skip to main content
10.1145/2501105.2501109acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesvigtaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Comparative study of segmentation methods for tree leaves extraction

Published:15 July 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we present a comparative study of segmentation methods, tested for an issue of tree leaves extraction. Approaches implemented include processes using thresholding, clustering, or even active contours. The observation criteria, such as the Dice index, Hamming measure or SSIM for example, allow us to highlight the performance obtained by the guided active contour algorithm that is specially dedicated to tree leaf segmentation (G. Cerutti et al., Guiding Active Contours for Tree Leaf Segmentation and Identification. ImageCLEF2011). We currently offer a dedicated segmentation tree leaf benchmark, comparing fourteen segmentation methods (ten automatic and four semi-automatic) following twenty evaluation criteria.

References

  1. {Beuc79} S. Beucher and C. Lantuéjoul, Use of watersheds in contour detection. REMD, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. {Beuc93} S. Beucher and F. Meyer, The morphological approach to segmentation: the watershed transformation. MMIP, 1993, p. 433--481.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. {Boyk01} Y. Boykov and M. Jolly, Interactive graph cuts for optimal boundary and region segmentation. ICCV, 2001, vol. 1, p. 105--112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. {Brig00} P. Brigger and al., B-spline snakes: a exible tool for parametric contour detection. Trans. on Image Processing, 2000, vol. 9(9), p. 1484--1496. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. {Cann86} J. Canny, A computational approach to edge detection. PAMI, 1986, vol. 8(6), p. 679--698. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. {Ceru11} G. Cerutti and al., Guiding Active Contours for Tree Leaf Segmentation and Identification. CLEF, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. {Chan01} T. Chan and L. Vese, Active Contours Without Edges. Trans. on Image Processing, 2001, vol. 10(2), p. 266--277. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. {Chen95} Y. Cheng, Mean Shift, Mode Seeking, and Clustering. PAMI, 1995, vol. 17(8), p. 790--799. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. {Felz04} P. Felzenszwalb and D. Huttenlocher, Efficient Graph-Based Image Segmentation. IJCV, 2004, vol. 59(2), p. 167--181. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. {Goëa11} H. Goëau and al., The clef 2011 plant images classification task. 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. {Grei89} D. Greig and al., Exact maximum a posteriori estimation for binary images. JRSS, 1989, vol. 51, p. 21--279.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. {Horo74} S. Horowitz and T. Pavlidis, Picture segmentation by a directed split and merge procedure. ICPR, 1974, p. 424--433.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. {Horv06} J. Horvath, Image segmentation using fuzzy c-means. SAMI, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. {Kass87} M. Kass and al., Snakes: Active contour model. IJCV, 1987, p. 321--331.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. {Kuma12} N. Kumar and al., Leafsnap: a computer vision system for automatic plant species identification. ECCV, 2012, p. 502--516. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. {Kurt10} C. Kurtz and al., Multiresolution region-based clustering for urban analysis. IJRS, 2010, vol. 31(22), p. 5941--5973. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. {Lync06} M. Lynch and al., Automatic segmentation of the left ventricle cavity and myocardium in MRI data. CBM, 2006, vol. 36(4), p. 389--407. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. {Marr80} D. Marr and E. Hildreth, Theory of Edge Detection. Biological Sciences, 1980, vol. 207(1167), p. 187--217.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. {Neto06} J. Neto and al., Individual leaf extractions from young canopy images using Gustafson-Kessel clustering and a genetic algorithm. CEA, 2006, vol. 51(1), p. 66--85. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. {Otsu79} N. Otsu, A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. TSMC, 1979, vol. 9(1), p. 62--66.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. {Roth04} C. Rother and al., "Grabcut": interactive foreground extraction using iterated graph cuts. SIGGRAPH, 2004, p. 39--314. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. {Salm06} N. Salman, Image segmentation based on watershed and edge detection techniques. IAJIT, 2006, vol. 3(2), p. 104--110.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. {Teng11} C. Teng and al., Leaf segmentation, classification, and three-dimensional recovery from a few images with close viewpoints. Opt. Eng., 2011, vol. 50(3).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. {Vall12} N. Valliammal and S. Geethalakshmi, Plant Leaf Segmentation Using Non Linear K means Clustering. IJCSI, 2012, vol. 9(1), p. 212--218.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. {Wang84} S. Wang and R. Haralick, Automatic multi-threshold selection. CVGIP, 1984, vol. 25, p. 46--67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. {Wang04} Z. Wang and al., Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity. TIP, 2004, vol. 13(4), p. 600--612. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. {Zimm02} C. Zimmer and al., Segmentation and tracking of migrating cells in videomicroscopy with parametric active contours: a toll for cell-base drug testing. Medical Imaging, 2002, vol. 21(10), p. 1212--1221.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Comparative study of segmentation methods for tree leaves extraction

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          VIGTA '13: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Video and Image Ground Truth in Computer Vision Applications
          July 2013
          71 pages
          ISBN:9781450321693
          DOI:10.1145/2501105

          Copyright © 2013 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 15 July 2013

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          VIGTA '13 Paper Acceptance Rate8of15submissions,53%Overall Acceptance Rate8of15submissions,53%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader