Abstract
Improve online public discourse by connecting opinions across blogs, editorials, and social media.
- Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., and Lassila, O. The Semantic Web. Scientific American 284, 5 (2001), 28--37.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bex, F., Modgil, S., Prakken, H., and Reed, C. On logical reifications of the Argument Interchange Format. Journal of Logic and Computation. Aug. 2012; doi:10.1093/logcom/exs033Google Scholar
- Bex, F. and Reed, C. Dialogue templates for automatic argument processing. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 245 (2012), 366--377.Google Scholar
- Bizer, C., Heath, T., and Berners-Lee, T. Linked data: The story so far. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems 5, 3 (2009), 1--22.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Budzynska, K. and Reed, C. The structure of ad hominem dialogues. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 245 (2012), 410--421.Google Scholar
- Chesñevar, C., McGinnis, J., Modgil, S., Rahwan, I., Reed, C., Simari, G., South, M., Vreeswijk, G., and Willmott, S. Towards an Argument Interchange Format. Knowledge Engineering Review 21, 4 (2009), 293--316. Google ScholarDigital Library
- De Liddo, A., Sándor, Á., and Buckingham Shum, S. Contested collective intelligence: Rationale, technologies, and a human-machine annotation study. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 21, 4--5 (2012), 417--448. Google ScholarDigital Library
- de Moor, A.D. and Aakhus, M. Argumentation support: From technologies to tools. Commun. ACM 49, 3 (Mar. 2006), 93--98. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dung, P.M. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming, and n--person games. Artificial Intelligence 77, 2 (1995), 321--357. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lawrence, J., Snaith, M., Bex, F.J., and Reed, C. Demonstration papers on the AIFdb, ArguBlogging, Arvina, and TOAST. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 245 (2012), 511--516.Google Scholar
- Okada, A., Buckingham Shum, S.J., and Sherborne, T., Eds. Knowledge Cartography: Software Tools and Mapping Techniques. Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing. Springer, London, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pinkwart, N., Ashley, K., Lynch, C., and Aleven, V. Evaluating an intelligent tutoring system for making legal arguments with hypotheticals. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 19, 4 (2009), 401--424. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rahwan, I. Mass argumentation and the Semantic Web. Web Semantics 6, 1 (2008), 29--37. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rahwan, I., Zablith, F., and Reed, C. Laying the foundations for a World Wide Argument Web. Artificial Intelligence 171, 10--15 (2007), 897--921. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Reed, C., Bex, F., Lawrence, J., and Snaith, M. DEMO: The Argument Analysis Wall. In Proceedings of Digital Futures: The Third Annual Digital Economy All Hands Conference (Aberdeen, U.K., 2012).Google Scholar
- Snaith, M. and Reed, C. TOAST: Online ASPIC+ implementation. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 245 (2012), 509--510.Google Scholar
- van Eemeren, F.H. and Grootendorst, R. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 2004.Google Scholar
- Walton, D.N., Reed, C.A., and Macagno, F. Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 1995.Google Scholar
- Yuan, T., Moore, D., Reed, C., Ravenscroft, A., and Maudet, N. Informal logic dialogue games in human-computer dialogue. Knowledge Engineering Review 26, 3 (2011), 159--174. Google ScholarDigital Library
Recommendations
Specifying and implementing social Web services operation using commitments
SAC '12: Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied ComputingThis paper discusses the specification and development of social Web services using commitments. Social Web services establish and maintain networks of contacts, count on their (privileged) contacts when needed, form with other peers strong and long ...
Laying the foundations for a World Wide Argument Web
This paper lays theoretical and software foundations for a World Wide Argument Web (WWAW): a large-scale Web of inter-connected arguments posted by individuals to express their opinions in a structured manner. First, we extend the recently proposed ...
Argument diagrams in facebook: facilitating the formation of scientifically sound opinions
EC-TEL'12: Proceedings of the 7th European conference on Technology Enhanced LearningStudents use Facebook to organize their classroom experiences [1], but hardly to share and form opinions on subject matters. We explore the benefits of argument diagrams for the formation of scientific opinion on behaviorism in Facebook. We aim at ...
Comments