skip to main content
10.1145/2500342.2500356acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmidiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

In situ observations of non-verbal emotional behaviours for multimodal avatar design in e-commerce

Published:24 June 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper reports an empirical study on non-verbal emotional behaviours - facial expressions and body gestures - with the ultimate goal of informing the design of multimodal avatars with authentic emotional expressions for e-commerce websites. In the study 12 salespersons were observed when they were interacting with 29 customers in two furniture retail shops. To facilitate the observational process, we developed a template called NEBOT with a set of common facial expressions and body gestures in human-human communications. Results indicate that neutral facial expressions were more frequently used than expected. Implications for improving the template as a research tool in other contexts and for designing avatars for e-commerce websites are inferred.

References

  1. Fabri, M., Elzouki, S. and Moore, D. Emotionally Expressive Avatar for Chatting, Learning and Therapeutic Intervention. Human-Computer Interaction, Part III, HCII 2007, 275--285. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Argyle, M. Bodily Communication. Methuen & Co, New York, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Fabri, M., Moore, D. J., and Hobbs, D. J. Expressive Agent: Non-Verbal communication in collaborative virtual environment. Proc. of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, Bologna, Italy, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Noma, T., and Badler, N. I. (1997). A virtual human presenter. Proc. of the IJCAI Workshop on Animated Interface Agents: Making Them Intelligent, 45--51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Beskow, J. Animation of Talking agent. ESCA Workshop on Audio-Visual Speech Processing (AVSP'97), (1997). 149--152.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Cowell, A. and Stanney, K. Manipulation of non-verbal interaction style and demographic embodiment to increase anthropomorphic computer character credibility. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies, 62, 2 (2005), 281--306. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Salem, B., and Earle, N. Designing a non-verbal language for expressive Avatars. CVE 2000, ACM, (2000), 93--101. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Guadagno, R., Swinth, K. and Blascovich, J. Social evaluations of embodied agents and avatars. Computers in Human Behavior. 27 (2011), 2380--2385 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Kuligowska, K. and Lasek, M. Virtual assistants support customer relations and business processes. Information Management, Gdańsk University Press, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Baylor, A. The design of motivational agents and avatars. Edu. Tech Research Dev, 59 (2011), 291--300.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Nowak, K. and Ruth, C. The influence of the avatar on online perceptions of anthropomorphism, androgyny, credibility, homophily and attraction. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 1 (2005), 153--178.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Ekman, P. and Friesen, W. V. Facial Action Coding System. Consulting Psych. Press 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Baledassarri, S., Cerezo, E. (2012) Maxine: Embodied Conversational Agents for Multimodal Emotional Communication. Computer Graphics, InTech, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Gazepidis, N. and Rigas, D. Evaluation of Facial Expressions and Body Gestures in Interactive Systems. International Journal of Computers, 2, 1 (2008), 92--97.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. http://depts.washington.edu/adrcweb/UnderstandingAD/BehavMang.shtml (25th, November 2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Alseid, M. and Rigas, D. Efficiency of Multimodal Metaphors in the Presentation of Learning Information. British Computer Society, (2008), 107--110. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Givens, D. B. The nonverbal dictionary of gestures, signs and body language cues, Centre for Nonverbal Studies, Washington, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Strickland, B (Ed.). The GALE Encyclopedia of Psychology (http://go.galegroup.com.)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Baylor, A. and Kim, S. Designing nonverbal communication for pedagogical agents: When less is more. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 2 (2009), 450--457. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Theonas, G., Hobbs, D., Rigas, D. Employing Virtual Lecturers' Facial Expression in Virtual Educational Environment. International Journal of Virtual Reality, 7, 1 (2008), 31--44.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Lisetti C. L. and Schiano, D. J. Automatic facial expression interpretation: Where human-computer interaction, artificial intelligence and cognitive science intersect. Pragmatics and Cognition, 8, 1 (2000), 185--235.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Rigas, D., and Gazepidis, N. A Further Investigation of Facial Expressions and Body Gestures as metaphors in E-Commerce. International Conference on Applied Informatics and Communications, (2007), 148--153. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Bradley M. M. and Lang P. J. Measuring emotion: the Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential. .Journal of Behavioral Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25, 1 (1994), 49--59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Desmet, P. M. A. Measuring emotion; development and application of an instrument to measure emotional responses to products. In: M. A. Blythe, A. F. Monk, K. Overbeeke, & P. C. Wright (Eds.), Funology: from Usability to Enjoyment. Dordrecht: Kluwer. (2003), 111--123. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Heeter, C., Egidio, R., Mishra, P., Winn, B., & Winn. J. Alien Games: Do Girls Prefer Games Designed by Girls? Games and Culture, 4, 1 (2009), 74--100.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Angrosino, M. Doing Ethnographic and Observational Research. SAGE, London 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnson, W. L., Rickel, J. W., and Lester, J. C. Animated pedagogical agents: Face-to-face interaction in interactive learning environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11 (2000), 47--78.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Boyatzis, R. E. Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. SAGE, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. In situ observations of non-verbal emotional behaviours for multimodal avatar design in e-commerce

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      MIDI '13: Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimedia, Interaction, Design and Innovation
      June 2013
      198 pages
      ISBN:9781450323031
      DOI:10.1145/2500342
      • General Chair:
      • Marcin Sikorski,
      • Program Chair:
      • Krzysztof Marasek

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 24 June 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate35of62submissions,56%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader