skip to main content
10.1145/2494091.2495989acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
tutorial

Monitor and understand pilgrims: data collection using smartphones and wearable devices

Published:08 September 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Each year, millions of people visit the sacred sites in Makkah and Madinah. Even though the Hajj pilgrimage is one of the biggest annual events in the world, with many of the pilgrims reporting it as a life-changing experience, quite a little is done to objectively monitor the pilgrims and to understand from the crowd and from the individual point of view what makes this event so special. We present a data collection phase of 8 days of pilgrimage in April 2013 with 41 pilgrims carrying Android smartphones and 10 pilgrims wearing two physiological sensors, namely chest belts and wrist-worn devices. We describe the data recording itself, and emphasize the problems raised and the challenges faced during the study. We provide the best practices for performing solid and efficient user studies in such a difficult environment, and give first insights towards measuring important aspects of the Hajj pilgrimage such as recognition of activities and stages, analysis of group behavior, detection of stressful situations and health monitoring of pilgrims in general.

References

  1. Aharony, N., Pan, W., Ip, C., Khayal, I., and Pentland, A. Social fMRI: Investigating and shaping social mechanisms in the real world. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 7, 6 (2011), 643--659. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Alliance of Religions and Conservation (ARC). Pilgrim numbers. http://www:arcworld:org/projects:asp?projectID=500. Accessed May 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bao, L., and Intille, S. Activity recognition from user-annotated acceleration data. In Pervasive Computing. Springer, 2004, 1--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Center of Research Excellence in Hajj and Umrah. Hajjcore. http://www:hajjcore:org/hajjcoreASPsite/About:asp. Accessed May 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Do, T.-M.-T., and Gatica-Perez, D. Human interaction discovery in smartphone proximity networks. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 17, 3 (2012), 413--431. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Empatica. E2. https://www:empatica:com. Accessed May 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. F.E. Peters. The Hajj: The Muslim Pilgrimage to Mecca and the Holy Places. Princeton University Press, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. HajjDoc. Pilgrims-Sourced Data Collection for Documentation and Continous Improvement of Hajj and Umrah. www:hajjdoc:net. Accessed May 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Hernandez, J., Morris, R. R., and Picard, R. W. Call center stress recognition with person-specific models. In Proc Affective computing and intelligent interaction (ACII) (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. {10} Mantoro, T., Jaafar, A., Aris, M., and Ayu, M. Hajjlocator: A hajj pilgrimage tracking framework in crowded ubiquitous environment. In Int.. Conf. on Multimedia Computing and Systems (2011).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Melillo, P., Bracale, M., and Pecchia, L. Nonlinear heart rate variability features for real-life stress detection. case study: students under stress due to university examination. Biomed Eng Online 10, 1 (2011), 96.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. {12} MIT Media Lab. Human dynamics laboratory. http://hd:media:mit:edu/. Accessed May 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Mohandes, M. Pilgrim tracking and identification using the mobile phone. In IEEE International Symposium on Consumer Electronics (ISCE) (2011).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Olguín, D. O., Gloor, P. A., and Pentland, A. Capturing individual and group behavior with wearable sensors. In AAAI Spring Symposium: Human Behavior Modeling (2009), 68--74.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Patel, S., Park, H., Bonato, P., Chan, L., and Rodgers, M. A review of wearable sensors and systems with application in rehabilitation. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 9, 1 (2012), 21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Poh, M.-Z., Swenson, N. C., and Picard, R. W. A wearable sensor for unobtrusive, long-term assessment of electrodermal activity. In Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc (EMBC) (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Waber, B. N., Olgun, D. O., Kim, T., and Pentland, A. Understanding organizational behavior with wearable sensing technology. In Social Science Research Network (SSRN) 1263992 (2008).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Zephyr. Bioharness 3. www:zephyranywhere:com. Accessed May 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Zephyr. Portal. www:zephyrlife:com/life. Accessed May 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Monitor and understand pilgrims: data collection using smartphones and wearable devices

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UbiComp '13 Adjunct: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing adjunct publication
      September 2013
      1608 pages
      ISBN:9781450322157
      DOI:10.1145/2494091

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 September 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • tutorial

      Acceptance Rates

      UbiComp '13 Adjunct Paper Acceptance Rate254of399submissions,64%Overall Acceptance Rate764of2,912submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader