skip to main content
10.1145/2499788.2499860acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicimcsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Semi-supervised image classification based on sparse coding spatial pyramid matching

Published:17 August 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Image classification, namely classifying thousands of images into different classes, is an important task in images organization. Although many existing methods attempt to address this task, most of those are proposed in a supervised way based on the labeled data. However, in real world the labeled data is usually hard to obtain while large amounts of unlabeled data can be easier to acquire. The problem of effectively and efficiently classifying images combining unlabeled data with labeled data remains pretty much open. To this end, in this paper we proposed a novel semi-supervised image classification method based on sparse coding spatial pyramid matching (ScSPM). Specifically, we use the unsupervised ScSPM method to get the representation of unlabeled images as like the labeled images. Based on the obtained image representation, we then propose a linear LapSVM as the semi-supervised classifier. Since the proposed method has a linear kernel and can effectively explore the intrinsic structure of data by making full use of the information of unlabeled data, it leads to more accurate and efficient image classification. Experimental results on two real world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our method especially when the labeled data is very little.

References

  1. M. Belkin, P. Niyogi, and V. Sindhwani. Manifold regularization: A geometric framework for learning from labeled and unlabeled examples. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7:2399--2434, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. A. Bosch, A. Zisserman, and X. Muñoz. Image classification using random forests and ferns. In ICCV, pages 1--8, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. M. Fan, N. Gu, H. Qiao, and B. Zhang. Sparse regularization for semi-supervised classification. Pattern Recognition, 44(8):1777--1784, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Y. Jia, C. Huang, and T. Darrell. Beyond spatial pyramids: Receptive field learning for pooled image features. In CVPR, pages 3370--3377, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. S. Lazebnik, C. Schmid, and J. Ponce. Beyond bags of features: Spatial pyramid matching for recognizing natural scene categories. In CVPR (2), pages 2169--2178, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. H. Lee, A. Battle, R. Raina, and A. Y. Ng. Efficient sparse coding algorithms. In NIPS, pages 801--808, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. L.-J. Li and F.-F. Li. What, where and who? classifying events by scene and object recognition. In ICCV, pages 1--8, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. D. G. Lowe. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision, 60(2):91--110, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. S. Melacci and M. Belkin. Laplacian support vector machines trained in the primal. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12:1149--1184, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. F. Wang and C. Zhang. Robust self-tuning semi-supervised learning. Neurocomputing, 70(16-18):2931--2939, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. J. Yang, K. Yu, Y. Gong, and T. S. Huang. Linear spatial pyramid matching using sparse coding for image classification. In CVPR, pages 1794--1801, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. B. Yao, A. Khosla, and F.-F. Li. Combining randomization and discrimination for fine-grained image categorization. In CVPR, pages 1577--1584, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. X. Zhu, Z. Ghahramani, and J. D. Lafferty. Semi-supervised learning using gaussian fields and harmonic functions. In ICML, pages 912--919, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  1. Semi-supervised image classification based on sparse coding spatial pyramid matching

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICIMCS '13: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Internet Multimedia Computing and Service
      August 2013
      419 pages
      ISBN:9781450322522
      DOI:10.1145/2499788
      • Conference Chair:
      • Tat-Seng Chua,
      • General Chairs:
      • Ke Lu,
      • Tao Mei,
      • Xindong Wu

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 17 August 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      ICIMCS '13 Paper Acceptance Rate20of94submissions,21%Overall Acceptance Rate163of456submissions,36%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader