09, ACM Press (2009), Article 2, 9 pages. DOI=10.1145/1541948.1541952 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1541948.1541952 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviours and Organizations Across Nations. Sage Publications Inc., USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture consequences: International differences in work-related values. Sage Publications Inc., USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Iriberri, A. and Leroy, G. 2009. A life-cycle perspective on online community success. ACM Comput. Surv. 41, 2 Article 11, (February 2009). DOI=10.1145/1459352.1459356 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1459352.1459356 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Ji, G. Y., Hwangbo, H., Yi, J. S, Rau, P. L. P., Fang, X., and Ling, C. 2010. The Influence of Cultural Differences on the Use of Social Network Services and the Formation of Social Capital. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 26, 11--12 (2010), 1100--1121. DOI= 10.1080/10447318.2010.516727Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Kolek, E. A., and Saunders, D. 2008. Online disclosure: An empirical examination of undergraduate Facebook profiles. NASPA Journal 45, 1 (2008), 1--25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Malinen, S., and Ojala, J. 2011. Applying the heuristic evaluation method in the evaluation of social aspects of an exercise community. In Proceedings of the Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces (Milano, Italy, June 22--25, 2011) DPPI '11, ACM Press, Article 15, 8 pages. DOI=10.1145/2347504.2347521 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2347504.2347521 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Marcus, A. User Interface Design and Culture. 2005. In Aykin N. (ed.) Usability and Internationalization of Information Technology. Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey, 51--78.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. McKenna, K. Y. A., Green, A. S., and Gleason, M. E. J. 2002. Relationship formation on the internet: what's the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues 58, 1 (2002), 9--31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Miller V. 2011. Understanding Digital Culture. Sage Publications Inc., UK. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Movescount.com -- Powered by Suunto. http://www.movescount.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Munson S. A. and Consolvo, S. 2012. Exploring goal-setting, rewards, self-monitoring, and sharing to motivate physical activity. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies of Healthcare, Pervasive Health '12, San Diego, CA, USA, 25--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Nambisan, S. 2002. Designing virtual customer environments for new product development: toward a theory. Academy of Management Review 27, 3 (2002), 392--413.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. O'Callaghan, R. 2004. Technological innovation in organizations and their ecosystems. In W. Dutton, B. Kahin, R. O'Callaghan and A. Wyckoff (eds.) Transforming Enterprise. MIT Press, Cambridge. 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Penedo, F. J. and Dahn, J. R. 2005. Exercise and well-being: a review of mental and physical health benefits associated with physical activity. Current Opinion in Psychiatry 18, 2 (2005) 189--193.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Ploderer, B., Howard, S., Thomas, P., and Reitberger, W. 2008. "Hey World, Take a Look at Me!" Appreciating the Human Body on Social Network Sites. In Proceedings of PERSUASIVE 2008, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg (2008), 245--248. DOI=10.1007/978-3-540-68504-3_23 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68504-3_23 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Ploderer, B., Howard, S. and Thomas, P. 2008. Being online, living offline: the influence of social ties over the appropriation of social network sites. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (San Diego, California, USA, November 8--12, 2008) CSCW 2008, ACM Press, 333--342. DOI=10.1145/1460563.1460618 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1460563.1460618 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Roberts, J. 2006. Limits to communities of practice. Journal of Management Studies 43, 3 (2006), 623--639.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Rosen, D., Stefanone, M. A. and Lackaff, D. 2010. Online and Offline Social Networks: Investigating Culturally-Specific Behavior and Satisfaction. In Proceedings of Hawaii International conference on System Sciences (Kauai, Hawaii, USA, January 5--8, 2010) HICSS'10, 1--10. DOI=10.1109/HICSS.2010.292 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Ryan, R. M., Frederick, C. M, Lepes, D., Rubio, N. and Sheldon, K. M. 1997. Intrinsic motivation and exercise Adherence. Int. J. Sport Psychol 28 (1997), 335--354.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Wellman B. 2001. Physical place and cyber--place: The rise of networked Individualism. International Journal for Urban and Regional Research 25 (2001), 227--252.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Wittel, A. 2001. Toward a networking sociality. Theory, culture & society 18, 6 (2001), 51--76.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The role of community in exercise: cross-cultural study of online exercise diary users

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      C&T '13: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Communities and Technologies
      June 2013
      165 pages
      ISBN:9781450321044
      DOI:10.1145/2482991

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 29 June 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      C&T '13 Paper Acceptance Rate17of58submissions,29%Overall Acceptance Rate80of183submissions,44%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader