skip to main content
10.1145/2491159.2491161acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobisysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free Access

Information bazaar: a contextual evaluation

Published:16 August 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

The rise in the number of smart devices has created a large ecosystem centred on users? personal information and online activities. Numerous smartphone applications and social networking sites harvest and catalogue users' personal information, enabling brokers such as Google and Facebook to provide a platform for advertisers to use this information for targeted advertising. Despite the fact that the users of these services are at the heart of this ecosystem, there has been little effort in understanding individuals' perception of the value of their personal data in different contexts and situations. In this work, we present the results of our large-scale, contextual study over ten days that used smartphones to collect data on user activities, location, and companionship, as well as the amount of money that individuals attach to such information. Our results indicate that people can be re-markably sensitive to situational cues and also be prone to valuation biases. This study represents a first step towards providing insights into the usefulness of a marketplace for information, where users, or their agents, can freely decide to auction off various pieces of their information within established contexts.

References

  1. Ilias Leontiadis, Christos Efstratiou, Marco Picone, Cecilia Mascolo, "Don't kill my ads! Balancing Privacy in an Ad-Supported Mobile Application Market", In Proceedings of 13th ACM Sigmobile Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications (HotMobile 2012). San Diego, CA, USA. February 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Hamed Haddadi, Pan Hui, Ian Brown "MobiAd: Private and Scalable Mobile Advertising", in The 5th ACM International Workshop on Mobility in the Evolving Internet Architecture (MobiArch2010), Chicago, Illinois, USA, September 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Narseo Vallina-Rodriguez, Jay Shah, Alessandro Finamore, Yan Grunenberger, Konstantina Papagiannaki, Hamed Had-dadi, Jon Crowcroft, "Breaking for Commercials: Characterizing Mobile Advertising", in ACM SIGCOMM Internet Measurement Conference, November 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Hamed Haddadi, Richard Mortier, Steven Hand, Ian Brown, Eiko Yoneki, Derek McAuley and Jon Crowcroft: "Privacy Analytics". ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, April 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Gkatzelis, Vasilis, Aperjis, Christina and Huberman, Bernar-do A., Pricing Private Data (September 14, 2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. C. Riederer, V. Erramilli, A. Chaintreau, B. Krishnamurthy, P. Rodriguez, For Sale: Your Data, By: You, ACM Hotnets 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. A. Adams and M. A. Sasse. Privacy in Multimedia Communications: Protecting Users, Not Just Data. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. B. Huberman, E. Adar, and L. Fine. Valuating privacy. Security Privacy, IEEE, 3(5), Sept.-Oct. 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. A. Acquisti, L. John, and G. Loewenstein. What is Privacy worth? In Proceedings of the Twenty First Workshop on Information Systems and Economics (WISE), Dec. 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. A. Tversky and D. Kahneman. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. In Science, volume 185, pages 1124--1131. 1974.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. D. Kahneman and A. Tversky. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. In Econometrica,, volume 47, pages 263--291. 1979.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. C. Bauer, J. Korunovska, and S. Spiekermann. On the value of information; What Facebook users are willing to pay. In ECIS 2012 Proceedings. Paper 197.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. J. Urban, C. Hoofnagle, S. Li, Mobile phones and privacy. In BCLT Research Paper Series; UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 2103405, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Federal Trade Commisions (2012). Protecting consumer privacy in an era of rapid change: Recommendations for businesses and policy makers. Retrieved from http://www.ftc.gov/os/2012/03/120326privacyreport.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Fehmi Ben Abdesslem and Tristan Henderson. Understanding mobile social behaviour using smartphones. Proceedings of the First Workshop on Observing the Mobile User Experience, Reykjavik, Iceland, October 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Sasank Reddy, Deborah Estrin, Mark Hansen, and Mani Srivastava. Examining micro-payments for participatory sensing data collections. Ubicomp '10, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. George Danezis, Stephen Lewis, Ross Anderson, How Much is Location Privacy Worth? WEIS 2005Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Information bazaar: a contextual evaluation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      HotPlanet '13: Proceedings of the 5th ACM workshop on HotPlanet
      August 2013
      78 pages
      ISBN:9781450321778
      DOI:10.1145/2491159

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 16 August 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      HotPlanet '13 Paper Acceptance Rate11of20submissions,55%Overall Acceptance Rate11of20submissions,55%

      Upcoming Conference

      MOBISYS '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader