skip to main content
10.1145/2502069.2502079acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Sentribute: image sentiment analysis from a mid-level perspective

Published:11 August 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Visual content analysis has always been important yet challenging. Thanks to the popularity of social networks, images become an convenient carrier for information diffusion among online users. To understand the diffusion patterns and different aspects of the social images, we need to interpret the images first. Similar to textual content, images also carry different levels of sentiment to their viewers. However, different from text, where sentiment analysis can use easily accessible semantic and context information, how to extract and interpret the sentiment of an image remains quite challenging. In this paper, we propose an image sentiment prediction framework, which leverages the mid-level attributes of an image to predict its sentiment. This makes the sentiment classification results more interpretable than directly using the low-level features of an image. To obtain a better performance on images containing faces, we introduce eigenface-based facial expression detection as an additional mid-level attributes. An empirical study of the proposed framework shows improved performance in terms of prediction accuracy. More importantly, by inspecting the prediction results, we are able to discover interesting relationships between mid-level attribute and image sentiment.

References

  1. J. Bollen, H. Mao, and X. Zeng. Twitter mood predicts the stock market. Journal of Computational Science, 2(1):1--8, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. E. Cambria and A. Hussain. Sentic album: content-, concept-, and context-based online personal photo management system. Cognitive Computation, 4(4):477--496, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. R. Datta, D. Joshi, J. Li, and J. Z. Wang. Studying aesthetics in photographic images using a computational approach. In Computer Vision--ECCV 2006, pages 288--301. Springer, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. R. Datta, D. Joshi, J. Li, and J. Z. Wang. Image retrieval: Ideas, influences, and trends of the new age. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 40(2):5, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. A. Esuli and F. Sebastiani. Sentiwordnet: A publicly available lexical resource for opinion mining. In Proceedings of LREC, volume 6, pages 417--422, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. A. Farhadi, I. Endres, D. Hoiem, and D. Forsyth. Describing objects by their attributes. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2009. CVPR 2009. IEEE Conference on, pages 1778--1785. IEEE, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. A. Hanjalic, C. Kofler, and M. Larson. Intent and its discontents: the user at the wheel of the online video search engine. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on Multimedia, pages 1239--1248. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. P. Isola, J. Xiao, A. Torralba, and A. Oliva. What makes an image memorable? In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2011 IEEE Conference on, pages 145--152. IEEE, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. B. J. Jansen, M. Zhang, K. Sobel, and A. Chowdury. Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, 60(11):2169--2188, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. J. Jia, S. Wu, X. Wang, P. Hu, L. Cai, and J. Tang. Can we understand van gogh's mood?: learning to infer affects from images in social networks. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on Multimedia, pages 857--860. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. P. J. Lang, M. M. Bradley, and B. N. Cuthbert. International affective picture system (iaps): Technical manual and affective ratings, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. B. Li, S. Feng, W. Xiong, and W. Hu. Scaring or pleasing: exploit emotional impact of an image. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on Multimedia, pages 1365--1366. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. D. Lundqvist, A. Flykt, and A. Öhman. The karolinska directed emotional faces-kdef. cd-rom from department of clinical neuroscience, psychology section, karolinska institutet, stockholm, sweden. Technical report, ISBN 91-630-7164-9, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. J. Machajdik and A. Hanbury. Affective image classification using features inspired by psychology and art theory. In Proceedings of the international conference on Multimedia, pages 83--92. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. L. Marchesotti, F. Perronnin, D. Larlus, and G. Csurka. Assessing the aesthetic quality of photographs using generic image descriptors. In Computer Vision (ICCV), 2011 IEEE International Conference on, pages 1784--1791. IEEE, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. M. R. Naphade, C.-Y. Lin, J. R. Smith, B. Tseng, and S. Basu. Learning to annotate video databases. In SPIE Conference on Storage and Retrieval on Media databases, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. A. Oliva and A. Torralba. Modeling the shape of the scene: A holistic representation of the spatial envelope. International journal of computer vision, 42(3):145--175, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. B. O'onnor, R. Balasubramanyan, B. R. Routledge, and N. A. Smith. From tweets to polls: Linking text sentiment to public opinion time series. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, pages 122--129, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. V. Ordonez, G. Kulkarni, and T. L. Berg. Im2text: Describing images using 1 million captioned photographs. In Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. B. Pang and L. Lee. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and trends in information retrieval, 2(1-2):1--135, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. G. Patterson and J. Hays. Sun attribute database: Discovering, annotating, and recognizing scene attributes. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2012 IEEE Conference on, pages 2751--2758. IEEE, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. C. G. Snoek and M. Worring. Concept-based video retrieval. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 2(4):215--322, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. D. Tao, X. Tang, X. Li, and X. Wu. Asymmetric bagging and random subspace for support vector machines-based relevance feedback in image retrieval. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on, 28(7):1088--1099, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. M. Thelwall, K. Buckley, G. Paltoglou, D. Cai, and A. Kappas. Sentiment strength detection in short informal text. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12):2544--2558, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. A. Tumasjan, T. O. Sprenger, P. G. Sandner, and I. M. Welpe. Predicting elections with twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. In Proceedings of the fourth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media, pages 178--185, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. M. A. Turk and A. P. Pentland. Face recognition using eigenfaces. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1991. Proceedings CVPR'91., IEEE Computer Society Conference on, pages 586--591. IEEE, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. V. Vonikakis and S. Winkler. Emotion-based sequence of family photos. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on Multimedia, MM '12, pages 1371--1372, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. W. Wang and Q. He. A survey on emotional semantic image retrieval. In Image Processing, 2008. ICIP 2008. 15th IEEE International Conference on, pages 117--120. IEEE, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. T. Wilson, J. Wiebe, and P. Hoffmann. Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 347--354. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. J. Xiao, J. Hays, K. A. Ehinger, A. Oliva, and A. Torralba. Sun database: Large-scale scene recognition from abbey to zoo. In Computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR), 2010 IEEE conference on, pages 3485--3492. IEEE, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. C. C. Yang and T. D. Ng. Terrorism and crime related weblog social network: Link, content analysis and information visualization. In Intelligence and Security Informatics, 2007 IEEE, pages 55--58. IEEE, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. V. Yanulevskaya, J. Uijlings, E. Bruni, A. Sartori, E. Zamboni, F. Bacci, D. Melcher, and N. Sebe. In the eye of the beholder: employing statistical analysis and eye tracking for analyzing abstract paintings. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on Multimedia, MM '12, pages 349--358, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. S. Zhang, M. Yang, T. Cour, K. Yu, and D. N. Metaxas. Query specific fusion for image retrieval. In Computer Vision--ECCV 2012, pages 660--673. Springer, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Sentribute: image sentiment analysis from a mid-level perspective

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          WISDOM '13: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Issues of Sentiment Discovery and Opinion Mining
          August 2013
          90 pages
          ISBN:9781450323321
          DOI:10.1145/2502069

          Copyright © 2013 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 11 August 2013

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          WISDOM '13 Paper Acceptance Rate10of17submissions,59%Overall Acceptance Rate10of17submissions,59%

          Upcoming Conference

          KDD '24

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader