skip to main content
10.1145/2494603.2480326acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseicsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Assessing the support provided by a toolkit for rapid prototyping of multimodal systems

Authors Info & Claims
Published:24 June 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Choosing an appropriate toolkit for creating a multimodal interface is a cumbersome task. Several specialized toolkits include fusion and fission engines that allow developers to combine and decompose modalities to capture multimodal input and provide multimodal output. Unfortunately, the extent to which these toolkits can facilitate the creation of a multimodal interface is hard or impossible to estimate, due to the absence of a scale where the toolkit's capabilities can be measured on. In this paper, we propose a measurement scale, which allows the assessment of specialized toolkits without need for time-consuming testing or source code analysis. This scale is used to measure and compare the capabilities of three toolkits: CoGenIVE, HephaisTK and ICon.

References

  1. Bolt, R. Put-that-there: Voice and gesture at the graphics interface. In SIGGRAPH'80 Proc. of the 7th annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques, ACM (1980). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Coutaz, J., Nigay, L., Salber, D., Blandford, A., May, J., and R., Y. Four easy pieces for assessing the usability of multimodal interaction: The care properties. In Proc. of INTERACT'95 (1995).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. De Boeck, J., Raymaekers, C., and Coninx, K. Comparing nimmit and data-driven notations for describing multimodal interaction. In TAMODIA' 06 Proc. of the fifth International Conference on Task Models and Diagrams for User Interaction Design, Springer Verlag (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. De Boeck, J., Vanacken, D., Raymaekers, C., and Coninx, K. High level modeling of multimodal interaction techniques using NiMMiT. Journal of Virtual Reality and Broadcasting 4, 2 (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Dragicevic, P., and Fekete, J. Support for input adaptability in the icon toolkit. In ICMI'04 Proc. of the 6th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, ACM (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Dumas, B. Frameworks, Description Languages and Fusion Engines for Multimodal Interactive Systems. PhD thesis, University of Fribourg, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Dumas, B., Lalanne, D., and Oviatt, S. Multimodal interfaces: A survey of principles, models and frameworks. In Human Machine Interaction, Springer Verlag (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Dumas, B., Signer, B., and Lalanne, D. A graphical uidl editor for multimodal interaction design based on smuiml. In Proc. of the Workshop on Software Support for User Interface Description Language, WISE publication (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Navarre, D., Palanque, P., Ladry, J., and Barboni, E. ICOs: A Model-Based User Interface Description Technique dedicated to Interactive Systems Addressing Usability, Reliability and Scalability. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 16, 4 (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Nigay, L., and Coutaz, J. A design space for multimodal systems: Concurrent processing and data fusion. In Proc. of INTERACT'93, ACM (1993). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Vanacken, D. Touch-based interaction and collaboration in walk-up-and-use and multi-user environments. PhD thesis, Universiteit Hasselt, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Wahlster, W., Reithinger, N., and Blocher, A. Smartkom: Multimodal communication with a life-like character. In Proc. of the 7th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, DKFI (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Werner, K., Raedle, R., and Harald, R. Interactive Design of Multimodal User Interfaces - Reducing technical and visual complexity. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces 3, 3 (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Assessing the support provided by a toolkit for rapid prototyping of multimodal systems

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      EICS '13: Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGCHI symposium on Engineering interactive computing systems
      June 2013
      356 pages
      ISBN:9781450321389
      DOI:10.1145/2494603

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 24 June 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      EICS '13 Paper Acceptance Rate20of86submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate73of299submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      EICS '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader