skip to main content
10.1145/2493288.2493302acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesplopConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Patterns for online discussions

Published:16 October 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Nowadays, online education is very popular. Almost every school has developed at least a few online courses in order to be competitive in the education market. The main interaction for online courses is based on online discussions.

Also, numerous schools are developing and conducting blended or hybrid courses focusing on a combination of online and traditional-classroom learning that emphasizes virtual constant correspondence. Other schools are using a Learning Management System with a component for online discussions, as part of the curriculum for a traditional classroom setting. This virtual academic presence mirrors businesses 24/7 accessibility.

Conducting and evaluating online discussions may be a difficult task for novice teachers who lack experience in their conduction and evaluation. Patterns for Online Discussions have emerged as a tool to conduct and evaluate online discussions and offers solutions to evaluate online discussions. This paper uses an adaptation of the Alexandrian pattern structure as the core for online discussions.

References

  1. Mary Lynn Manns and Linda Rising, "Fearless Change: Patterns for Introducing New Ideas," Addison-Wesley, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Joe Bergin, "Patterns for Agile Development Practice" euroPLoP 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Coplien, James O. "Software Patterns." SIGS Books, New York, New York, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Coplien, James O. "A Pattern Language for Writers' Workshops." PLoPD 4 Book, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Coplien, James O. Neil B Harrison "Organizational Patterns of Agile Software Development." Prentice-Hall, Inc. 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bergin, Joseph, "Fourteen Pedagogical Patterns for Teaching Computer Science." PACE Univerity.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Bergin, Joseph, "A Pattern Language for Course Development in Computer Science."Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Bergin, Joseph, "Several more Pedagogical Patterns."Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Bergin, Joseph, "Fourteen Pedagogical Patterns."Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Eckstein, Jutta. Marquardt, Klaus. Manns, Mary Lynn. Wallingford, Eugene. "Patterns for Experiential Learning."Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Caeiro, Manuel. Llamas, Martín. Anido, Luis. "E-learning patterns: an approach to facilitate the design of e-learning materials."Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Ellaway, Rachel, "Patterns in E-Learning Standards and Specifications."Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Kerth, Norman, "Project Retrospectives," Dorset House Publishing, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. PLoP 2010, feedback obtained after the presentation of this paper (Reno, 2010)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Patterns for online discussions

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      PLOP '10: Proceedings of the 17th Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs
      October 2010
      388 pages
      ISBN:9781450301077
      DOI:10.1145/2493288

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 16 October 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      PLOP '10 Paper Acceptance Rate28of36submissions,78%Overall Acceptance Rate28of36submissions,78%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader