skip to main content
10.1145/2485760.2485877acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesidcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Scripting and orchestration of collaborative inquiry in smart classrooms

Published:24 June 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper describes a doctoral research study that examines a 13-week high school physics curriculum that engaged students as a knowledge community that leveraged user-contributed content for a series of scripted inquiry tasks. The focus of the study was the smart classroom culminating activity, in which students were orchestrated in a real-time activity to collaboratively solve ill-structure physics problems using Hollywood physics as their domain. The smart classroom leveraged the physical space of the room to contextualize student interactions, to connect students with peers in ad-hoc peer-to-peer networks, and to localize cooperative and collaborative tasks. Intelligent software agents aided in the complex orchestration of students and materials based on emergent class patterns, and provided the teacher with critical cues for intervention. Large-format interactive displays provided students a space for negotiation and a representation of their collaborative knowledge construction, and for the teacher to observe individual groups' knowledge at-a-glance. This paper attempts to analyze the designed curriculum in terms of its support for a cross-contexts knowledge community and the real-time orchestration of inquiry activities within a smart classroom setting.

References

  1. Alavi, H. S., Dillenbourg, P., & Kaplan, F. 2009. Distributed Awareness for Class Orchestration. Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (pp. 211--225), Barcelona: Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Brown, A. L. 1997. Transforming schools into communities of thinking and learning about serious matters.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Dillenbourg, P., & Jermann, P. 2007. Designing integrative scripts. Scripting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 275--301.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Dourish, P. 2001. Seeking a foundation for context-aware computing. Human--Computer Interaction, 16(2-4), 229--241. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Hoadley, C. M., & Pea, R. D. 2002. Finding the ties that bind: Tools in support of a knowledge-building community. Building virtual communities: Learning and change in cyberspace, 321--353.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ishii, H. (2007). Tangible user interfaces. CHI 2006, pp. 1--17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Linn, M. C., & Eylon, B. S. (2006). Science education: Integrating views of learning and instruction. Handbook of educational psychology, 511--544.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Roschelle, J., Penuel, W. R., & Shechtman, N. (2006). Co-design of innovations with teachers: Definition and dynamics. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Learning Sciences, 606--612. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265--283.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Slotta, J. D. (2010). Evolving the classrooms of the future: The interplay of pedagogy, technology and community. In K. Makitalo-Siegl, F. Kaplan, J. Zottmann & F. Fischer (Eds.), The classroom of the future orchestrating collaborative learning spaces (pp. 215--242). Rotterdam: SensePublisher.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Slotta, J. D., & Linn, M. C. 2009. WISE Science: Web-based Inquiry in the Classroom. NY: Teachers College Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Slotta, J., & Peters, V. (2008). A blended model for knowledge communities: Embedded scaffolded inquiry.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Tissenbaum, M., & Slotta, J. D. (2012). Scripting collective inquiry in high school physics. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, pp. 118--125.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Wheeler, S., Yeomans, P., & Wheeler, D. (2008). The good, the bad and the wiki: Evaluating student-generated content for collaborative learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(6), 987--995Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Scripting and orchestration of collaborative inquiry in smart classrooms

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        IDC '13: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children
        June 2013
        687 pages
        ISBN:9781450319188
        DOI:10.1145/2485760

        Copyright © 2013 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s)

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 24 June 2013

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate172of578submissions,30%

        Upcoming Conference

        IDC '24
        Interaction Design and Children
        June 17 - 20, 2024
        Delft , Netherlands

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader