skip to main content
10.1145/2487788.2488090acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Users' satisfaction in recommendation systems for groups: an approach based on noncooperative games

Published:13 May 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

A major difficulty in a recommendation system for groups is to use a group aggregation strategy to ensure, among other things, the maximization of the average satisfaction of group members. This paper presents an approach based on the theory of noncooperative games to solve this problem. While group members can be seen as game players, the items for potential recommendation for the group comprise the set of possible actions. Achieving group satisfaction as a whole becomes, then, a problem of finding the Nash equilibrium. Experiments with a MovieLens dataset and a function of arithmetic mean to compute the prediction of group satisfaction for the generated recommendation have shown statistically significant results when compared to state-of-the-art aggregation strategies, in particular, when evaluation among group members are more heterogeneous. The feasibility of this unique approach is shown by the development of an application for Facebook, which recommends movies to groups of friends.

References

  1. G. Adomavicius and A. Tuzhilin. Toward the next generation of recommender systems: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 17(6):734--749, June 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. G. Adomavicius and A. Tuzhilin. Context-Aware Recommender Systems. In F. Ricci, L. Rokach, B. Shapira, and P. B. Kantor, editors, Recommender Systems Handbook. Springer US, Boston, MA, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. K. J. Arrow. Social Choice and Individual Values. Wiley, 2nd edition, 1963.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. P. Bekkerman, S. Kraus, and F. Ricci. Applying cooperative negotiation methodology to group recommendation problem. In A. Felfernig and M. Zanker, editors, Proceedings of Workshop on Recommender Systems in 17th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2006), pages 72--75, Riva del Garda, Italy, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. L. Boratto and S. Carta. State-of-the-Art in Group Recommendation and New Approaches for Automatic Identification of Groups. In A. Soro, E. Vargiu, G. Armano, and G. Paddeu, editors, Information Retrieval and Mining in Distributed Environments, volume 324 of Studies in Computational Intelligence, pages 1--20. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. R. Burke. Hybrid Recommender Systems: Survey and Experiments. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 12(4):331--370, Nov. 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. L. A. M. C. Carvalho and H. T. Macedo. Computando o Equilíbrio de Nash para estratégias de agregação na recomendação de itens para grupos de usuários. Curitiba, Brasil, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. S. C. Cazella, M. A. S. N. Nunes, and E. B. Reategui. A Ciência do Palpite: Estado da Arte em Sistemas de Recomendação. In Jornada de Atualização de Informática - JAI 2010 - CSBC, pages 161--216, Rio de Janeiro, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. B. W. Dasarathy. Nearest Neighbor (NN). Los Alamitos, CA, 1991. IEEE Computer Society Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. I. Garcia, L. Sebastia, S. Pajares, and E. Onaindia. Approaches to Preference Elicitation for Group Recommendation. In B. Murgante, O. Gervasi, A. Iglesias, D. Taniar, and B. O. Apduhan, editors, Computational Science and Its Applications - ICCSA 2011, volume 6786 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 547--561. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. J. L. Herlocker, J. A. Konstan, L. G. Terveen, and J. T. Riedl. Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 22(1):5--53, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. R. Hu and P. Pu. Using Personality Information in Collaborative Filtering for New Users. In 2nd ACM RecSys'10 Workshop on Recommender Systems and the Social Web, pages 17--24, New York, NY, USA, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. A. Jameson and B. Smyth. Recommendation to Groups. In P. Brusilovsky, A. Kobsa, and W. Nejdl, editors, The Adaptive Web (LNCS), volume 4321 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 596--627. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. B. MacQueen. Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In Proceedings of the Fifth Symposium on Math, Statistics, and Probability, pages 281--297. University of California Press, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. J. Masthoff. Group Modeling: Selecting a Sequence of Television Items to Suit a Group of Viewers. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 14(1):37--85, Feb. 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. J. Masthoff. Group recommender systems: combining individual models. In F. Ricci, L. Rokach, B. Shapira, and P. B. Kantor, editors, Recommender Systems Handbook, page 677. Springer US, Boston, MA, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. R. D. McKelvey, A. M. McLennan, and T. L. Turocy. Gambit: Software Tools for Game Theory, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. M. A. S. N. Nunes. Recommender Systems based on Personality Traits: Could human psychological aspects influence the computer decision-making process?, volume 1. VDM Verlag Dr. Müller, Berlin, 1 edition, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. M. O'Connor, D. Cosley, J. A. Konstan, and J. T. Riedl. PolyLens: A Recommender System for Groups of Users. In W. Prinz, M. Jarke, Y. Rogers, K. Schmidt, and V. Wulf, editors, ECSCW 2001, pages 199--218. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. M. J. Pazzani and D. Billsus. Content-Based Recommendation Systems. In P. Brusilovsky, A. Kobsa, and W. Nejdl, editors, The Adaptive Web, volume 4321 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. D. M. Pennock, E. Horvitz, and C. L. Giles. Social choice theory and recommender systems: Analysis of the axiomatic foundations of collaborative filtering. In Proc. 17th AAAI, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. P. Resnick and H. R. Varian. Recommender systems. Communications of the ACM, 40(3):56--58, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. A. Sen. Rationality and Social Choice. In Handbook of Mathematical Economics, volume 3. Elsevier Science, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. C. Senot, D. Kostadinov, M. Bouzid, J. Picault, and A. Aghasaryan. Evaluation of Group Profiling Strategies. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 2728 --2733, Barcelona, 2011. the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. C. Senot, D. Kostadinov, M. Bouzid, J. Picault, A. Aghasaryan, and C. Bernier. Analysis of Strategies for Building Group Profiles. In P. Bra, A. Kobsa, and D. Chin, editors, User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, volume 6075 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 40--51. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Z. Yu, X. Zhou, Y. Hao, and J. Gu. TV Program Recommendation for Multiple Viewers Based on user Profile Merging. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 16(1):63--82, June 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Users' satisfaction in recommendation systems for groups: an approach based on noncooperative games

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        WWW '13 Companion: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web
        May 2013
        1636 pages
        ISBN:9781450320382
        DOI:10.1145/2487788

        Copyright © 2013 Copyright is held by the International World Wide Web Conference Committee (IW3C2).

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 13 May 2013

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        WWW '13 Companion Paper Acceptance Rate831of1,250submissions,66%Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader