skip to main content
10.1145/2502081.2502179acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Evaluation of salient point methods

Published:21 October 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Processing visual content in images and videos is a challenging task associated with the development of modern computer vision. Because salient point approaches can represent distinctive and affine invariant points in images, many approaches have been proposed over the past decade. Each method has particular advantages and limitations and may be appropriate in different contexts. In this paper we evaluate the performance of a wide set of salient point detectors and descriptors. We begin by comparing diverse salient point algorithms (SIFT, SURF, BRIEF, ORB, FREAK, BRISK, STAR, GFTT and FAST) with regard to repeatability, recall and precision and then move to accuracy and stability in real-time video tracking.

References

  1. Lowe, D G. 2004. Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision, 60(2), 91--110. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bay, H., Ess, A., Tuytelaars, T., and Van Gool, L. 2008. Speeded-up robust features (SURF). Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 110(3), 346--359. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Calonder, M., Lepetit, V., Strecha, C., and Fua, P. 2010. BRIEF: Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features. European Conference on Computer vision, 778--792. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Rublee, E., Rabaud, V., Konolige, K., and Bradski, G. 2011. ORB: An Efficient Alternative to SIFT or SURF. International Conference on Computer Vision, 2564--2571. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Leutenegger, S., Chli, M., and Siegwart, R. 2011. BRISK: Binary robust invariant scalable keypoints. International Conference on Computer Vision, 2548--2555. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Alahi, A., Ortiz, R., and Vandergheynst, P. 2012. FREAK: Fast Retina Keypoint. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Schmid, C., Mohr, R., and Bauckhage, C. 2000. Evaluation of interest point detectors. International Journal Computer Vision, 37(2), 151--172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Mikolajczyk, K., & Schmid, C. 2005. A performance evaluation of local descriptors. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 27(10), 1615--1630. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Miksik, O., Mikolajczyk, K. 2012. Evaluation of Local Detectors and Descriptors for Fast Feature Matching. International Conference on Pattern Recogntion, 2681--2684.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Gauglitz, S., Höllerer, T., and Turk, M. 2011. Evaluation of interest point detectors and feature descriptors for visual tracking. International Journal of Computer Vision, 335--360. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Rosten, E., and Drummond, T. 2006. Machine learning for high-speed corner detection. European Conference on Computer Vision, 430--443. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Agrawal, M., Konolige, K., Blas, M. 2008. Censure: Center Surround Extremas for Realtime Feature Detection and Matching. European Conference on Computer Vision, 102--115.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Shi, J., and Tomasi, C. 1994. Good features to track. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 593--600.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Thomee, B., and Lew, M.S. 2012. Interactive search in image retrieval: a survey. International Journal of Multimedia Information Retrieval, 1(2), 71--86.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Jiang, Y., Bhattacharya, S., Chang, S-F., and Shah, M. 2013. High-level event recognition in unconstrained videos. International Journal of Multimedia Information Retrieval, 2(2), 73--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Kim, T-K., Wong, S-F., and Cipolla, R. 2007. Tensor Canonical Correlation Analysis for Action Classification, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Evaluation of salient point methods

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        MM '13: Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Multimedia
        October 2013
        1166 pages
        ISBN:9781450324045
        DOI:10.1145/2502081

        Copyright © 2013 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 21 October 2013

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • poster

        Acceptance Rates

        MM '13 Paper Acceptance Rate47of235submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate995of4,171submissions,24%

        Upcoming Conference

        MM '24
        MM '24: The 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia
        October 28 - November 1, 2024
        Melbourne , VIC , Australia

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader