ABSTRACT
Pushback operations are safety critical as historic incident and accident data show. The consequences are severe injuries of the ground personnel and expensive aircraft damages. As such, pushback process optimization by means of precise tug/aircraft trajectory prediction is considered as valuable risk mitigation strategy. We present a mathematical model to predict these pushback trajectories under various geometric constellations which is a complex solver activity. Our proposed model relies on a kinematic approach to generate the pushback trajectory as a function of aircraft wheelbase and geometric angles for curved segments. The conclusive concept validation is based on commonly provided ICAO standard planning data and shows promising results which will be subject of further field validation tests.
- Dieke-Meier, F., Fricke H. The need for a collision prevention system for the pushback of aircraft. In Proc. ICAS 2012, Brisbane, 2012.Google Scholar
- International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). Aircraft Accident and Incident Investigation. Annex 13 to the Convention on ICAO, 9th ed., ICAO, Montreal, 2004.Google Scholar
- Dell G. Pushback accidents reviewed to identify causes and prevention. Flight Safety Foundation - Airport Operations, Vol. 20 (1994), no.3/4, 1--12.Google Scholar
- Flight Safety Foundation. Communication from the pushback-tractor seat helps prevent serious injuries. Flight Safety Foundation, Vol. 30 (2004), no. 3, 1--4.Google Scholar
- International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control Systems (A-SMGCS) Manual, 1st ed., ICAO, Montreal, 2004.Google Scholar
- Dieke-Meier, F., Fricke H. Expectations from a steering control transfer to cockpit crews for aircraft pushback. In Proc. ATACCS 2012, London, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Barnes, A. G., Yager, T. J. Enhancement of aircraft ground handling simulation capabilities. Neuilly sur Seine: AGARD, 1998.Google Scholar
- Simoni, S. Development of a multi-physics model of a civil aircraft for ground manoeuvers using modelica. Universita di Pisa, 2006.Google Scholar
- Bates, D., Hagström, M. Nonlinear Analysis and Synthesis Techniques for Aircraft Control. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rankin, J., Coetzee, E., Krauskopf, B., Lowenberg, M. Bifurcation and Stability Analysis of Aircraft Turning on the Ground. Journal of guidance, control, and dynamics (2009), 500--511.Google Scholar
- Coetzee, E., J., Krauskopf, B., Lowenberg, M., Nonlinear Aircraft Ground Dynamics. International Conference on Nonlinear Problems in Aviation and Aerospace (2006), 1--8.Google Scholar
- Rankin, J. Bifurcation Analysis of Nonlinear Ground Handling of Aircraft. University of Bristol, 2010.Google Scholar
- Fossum, T. V., Lewis, G. N. A Mathematical Model for Trailer-Truck Jackknifing. SIAM Review Vol. 23 (1981), no.1, 95--99.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Coetzee, E. Modelling and Nonlinear Analysis of Aircraft Ground Manoeuvres. University of Bristol (2011), 39--41.Google Scholar
- International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). Aerodrome Design Manual, Part 2 Taxiways, Aprons and Holding Bays. 4th ed., ICAO, Montreal, 2005.Google Scholar
- Zöbel, D. Mathematical Modeling of the Kinematics of Vehicles. In: Hrubina, Kamil: Mathematical Modeling of Technical Processes. Socrates/Erasmus Summer School, Prevsov, Slovak Republic (2001), 178--200.Google Scholar
- Bronstein, I. N., Semendjaew, K. A., Musiol, G., Muehlig, H. Taschenbuch der Mathematik. Frankfurt am Main, Verlag Harri Deutsch (2005), 1075.Google Scholar
- International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). Aerodromes, Volume I Aerodrome Design and Operations. Annex 14 to the Convention on ICAO, 5th ed., ICAO, Montreal, 2009Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Modeling aircraft pushback trajectories for safe operations
Recommendations
Expectations from a steering control transfer to cockpit crews for aircraft pushback
ATACCS '12: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Application and Theory of Automation in Command and Control SystemsCurrently, the aircraft pushback process does not comply with the envisaged seamless, weather independent "gate-to-gate" business trajectory concept as set out in SESAR or NextGen. As new technologies for aircraft taxiing or pushback such as ...
Research on Aircraft Pushback Procedure in Busy Airport
ICOIP '10: Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Optoelectronics and Image Processing - Volume 02The aircraft pushback is an important aspect of airport surface management and is one of the key factors affecting operation efficiency of apron. The problem of aircraft pushback in busy airports is studied in this paper. On the basis of the analysis on ...
An introduction to the NASA Shuttle ground operations simulator (SGOS)
The Shuttle ground operations simulator (SGOS) simulation software introduced in this paper is used to train NASA ground controllers and to certify launch countdown readiness. The SGOS executive and its subsystems have been an integral component of the ...
Comments