skip to main content
10.1145/2487788.2487836acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Co-training and visualizing sentiment evolvement for tweet events

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 May 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Sentiment classification on tweet events attracts more interest in recent years. The large tweet stream stops people reading the whole classified list to understand the insights. We employ the co-training framework in the proposed algorithm. Features are split into text view features and non-text view features. Two Random Forest (RF) classifiers are trained with the common labeled data on the two views of features separately. Then for each specific event, they collaboratively and periodically train together to boost the classification performance. At last, we propose a "river" graph to visualize the intensity and evolvement of sentiment on an event, which demonstrates the intensity by both color gradient and opinion labels, and the ups and downs of confronting opinions by the river flow. Comparing with the well-known sentiment classifiers, our algorithm achieves consistent increases in accuracy on the tweet events from TREC 2011 Microblogging and our database. The visualization helps people recognize turning and bursting patterns, and predict sentiment trend in an intuitive way.

References

  1. Godbole, N., Srinivasaiah, M., Skiena, S. 2007. Large Scale Sentiment Analysis for News and Blogs. In Proc. of CWSM'2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Thelwall, M., Buckley, K. and Paltoglou, G. 2011. Sentiment in Twitter events. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. Volume 62, Issue 2. pp. 406--418 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Nguyen, L. T, Wu, P., Chan, W., Peng, W., Zhang, Y. 2012. Predicting Collective Sentiment Dynamics from Time-series Social Media. In Proc. of WISDOM. p.6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Wu, Y., Wei, F., Liu, S., Au, N., Cui, W., Zhou, H. and Qu, H. 2010. OpinionSeer: Interactive Visualization of Hotel Customer Feedback, IEEE Trans. on VCG, Vol. 16, No. 6, pp. 1109--1118. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Hao, M., Rohrdantz, C., Janetzko, H., Dayal, U. 2011. Visual Sentiment Analysis on Twitter Data Streams. IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology, pages 275--276.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Blum, A. and Mitchell, T. 1998.Combining labeled and unlabeled data with co-training. In Proc. of COLT. pp. 92--100. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Turney, P. D. 2002. Thumbs Up or Thumbs Down? Semantic Orientation Applied to Unsupervised Classification of Reviews. In Proc. of ACL. pp. 417--424 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Strapparava, C. and Valitutti, A. 2004. Wordnet-affect: an affective extension of wordnet. In Proc. of LREC. pp. 1083--1086.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Co-training and visualizing sentiment evolvement for tweet events

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      WWW '13 Companion: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web
      May 2013
      1636 pages
      ISBN:9781450320382
      DOI:10.1145/2487788

      Copyright © 2013 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s)

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 May 2013

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Acceptance Rates

      WWW '13 Companion Paper Acceptance Rate831of1,250submissions,66%Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader