skip to main content
10.1145/2493432.2493452acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Contextual dissonance: design bias in sensor-based experience sampling methods

Published: 08 September 2013 Publication History

Abstract

The Experience Sampling Method (ESM) has been widely used to collect longitudinal survey data from participants; in this domain, smartphone sensors are now used to augment the context-awareness of sampling strategies. In this paper, we study the effect of ESM design choices on the inferences that can be made from participants' sensor data, and on the variance in survey responses that can be collected. In particular, we answer the question: are the behavioural inferences that a researcher makes with a trigger-defined subsample of sensor data biased by the sampling strategy's design? We demonstrate that different single-sensor sampling strategies will result in what we refer to as contextual dissonance: a disagreement in how much different behaviours are represented in the aggregated sensor data. These results are not only relevant to researchers who use the ESM, but call for future work into strategies that may alleviate the biases that we measure.

References

[1]
Barrett, L. F., and Barrett, D. J. An Introduction to Computerized Experience Sampling in Psychology. Social Science Computer Review 19, 2 (2001), 175--185.
[2]
Bolger, N., Davis, A., and Rafaeli, E. Diary Methods: Capturing Life as it is Lived. Annu. Rev. Psychology (2003).
[3]
Carter, S., Mankoff, J., and Heer, J. Momento: Support for Situated Ubicomp Experimentation. In ACM CHI (San Jose, California, 2007).
[4]
Clark, L., and Watson, D. Mood and the Mundane: Relations Between Daily Life and Self-Reported Mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54, 2 (1988), 296--308.
[5]
Consolvo, S., McDonald, D., Toscos, T., Chen, M., Froehlich, J., Harrison, B., Klasnja, P., LaMarca, A., LeGrand, L., Libby, R., Smith, I., and Landay, J. Acitivity Sensing in the Wild: A Field Trial of Ubifit Garden. In ACM CHI (Florence, Italy, 2008).
[6]
Csikszentmihalyi, M., and LeFevre, J. Optimal Experience in Work and Leisure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56, 5 (1989), 815--822.
[7]
Diener, E., and Emmons, R. The Independence of Positive and Negative Affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47 (1984).
[8]
Eagle, N., and Pentland, A. Reality Mining: Sensing Complex Social Systems. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 10 (2006), 255--268.
[9]
Froehlich, J., Chen, M. Y., Consolvo, S., Harrison, B., and Landay, J. MyExperience: A System for In situ Tracing and Capturing of User Feedback on Mobile Phones. In ACM MobiSys (Puerto Rico, 2007).
[10]
Froehlich, J., Dillahunt, T., Klasnja, P., Mankoff, J., Consolvo, S., Harrison, B., and Landay, J. UbiGreen: Investigating a Mobile Tool for Tracking and Supporting Green Transportation Habits. In ACM CHI (Boston, USA, 2009).
[11]
Intille, S., Rondoni, J., Kukla, C., Ancona, I., and Bao, L. Context-Aware Experience Sampling. In ACM CHI Extended Abstracts (Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, 2003).
[12]
Juslin, P., Liljestrom, S., Vastfjall, D., Barradas, G., and Silva, A. An Experience Sampling Study of Emotional Reactions to Music: Listener, Music, and Situation. Emotion 8, 5 (2008), 668--683.
[13]
Killingsworth, M., and Gilbert, D. A Wandering Mind is an Unhappy Mind. Science 330 (2010).
[14]
Lathia, N., Rachuri, K., Mascolo, C., and Roussos, G. Open Source Smartphone Libraries for Computational Social Science. In 2nd ACM Workshop on Mobile Systems for Computational Social Science (Zurich, Switzerland, 2013).
[15]
Mackerron, G. Happiness and Environmental Quality. PhD Thesis, The London School of Economics and Political Science (2012).
[16]
Mehl, M., and Conner, T., Eds. Handbook of Research Methods for Studying Daily Life. The Guildford Press, 2012.
[17]
Mehl, M., Robbins, M., and Deters, F. Naturalistic Observation of Health-Relevant Social Processes: The Electronically Activated Recorder (EAR) Methodology in Psychosomatics. Psychosomatic Medicine 74 (2012), 410--417.
[18]
Miluzzo, E., Lane, N., Fodor, K., Peterson, R., Lu, H., Musolesi, M., Eisenman, S., Zheng, X., and Campbell, A. Sensing Meets Mobile Social Networks: The Design, Implementation and Evaluation of the CenceMe Application. In ACM SenSys (Raleigh, NC, 2008).
[19]
Nezlek, J. B., Vansteelandt, K., Mechelen, I., and Kuppens, P. Appraisal-Emotion Relationships in Daily Life. Emotion 8, 1 (2008), 145--150.
[20]
Oliver, E. A., and Keshav, S. An Empirical Approach to Smartphone Energy Level Prediction. In ACM Ubicomp (Beijing, China, 2011).
[21]
Patrick, K., Griswold, W., Raab, F., and Intille, S. Health and the Mobile Phone. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 35 (2008).
[22]
Rachuri, K., Mascolo, C., Musolesi, M., and Rentfrow, P. Sociable Sense: Exploring the Trade-Offs of Adaptive Sampling and Computation Offloading for Social Sensing. In ACM MobiCom (Las Vegas, USA, 2011).
[23]
Rachuri, K., Musolesi, M., Mascolo, C., Rentfrow, P. J., Longworth, C., and Aucinas, A. Emotion Sense: A Mobile Phones based Adaptive Platform for Experimental Social Psychology Research. In ACM UbiComp (Copenhagen, Denmark, 2010).
[24]
Stone, A., and Shiffman, S. Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) in Behavioral Medicine. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 16, 3 (1994).

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)"To Click or not to Click": Back to Basic for Experience Sampling for Office Well-being in Shared Office SpacesProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642295(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)Synthesizing Privacy-Preserving Traces: Enhancing Plausibility with Social NetworksPrivacy Preservation in Distributed Systems10.1007/978-3-031-58013-0_2(25-52)Online publication date: 8-Apr-2024
  • (2023)Never miss a beep: Using mobile sensing to investigate (non-)compliance in experience sampling studiesBehavior Research Methods10.3758/s13428-023-02252-956:4(4038-4060)Online publication date: 6-Nov-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Contextual dissonance: design bias in sensor-based experience sampling methods

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    UbiComp '13: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM international joint conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing
    September 2013
    846 pages
    ISBN:9781450317702
    DOI:10.1145/2493432
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 08 September 2013

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. design
    2. human factors
    3. mobile
    4. psychology

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    UbiComp '13
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    UbiComp '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 92 of 394 submissions, 23%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 764 of 2,912 submissions, 26%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)32
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
    Reflects downloads up to 07 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)"To Click or not to Click": Back to Basic for Experience Sampling for Office Well-being in Shared Office SpacesProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642295(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Synthesizing Privacy-Preserving Traces: Enhancing Plausibility with Social NetworksPrivacy Preservation in Distributed Systems10.1007/978-3-031-58013-0_2(25-52)Online publication date: 8-Apr-2024
    • (2023)Never miss a beep: Using mobile sensing to investigate (non-)compliance in experience sampling studiesBehavior Research Methods10.3758/s13428-023-02252-956:4(4038-4060)Online publication date: 6-Nov-2023
    • (2023)Exploring the Learning Process and Effectiveness of STEM Education via Learning Behavior Analysis and the Interactive-Constructive- Active-Passive FrameworkJournal of Educational Computing Research10.1177/0735633122113688861:5(951-976)Online publication date: 30-Jan-2023
    • (2023)Image4Assess: Automatic learning processes recognition using image processingProceedings of the 38th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing10.1145/3555776.3577643(11-16)Online publication date: 27-Mar-2023
    • (2022)Sad or just jealous? Using Experience Sampling to Understand and Detect Negative Affective Experiences on InstagramProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3517561(1-18)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
    • (2022)AWARE-Light: a smartphone tool for experience sampling and digital phenotypingPersonal and Ubiquitous Computing10.1007/s00779-022-01697-727:2(435-445)Online publication date: 5-Nov-2022
    • (2022)Challenges and Opportunities for Designing Technology-Based Ecological Momentary Interventions (EMIs) in Mental HealthProceedings of the International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing & Ambient Intelligence (UCAmI 2022)10.1007/978-3-031-21333-5_88(888-899)Online publication date: 21-Nov-2022
    • (2022)Combining Deep Learning and Computer Vision Techniques for Automatic Analysis of the Learning Process in STEM EducationInnovative Technologies and Learning10.1007/978-3-031-15273-3_3(22-32)Online publication date: 29-Aug-2022
    • (2021)Assessing the Influence of Physical Activity Upon the Experience Sampling Response Rate on Wrist-Worn DevicesInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health10.3390/ijerph18201059318:20(10593)Online publication date: 10-Oct-2021
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media