skip to main content
10.1145/2486084.2486085acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmodConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Towards a generic framework for trustworthy spatial crowdsourcing

Published:23 June 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Many studies foresee significant future growth in the number of mobile smart phone users, the phone's hardware and software features, and the broadband bandwidth. Therefore, a transformative area of research is to fully utilize this new platform for various tasks, among which the most promising is spatial crowdsourcing. Spatial crowdsourcing (SC) engages individuals, groups, and communities in the act of collecting, analyzing, and disseminating urban, social, and other spatiotemporal information. This new paradigm of data collection has shown to be useful when traditional means fail (e.g., due to disaster), are censored or do not scale in time and space.

Two major impediments to the success of spatial crowdsourcing in real-world applications are scalability and trust issues. Without scale considerations, it is impossible to develop a generic multi-campaign spatial crowdsourcing system (SC-system) that can efficiently and in real-time match many requesters' tasks to numerous workers. Without trust, the SC-system cannot evaluate the credibility of the contributed data, rendering it ineffective for replacing the traditional data collection means. In this paper, we survey and study both issues of scale and trust in spatial crowdsourcing.

References

  1. ABI Research: Mobile broadband subscriptions surpassed 271 million in 2009, March 27, 2010, URL: http://www.intomobile.com/2010/03/27/abi-research-mobile-broadband-subscriptions-surpassed-271-million-in-2009/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. http://mobithinking.com/mobile-marketing-tools/latest-mobile-stats.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. M. Ergen, Mobile Broadband - Including WiMAX and LTE, Springer, 1st edition, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. L. Kazemi and C. Shahabi, GeoCrowd: Enabling Query Answering with Spatial Crowdsourcing. In ACM SIGSPATIAL GIS, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. J. Franklin, D. Kossmann, T. Kraska, S. Ramesh, and R. Xin. Answering queries with crowdsourcing. In Proceedings of the 2011 international conference on Management of data, SIGMOD '11, pages 61--72, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. K.-T. Chen, C.-C. Wu, Y.-C. Chang, and C.-L. Lei. A Crowdsourceable QoE Evaluation Framework for Multimedia Content. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM international conference on Multimedia, MM '09, pages 491--500. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Amazon mechanical turk. http://www.mturk.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. CrowdFlower. http://www.crowdflower.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. F. Alt, A. S. Shirazi, A. Schmidt, U. Kramer, and Z. Nawaz. Location-based crowdsourcing: extending crowdsourcing to the real world. In Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries, NordiCHI '10, pages 13--22, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. University of california berkeley, 2008--2009. http://traffic.berkeley.edu/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Urban Sensing, CycleSense, http://urban.cens.ucla.edu/projects/. Center for Embedded Networked Sensing (CENS), UCLA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. B. Hull, V. Bychkovsky, Y. Zhang, K. Chen, M. Goraczko, A. Miu, E. Shih, H. Balakrishnan, and S. Madden. Cartel: a distributed mobile sensor computing system. In SenSys'06, pages 125--138, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. P. Mohan, V. N. Padmanabhan, and R. Ramjee. Nericell: rich monitoring of road and traffic conditions using mobile smartphones. In SenSys'08, pages 323--336, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Bret Hull, Vladimir Bychkovsky, Yang Zhang, Kevin Chen, Michel Goraczko, Allen Miu, Eugene Shih, Hari Balakrishnan, and Samuel Madden. Cartel: a distributed mobile sensor computing system. In SenSys'06. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. http://research.cens.ucla.edu/projects/2007/Urban_Sensing/Applications/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Y. Dong, S. S. Kanhere, C. T. Chou, and N. Bulusu. Automatic collection of fuel prices from a network of mobile cameras. In Proceedings of IEEE DCOSS, June 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. E. Paulos, R. Honicky, and E. Goodman. Sensing atmosphere. In Workshop on Sensing on Everyday Mobile Phones in Support of Participatory Research, November 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. iReport. http://www.ireport.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. S. Gaonkar, J. Li, R. R. Choudhury, L. Cox, and A. Schmidt. Micro-blog: sharing and querying content through mobile phones and social participation. In MobiSys '08, pages 174--186, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. J. Manweiler, R. Scudellari, and L. P. Cox. SMILE: Encounter-based trust for mobile social services. In Proceedings of ACM CCS 2009, November 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. L. Deng and L. P. Cox. Livecompare: grocery bargain hunting through participatory sensing. In HotMobile 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. B. Hoh, M. Gruteser, R. Herring, J. Ban, D. Work, Juan-Carlos Herrera, A. M. Bayen, M. Annavaram, Q. Jacobson, Virtual trip lines for distributed privacy-preserving traffic monitoring. In Proceeding of the 6th international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services, June 17--20, 2008, Breckenridge, CO, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. A. Dua, N. Bulusu, W.-C. Feng, and W. Hu. Towards trustworthy participatory sensing. In HotSec'09, pages 8--8. USENIX Association, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. P. Gilbert, L. P. Cox, J. Jung, and D. Wetherall. Toward trustworthy mobile sensing. In HotMobile '10, pages 31--36, Annapolis, Maryland, 2010. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. J. Mullins, How crowdsourcing is helping in Haiti, January 27, 2010, URL: http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20527453.600-how-crowdsourcing-is-helping-in-haiti.html/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. A. Marcus, E. Wu, S. Madden, R. C. Miller: Crowdsourced Databases: Query Processing with People. CIDR 2011: 211--214Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Parameswaran, A. G., Garcia-Molina, H., Park, H., Polyzotis, N., Ramesh, A., & Widom, J. (2012, May). Crowdscreen: Algorithms for filtering data with humans. In Proceedings of the 2012 international conference on Management of Data (pp. 361--372). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Marcus, A., Wu, E., Karger, D., Madden, S., & Miller, R. (2011). Human-powered sorts and joins. In Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 5(1), 13--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Demartini, G., Kraska, B. T. T., & Franklin, M. J.. CrowdQ: Crowdsourced Query Understanding. CIDR 2013Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhao, Z., Ng, W., & Zhang, Z. (2013, March). CrowdSeed: query processing on microblogs. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Extending Database Technology (pp. 729--732). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Xuan Liu, Meiyu Lu, Beng Chin Ooi, Yanyan Shen, Sai Wu, Meihui Zhang: CDAS: A Crowdsourcing Data Analytics System. PVLDB 2012, 5(10). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Wang, J., Kraska, T., Franklin, M. J., & Feng, J. (2012). Crowder: Crowdsourcing entity resolution. In Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. oDesk. http://www.odesk.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Musthag, M., & Ganesan, D. (2013). Labor Dynamics in a Mobile Micro-Task Market.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Benouaret, K., Valliyur-Ramalingam, R., & Charoy, F. (2013). CrowdSC: Building Smart Cities with Large Scale Citizen Participation. Research Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Sadilek, A., Krumm, J., & Horvitz, E. (2013). Crowdphysics: Planned and Opportunistic Crowdsourcing for Physical Tasks. SEA, 21(10,424), 125--620.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Goodchild, M. F., & Glennon, J. A. (2010). Crowdsourcing geographic information for disaster response: a research frontier. International Journal of Digital Earth, 3(3), 231--241.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Brabham, D. C. (2009). Crowdsourcing the public participation process for planning projects. Planning Theory, 8(3), 242--262.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Bozzon, A., Brambilla, M., & Ceri, S. (2012, April). Answering search queries with crowdsearcher. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web (pp. 1009--1018). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis, Foster Provost, and Jing Wang. Quality management on amazon mechanical turk. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD Workshop on Human Computation, HCOMP '10, pages 64--67,Washington DC, 2010. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Vikas C. Raykar, Shipeng Yu, Linda H. Zhao, Gerardo Hermosillo Valadez, Charles Florin, Luca Bogoni, and Linda Moy. Learning from crowds. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11:1297--1322, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Alban Galland, Serge Abiteboul, Am'elie Marian, and Pierre Senellart. Corroborating information from disagreeing views. In Proceedings of the third ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, WSDM '10, pages 131--140, New York, New York, USA, 2010. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Vuurens, J., de Vries, A. P., & Eickhoff, C. (2011). How much spam can you take? an analysis of crowdsourcing results to increase accuracy. In Proc. ACM SIGIR Workshop on Crowdsourcing for Information Retrieval (CIR'11) (pp. 21--26).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Caleb Chen Cao, Jieying She, Yongxin Tong, and Lei Chen. Whom to ask? jury selection for decision making tasks on micro-blog services. PVLDB, 5(11):1495--1506, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Tian, Y., & Zhu, J. (2012, August). Learning from Crowds in the Presence of Schools of Thought. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 226--234). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Mashhadi, A. J., Capra, L. (2011, September). Quality control for real-time ubiquitous crowdsourcing. In Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on Ubiquitous crowdsouring (pp. 5--8). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Ramesh, A., Parameswaran, A., Garcia-Molina, H., & Polyzotis, N. (2012). Identifying Reliable Workers Swiftly. Infolab Technical Report. Stanford University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Joglekar, M., Garcia-Molina, H., & Parameswaran, A. (2012). Evaluating the crowd with confidence. Infolab Technical Report. Stanford University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Towards a generic framework for trustworthy spatial crowdsourcing

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MobiDE '13: Proceedings of the 12th International ACM Workshop on Data Engineering for Wireless and Mobile Acess
      June 2013
      48 pages
      ISBN:9781450321976
      DOI:10.1145/2486084

      Copyright © 2013 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s)

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 June 2013

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate23of59submissions,39%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader