research-article

On the quality and value of information in sensor networks

Authors:

Chatschik Bisdikian,

Lance M. Kaplan,

Mani B. SrivastavaAuthors Info & Claims

ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN), Volume 9, Issue 4

Article No.: 48, Pages 1 - 26

https://doi.org/10.1145/2489253.2489265

Published: 23 July 2013 Publication History

Abstract

The increasing use of sensor-derived information from planned, ad-hoc, and/or opportunistically deployed sensor networks provides enhanced visibility to everyday activities and processes, enabling fast-paced data-to-decision in personal, social, civilian, military, and business contexts. The value that information brings to this visibility and ensuing decisions depends on the quality characteristics of the information gathered. In this article, we highlight, refine, and extend upon our past work in the areas of quality and value of information (QoI and VoI) for sensor networks. Specifically, we present and elaborate on our two-layer QoI/VoI definition, where the former relates to context-independent aspects and the latter to context-dependent aspects of an information product. Then, we refine our taxonomy of pertinent QoI and VoI attributes anchored around a simple ontological relationship between the two. Finally, we introduce a framework for scoring and ranking information products based on their VoI attributes using the analytic hierarchy multicriteria decision process, illustrated via a simple example.

References

[1]

Akyildiz, I. F., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., and Cayirci, E. 2002. A survey on sensor networks. IEEE Commun. 40, 8, 102--114.

Digital Library

[2]

Al-Karaki, J. N. and Kamal, A. E. 2004. Routing techniques in wireless sensor networks: A survey. IEEE Wireless Commun. 11, 6, 6--28.

Digital Library

[3]

Alonso, J. A. and Lamata, M. T. 2006. Consistency in the analytic hierarchy process: A new approach. In. J. Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Syst. 14, 4, 445--459.

[4]

Bauer, R. A., Collar, E., and Tang, V. 1992. The Silverlake Project: Transformation at IBM. Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.

Digital Library

[5]

Bennett, M. and Waltz, E. 2007. Counterdeception Principles and Applications for National Security. Artech House, Boston, MA.

[6]

Bisdikian, C., Branch, J., Leung, K. K., and Young, R. I. 2009a. A letter soup for the quality of information in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Information Quality and Quality of Service Workshop (IQ2S'09).

Digital Library

[7]

Bisdikian, C., Kaplan, L. M., Srivastava, M. B., Thornley, D. J., Verma, D., and Young, R. I. 2009b. Building principles for a quality of information specification for sensor information. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Information Fusion (Fusion'09).

[8]

Blasch, E., Valin, P., and Bosse, E. 2010. Measures of effectiveness for high-level fusion. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Information Fusion (Fusion'10).

[9]

Blasch, E. P., Pribilski, M., Daughtery, B., Roscoe, B., and Gunsett, J. 2004. Fusion metrics for dynamic situation analysis. In Proceedings of the SPIE, Signal Processing, Sensor Fusion, and Target Recognition XIII, I. Kadar, Ed. Vol. 5429.

[10]

Burke, J., Estrin, D., Hansen, M., Parker, A., Ramanathan, N., Reddy, S., and Srivastava, M. B. 2006. Participatory sensing. In Proceeding of the World Sensor Web Workshop.

[11]

Chakraborty, S., Raghavan, K. R., Srivastava, M., Bisdikian, C., and Kaplan, L. M. 2012. Balancing value and risk in information sharing through obfuscation. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Information Fusion (Fusion'12).

[12]

Chen, L., Szymanski, B. K., and Branch, J. W. 2008. Quality-driven congestion control for target tracking in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Quality of Information for Sensor Networks (QoISN'08). 766--771.

[13]

Ehikioya, S. A. 1999. A characterization of information quality using fuzzy logic. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society (NAFIPS), R. N. Dave and T. Sudkamp, Eds. 635--639.

[14]

English, L. P. 1999. Improving Data Warehouse and Business Information Quality: Methods for Reducing Costs and Increasing Profits. Wiley. Hoboken, NJ.

Digital Library

[15]

English, L. P. 2009. Information Quality Applied: Best Practices for Improving Business Information, Processes and Systems. Wiley. Hoboken, NJ.

Digital Library

[16]

Fasolo, E., Rossi, M., Widmer, J., and Zorzi, M. 2007. In-network aggregation techniques for wireless sensor networks: A survey. IEEE Wireless Commun. 14, 2, 70--87.

Digital Library

[17]

Fowler, M. 1996. Analysis Patterns: Reusable Object Models. Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA.

Digital Library

[18]

Gershenfeld, N., Krikorian, R., and Cohen, D. 2004. The Internet of Things. Sci. Am.

[19]

Geyik, S. C., Shah, S. Y., Szymanski, B. K., Das, S., and Zerfos, P. 2012. Market mechanisms for resource allocation in pervasive sensor applications. Pervasive Mobile Comput. 8, 3, 346--357.

Digital Library

[20]

Ghosh, A. and Das, S. K. 2008. Coverage and connectivity issues in wireless sensor networks: A survey. Pervasive Mobile Comput.

Digital Library

[21]

Gilmore, S. and Hillston, J. 1994. The PEPA workbench: A tool to support a process algebra-based approach to performance modelling. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Modelling Techniques and Tools for Computer Performance Evaluation, G. Haring and G. Kotsis, Eds. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 794. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidalberg, 353--368.

Digital Library

[22]

Hart, J. K. and Martinez, K. 2006. Environmental sensor networks: A revolution in the earth system science&quest; Earth-Science Rev. 78, 177--191.

[23]

Hossain, M. A., Atrey, P. K., and Saddik, A. E. 2007. Modeling quality of information in multi-sensor surveillance systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE Data Engineering Workshop on Ambient Intelligence, Media, and Sensing. 11--18.

Digital Library

[24]

Howard, R. A. 1966. Information value theory. IEEE Trans. Syst. Sci. Cybernet. 2, 1, 22--26.

[25]

Howard, R. A. 1968. The foundations of decision analysis. IEEE Trans. Syst. Sci. Cybernet. 4, 3, 211--219.

[26]

Hubbard, D. W. 2007. How to Measure Anything: Finding the Value of “Intangibles” in Business. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.

[27]

International Telecommunication Union. 2008. Rec. ITU-T E.800: Quality of telecommunication services: Concepts, models, objectives and dependability planning; Terms and definitions related to the quality of telecommunication services.

[28]

Johnson, M. E. and Chang, K. C. 2005. Quality of information for data fusion in net centric publish and subscribe architectures. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Information Fusion (Fusion'05).

[29]

Knight, S.-A. 2007. User perceptions of information quality in world wide Web information retrieval behavior. Ph.D. Dissutation, Edith Cowan University, Joondahop, Australia.

[30]

Liu, C. H., Bisdikian, C., Branch, J. W., and Leung, K. K. 2010. QoI-aware wireless sensor network management for dynamic multi-task operations. In Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON'10).

[31]

Llinas, J. 2001. Assessing the Performance of Multisensor Fusion Processes. In Handbook of Multisensor Data Fusion, D. L. Hall and J. Llinas, Eds., Chapter 20, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

[32]

Open Geospatial Consortium Inc., 2007. OpenGIS sensor Model Language (SensorML) implementation specification. M. Bots and A. Robin, Ed. Ref. Num. Doc: OGC 07-000, ver. 1.0.0.

[33]

Open Geospatial Consortium Inc. 2010. Geographic information: Observations and measurements. S. Cox, Ed. OpenGIS Proj. Doc: OGC 10-004r3 and ISO 19156.

[34]

Rogova, G. L. and Bosse, E. 2010. Information quality in information fusion. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Information Fusion (Fusion'10).

[35]

Saaty, T. L. 1990. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. Euro. J. Oper. Res. 48, 1, 9--26.

[36]

Saaty, T. L. 2008a. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Services Sci. 1, 1, 83--98.

[37]

Saaty, T. L. 2008b. Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making why pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of intangible factors the analytic hierarchy/network process. Rev. R. Acad. Cien. Serie A. Mat. 102, 2, 251--318.

[38]

Sachidananda, V., Khelil, A., and Suri, N. 2010. Quality of information in wireless sensor networks: A survey. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Information Quality (ICIQ'10). 193--207.

[39]

Sheth, A., Henson, C., and Sahoo, S. S. 2008. Semantic Sensor Web. IEEE Internet Comput.

Digital Library

[40]

Shiraishi, S., Obata, T., and Daigo, M. 1998. Properties of a positive reciprocal matrix and their applications to ahp. J. Oper. Res. Soc. Japan 41, 3, 404--414.

[41]

Sowa, J. F. and Zachman, J. A. 1992. Extending and formalizing the framework for information systems architecture. IBM Syst. J. 31, 3, 590--616.

Digital Library

[42]

Stankiewicz, R., Cholda, P., and Jajszczyk, A. 2011. QoX: What is it really&quest; IEEE Commun. Mag.

[43]

Sun, Z., Liu, C. H., Bisdikian, C., Branch, J. W., and Yang, B. 2012. QoI-aware energy management in Internet-of-things sensory environments. In Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON'12).

[44]

Thornley, D. J., Gillies, D. F., and Bisdikian, C. 2009a. A stochastic process algebraic abstraction of detection evidence fusion in tactical sensor networks. In Proceedings of the SPIE, Modeling and Simulation for Military Operations IV, D. A. Trevisani, Ed. Vol. 7348.

[45]

Thornley, D. J., Young, R. J., and Richardson, J. P. 2009b. Toward mission-specific service utility estimation using analytic stochastic process models. In Proceedings of the SPIE, Intelligent Sensing, Situation Management, Impact Assessment, and Cyber-Sensing, J. F. Buford, S. Mott, and G. Jakobson, Eds. Vol. 7352.

[46]

Tychogiorgos, G. and Bisdikian, C. 2011. Selecting relevant sensor providers for meeting “your” quality information needs. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Mobile Data Management (MDM'11).

Digital Library

[47]

Waltz, E. 2003. Knowledge Management in the Intelligence Enterprise. Artech House, Boston, MA.

Digital Library

[48]

Waltz, E. and Llinas, J. 1990. Multisensor Data Fusion. Artech House, Boston, MA.

Digital Library

[49]

Wang, L. and Xiao, Y. 2006. A survey of energy-efficient scheduling mechanisms in sensor networks. Mobile Netw. Appl. 11, 723--74.

Digital Library

[50]

Wang, R. Y. and Strong, D. M. 1996. Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. J. Manage. Inform. Syst.

Digital Library

[51]

Wei, W., He, T., Bisdikian, C., Goeckel, D., and Towsley, D. 2010. Target tracking with packet delays and losses--qoi amid latencies and missing data. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Information Quality and Quality of Service for Pervasive Computing (IQ2S'10).

[52]

West, M. 2008. ISO 8000, standards for data and information. In Data Management & Information Quality. London, U.K.

[53]

Zahedi, S., Srivastava, M. B., Bisdikian, C., and Kaplan, L. M. 2010. Quality tradeoffs in object tracking with duty-cycled sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 31st IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium (RTSS'10).

Digital Library

Cited By

Blasch E(2024)Value-based sensor and information fusionSignal Processing, Sensor/Information Fusion, and Target Recognition XXXIII10.1117/12.3014177(18)Online publication date: 7-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3014177
Wang WCheng NLi MYang TZhou CLi CChen F(2024)Value Matters: A Novel Value of Information-Based Resource Scheduling Method for CAVsIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology10.1109/TVT.2024.335511973:6(8720-8735)Online publication date: Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2024.3355119
Agheli PPappas NKountouris M(2024)Semantic Filtering and Source Coding in Distributed Wireless Monitoring SystemsIEEE Transactions on Communications10.1109/TCOMM.2024.336295172:6(3290-3304)Online publication date: Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2024.3362951
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

On the quality and value of information in sensor networks
1. Networks
  1. Network architectures

Recommendations

Selecting Relevant Sensor Providers for Meeting "Your" Quality Information Needs
MDM '11: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE 12th International Conference on Mobile Data Management - Volume 01

The accelerated, on-demand deployment of sensor networks raises the challenge of selecting the providers supplying the most "relevant" sensory information to a user's needs. This paper considers the spatial relevancy of information provided that ...
Quantitative Approaches to Representing the Value of Information within the Intelligence Cycle

The authors propose that valuation of information metrics developed near the end of the intelligence cycle are appropriate supplemental metrics for national security intelligence. Existing information and decision theoretic frameworks are often either ...
Modeling Value of Information in remote sensing from correlated sources
Abstract
This paper investigates data correlation in remote sensing networks and how it can be characterized through diverse models quantifying the Value of Information (VoI), a metric that describes how informative the data transmitted by the sensors ...
Highlights
- In scenarios with multiple sources, their correlation benefits the Age of Information.
- When correlation is considered, we better speak of Value of Information (VoI).
- To track it, we exploit the Markov property of the resulting ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks

ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks Volume 9, Issue 4

July 2013

523 pages

ISSN:1550-4859

EISSN:1550-4867

DOI:10.1145/2489253

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2013 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Journal Family

ACM Journals for the Design of Smart and Connected Systems

Publication History

Published: 23 July 2013

Accepted: 01 October 2012

Revised: 01 July 2012

Received: 01 January 2012

Published in TOSN Volume 9, Issue 4

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed

Funding Sources

U.K. Ministry of Defence under Agreement W911NF-06-3-0001
U.S. Army Research Laboratory

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

111
Total Citations
View Citations
1,530
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)49
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8

Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Blasch E(2024)Value-based sensor and information fusionSignal Processing, Sensor/Information Fusion, and Target Recognition XXXIII10.1117/12.3014177(18)Online publication date: 7-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3014177
Wang WCheng NLi MYang TZhou CLi CChen F(2024)Value Matters: A Novel Value of Information-Based Resource Scheduling Method for CAVsIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology10.1109/TVT.2024.335511973:6(8720-8735)Online publication date: Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2024.3355119
Agheli PPappas NKountouris M(2024)Semantic Filtering and Source Coding in Distributed Wireless Monitoring SystemsIEEE Transactions on Communications10.1109/TCOMM.2024.336295172:6(3290-3304)Online publication date: Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2024.3362951
Salimnejad MKountouris MPappas N(2024)Real-Time Reconstruction of Markov Sources and Remote Actuation Over Wireless ChannelsIEEE Transactions on Communications10.1109/TCOMM.2024.335645672:5(2701-2715)Online publication date: May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2024.3356456
Rogova GCohn JSentz K(2024)Knowledge Ontology of Information Quality for Information Fusion2024 IEEE Conference on Cognitive and Computational Aspects of Situation Management (CogSIMA)10.1109/CogSIMA61085.2024.10553970(39-46)Online publication date: 7-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/CogSIMA61085.2024.10553970
Jha VTripathi P(2024)Decentralized knowledge discovery using massive heterogenous data in Cognitive IoTCluster Computing10.1007/s10586-023-04154-z27:3(3657-3682)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10586-023-04154-z
Blasch E(2023)Fusion Orchestration Guidelines (FOG) for Collaborative Computing and Network Data FusionNAECON 2023 - IEEE National Aerospace and Electronics Conference10.1109/NAECON58068.2023.10365788(286-293)Online publication date: 28-Aug-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/NAECON58068.2023.10365788
Michaelis JMorelli A(2023)Applying Mission Information Requirements to Value of Information MiddlewareMILCOM 2023 - 2023 IEEE Military Communications Conference (MILCOM)10.1109/MILCOM58377.2023.10356269(188-193)Online publication date: 30-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/MILCOM58377.2023.10356269
Xhoxhi E(2023)Application-Oriented Resource Orchestration Algorithm for Connected Vehicles2023 IEEE 26th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC)10.1109/ITSC57777.2023.10422671(979-985)Online publication date: 24-Sep-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC57777.2023.10422671
Salimnejad MKountouris MPappas N(2023)Real-time Remote Reconstruction of a Markov Source and Actuation over Wireless2023 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops)10.1109/ICCWorkshops57953.2023.10283717(1386-1391)Online publication date: 28-May-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCWorkshops57953.2023.10283717
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Issue’s Table of Contents