skip to main content
10.1145/2487788.2487803acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Inferring audience partisanship for YouTube videos

Published: 13 May 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Political campaigning and the corresponding advertisement money are increasingly moving online. Some analysts claim that the U.S.~elections were partly won through a smart use of (i) targeted advertising and (ii) social media. But what type of information do politicized users consume online? And, the other way around, for a given content, e.g. a YouTube video, is it possible to predict its political audience? To address this latter question, we present a large scale study of anonymous YouTube video consumption of politicized users, where political orientation is derived from visits to "beacon pages", namely, political partisan blogs. Though our techniques are relevant for targeted political advertising, we believe that our findings are also of a wider interest.

References

[1]
Y. Benkler and A. Shaw. A tale of two blogospheres: Discursive practices on the left and right. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(4):459--487, 2012.
[2]
N. L. Center and Z. International. The zogby/lear center survey on politics and entertainment, 2008.
[3]
M. Efron. The liberal media and right-wing conspiracies: using cocitation information to estimate political orientation in web documents. In CIKM, pages 390--398, 2004.
[4]
M. Gamon, S. Basu, D. Belenko, D. Fisher, M. Hurst, and A. König. Blews: Using blogs to provide context for news articles. In ICWSM, pages 60--67, 2008.
[5]
K. Hart. The 2012 tech primary. Politico, January 2012.
[6]
S. Issenberg. The definitive story of how president obama mined voter data to win a second term. MIT Technology Review, 2013.
[7]
M. Kosinski, D. Stillwell, and T. Graepel. Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior. PNAS, 2013.
[8]
D. Kreiss. Yes we can (profile you) -- a brief primer on campaigns and political data. Stanford Law Review, February 2012.
[9]
M. Laver, K. Benoit, and J. Garry. Extracting policy positions from political texts using words as data. APSR, 97(02):311--331, 2003.
[10]
E. Lawrence, J. Sides, and H. Farrell. Self-Segregation or deliberation? blog readership, participation, and polarization in american politics. POP, 8(01):141--157, 2010.
[11]
R. Malouf and T. Mullen. Taking sides: user classification for informal online political discourse. Internet Research, 18:177--190, 2008.
[12]
J. W. Peters. As viewing habits change, political ads switch screens. N.Y. Times, April 2012.
[13]
E. Schultheis. Romney counters obama's barnard speech with targeted web ads. Politico, May 2012.
[14]
J. Slapin and S. Proksch. A scaling model for estimating time-series party positions from texts. AJPS, 52(3):705--722, 2008.
[15]
D. X. Zhou, P. Resnick, and Q. Mei. Classifying the political leaning of news articles and users from user votes. In ICWSM, 2011.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Using User-Generated YouTube Videos to Understand Unguided Interactions with Robots in Public PlacesACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/355028012:1(1-40)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2022
  • (2021)Node classification over bipartite graphs through projectionMachine Language10.1007/s10994-020-05898-0110:1(37-87)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2021
  • (2019)Underneath the SkinProceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3290605.3300444(1-12)Online publication date: 2-May-2019
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
WWW '13 Companion: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web
May 2013
1636 pages
ISBN:9781450320382
DOI:10.1145/2487788
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

  • NICBR: Nucleo de Informatcao e Coordenacao do Ponto BR
  • CGIBR: Comite Gestor da Internet no Brazil

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 May 2013

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. audience prediction
  2. partisan blogs
  3. political polarization
  4. youtube

Qualifiers

  • Poster

Conference

WWW '13
Sponsor:
  • NICBR
  • CGIBR
WWW '13: 22nd International World Wide Web Conference
May 13 - 17, 2013
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Acceptance Rates

WWW '13 Companion Paper Acceptance Rate 831 of 1,250 submissions, 66%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)11
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 02 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Using User-Generated YouTube Videos to Understand Unguided Interactions with Robots in Public PlacesACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/355028012:1(1-40)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2022
  • (2021)Node classification over bipartite graphs through projectionMachine Language10.1007/s10994-020-05898-0110:1(37-87)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2021
  • (2019)Underneath the SkinProceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3290605.3300444(1-12)Online publication date: 2-May-2019
  • (2019)Retail credit scoring using fine‐grained payment dataJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society)10.1111/rssa.12469182:4(1227-1246)Online publication date: 24-May-2019
  • (2018)What does your Facebook profile reveal about your creditworthiness? Using alternative data for microfinanceJournal of the Operational Research Society10.1080/01605682.2018.143440270:3(353-363)Online publication date: 25-Apr-2018
  • (2017)Exploring “User,” “Video,” and (Pseudo) Multi-Mode Networks on YouTube with NodeXLSocial Media Data Extraction and Content Analysis10.4018/978-1-5225-0648-5.ch009(242-295)Online publication date: 2017
  • (2017)Bankruptcy prediction for SMEs using relational dataDecision Support Systems10.1016/j.dss.2017.07.004102:C(69-81)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2017
  • (2014)Who watches (and shares) what on youtube? and when?Proceedings of the 7th ACM international conference on Web search and data mining10.1145/2556195.2566588(593-602)Online publication date: 24-Feb-2014
  • (2013)PLEAD 2013Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Information & Knowledge Management10.1145/2505515.2505813(2553-2554)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2013

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media